CLIL Students’ Affectivity in the Transition between Education Levels: The Effect of Streaming at the Beginning of Secondary Education

References

• Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G., & De Bot, K. (2006). Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in The Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500392160
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, E., Grisaleña, J., & Campo, A. (2008). Plurilingual education in secondary schools: Analysis of results. International Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Research Journal, 1(1), 36–49. https://www.icrj.eu/11/article3.html
   Google Scholar
• Alonso-Belmonte, I., & Fernández-Agüero, M. (forthcoming). Teachers’ narratives of resistance to Madrid’s Bilingual Programme: An exploratory study in secondary education. Article submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Apsel, C. (2012). Coping with CLIL: Dropouts from CLIL streams in Germany. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 47–56. https://www.icrj.eu/14/contents.html
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. (Ed.). (1999). Affect in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, E. L. (2012). Mandated tests: Educational reform or quality indicator? In B. R. Gifford (Ed.), Test policy and test performance: Education, language and culture (pp. 3–24). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Barcelos, A. M. F. (2015). Unveiling the relationship between language learning beliefs, emotions, and identities. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2015.5.2.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, D. (2007). Second language identities. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Block, D. (2011). Citizenship, education and global spaces. Language and Intercultural Communication, 11(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2011.556743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, D. (2012). Class and SLA: Making connections. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811428418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why and why not. System, 41(3), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, R. (2005). English language proficiency and track placement: Variable effects on academic achievement. In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism (pp. 429–451). Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analysis: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2007). The CLIL quality challenge. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts-converging goals: CLIL in Europe (pp. 47–58). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2011). The ITALIC research report: Investigating student gains in content and language integrated learning. University of Aberdeen.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2012). Listening to learners: An investigation into successful learning across CLIL contexts. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dafouz, E., & Guerrini, M. (Eds.). (2009). CLIL across educational levels: Experiences from primary, secondary and tertiary contexts. Richmond.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., Hüttner, J., Schindelegger, V., & Smit, U. (2009). Technology-geeks speak out: What students think about vocational CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 18–25. https://www.icrj.eu/12/contents.html
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dendrinos, B. (2013). Social meanings in global-glocal language proficiency exams. In D. Tsagari, S. Papadima-Sophocleous, & S. Ioannu-Georgiou (Eds.), International experiences in language testing and assessment (pp. 33–57). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889508
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L-2 self. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar-Urmeneta, C., & Nussbaum, L. (Eds.). (2011). Learning in a different language. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1995). White paper on education and training. Teaching and learning. Towards the learning society. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). Include-ED; Actions for success in schools in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017) . Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (n.d.). About multilingualism policy. Multilingualism. European Commission.  Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/multilingualism/about-multilingualism-policy_en (accessed 11 February 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Barrera, A. (2017). Language appropriations, ideologies and identities in bilingual schools in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 10(2), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.731
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Río, J., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., & Pérez-Pueyo, A. (2017). Bilingual education, streaming and secondary education students’ social goals. Revista De Educación, 377, 30–53. http://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/revista-de-educacion/en/numeros-revista-educacion/numeros-anteriores/2017/377/377-2.html
   Google Scholar
• García-Mayo, M. P. (2003). Age, length of exposure and grammaticality judgments in the acquisition of English as a foreign language. In M. P. García-Mayo & M. L. García-Lecumberri (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language (pp. 94–114). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, D. (2013). Diverging performances: The detrimental effects of early selection on equality of opportunity in Hungary. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 32, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, M. (2011). Learners’ perceptions of their experiences of learning subject content through a foreign language. Educational Review, 63(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.571765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaja, P., Barcelos, A. M. F., & Ruohotie, M. (2016). Beliefs, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching. Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., & López Beloqui, R. (2015). The impact of type of approach (CLIL vs. EFL) and methodology (book-based vs. project work) on motivation. Porta Linguarum, 23, 41–57. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5188930
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (2003). Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief. Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., & Dafouz, E. (2010). Content and language integrated programmes in the Madrid region. Overview and research findings. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. 95–114). Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2010). The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 418–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid Regional Authorities. (2010). Orden 5958/2010, de 7 de diciembre, de la Consejería de Educación, por la que se regulan los colegios públicos bilingües de la Comunidad de Madrid [Order 5958/2010, of December 7, of the Ministry of Education, which regulates bilingual public schools in the Community of Madrid]. Official Regional Government of Madrid Gazette, 17, 36–66. Retrieved from: http://w3.bocm.es/boletin/CM_Boletin_BOCM/2011/01/21/01700.PDF ( accessed 11 February 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Madrid Regional Authorities (2018). Madrid, a bilingual community 2017-2018. Dirección General de Innovación, Becas y Ayudas a la Educación de la Consejería de Educación, Juventud y Deporte de la Comunidad de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Martín Rojo, L. (2013). (De)capitalising students through linguistic practices: A comparative analysis of new educational programmes in a global era. In A. Duchêne, M. Moyer, & C. Roberts (Eds.), Language, migration and social inequalities: A critical sociolinguistic perspective on institutions and work (pp. 118–146). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Martín Rojo, L. (2017). Neoliberalism and linguistic governmentality. In J. W. Tollefson & M. Pérez-Milans (Eds.), Oxford handbook of language policy and planning (pp. 544–567). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massler, U. (2012). Primary CLIL and its stakeholders: What children, parents and teachers think of the potential merits and pitfalls of CLIL modules in primary teaching. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mosteller, F., Light, R., & Sacher, A. (1996). Sustained inquiry in education: Lessons from skill grouping and class size. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 797–842. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.4.36m328762x21610x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navés, T. (2010, September). What makes good CLIL teaching and learning? 25th GRETA Convention: Celebrating 25 years of teacher inspiration. University of Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Otwinowska, A., & Foryś, M. (2017). They learn the CLIL way, but do they like it? Affectivity and cognition in upper-primary CLIL classes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(5), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1051944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaja, K. (2012). The impact of students’ attitude on CLIL: A study conducted in higher education. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 5(2), 28–56. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2012.5.2.10
   Google Scholar
• Papaja, K., & Rojczyk, A. (2013). Motivation from the perspective of a CLIL teenage learner. In D. Gabrys-Barker & J. Bielska (Eds.), The affective dimension in second language acquisition (pp. 241–253). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Paran, A. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: Panacea or policy borrowing myth? Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlenko, A., & Norton, B. (2007). Imagined communities, identity, and English language learning. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), Kluwer handbook of English language teaching (pp. 669–680). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillipson, R. (2003). English-only Europe? Challenging language policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2015). Exploring primary school CLIL perceptions in Catalonia: Students’, teachers’ and parents’ opinions and expectations. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.874972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relaño-Pastor, A. M. (2015). The commodification of English in “Madrid, Comunidad Bilingüe”: Insights from the CLIL classroom. Journal of Language Policy, 14(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9338-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Jiménez-Catalán, R. M. (Eds.). (2009). Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R., & Watanabe, Y. (2001). Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and language acquisition (pp. 313–359). University of Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Seikkula-Leino, J. (2007). CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors. Language and Education, 21(4), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.2167/le635.0
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, T., & Llinares, A. (2018). Students’ motivation for content and language integrated learning and the role of program intensity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1517722
   Google Scholar