Better Together? Examining Benefits and Tensions of Generational Diversity and Team Performance

References

• Adkins, A. (2016, May 12). Millennials: The job-hopping generation. Gallup Workplace. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/236474/millennials-job-hopping-generation.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). What works for you may not work for (Gen)me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argote, L., Ingram, P., Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (2000). Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.28831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoko, O. B., Konrad, A. M., & Boyle, M. V. (2012). Online work: Managing conflict and emotions for performance in virtual teams. European Management Journal, 30(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bear, J. B., & Woolley, A. M. (2011). The role of gender in team collaboration and performance. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 36(2), 146–153. DOI: 10.1179/030801811X13013181961473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 709–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). Civilian labor force participation rate by age, sex, race and ethnicity. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/civilian-labor-force-participation-rate.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). Median age of the labor force, by sex, race, and ethnicity. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bursch, D., & Kelly, K. (2014). Managing the multi-generational workplace. UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School. http://execdev.kenan-flagler.unc.edu/managing-the-multigenerational-workplace-0
   Google Scholar
• Cady, S. H., & Valentine, J. (1999). Team innovation and perceptions of consideration: What difference does diversity make? Small Group Research, 30(6), 730–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatman, J. A., & Francis, F. J. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza, D. P., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2017). Generations, age, and the space between: Introduction to the Special Issue. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3(2), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/wax003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, T., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 827–847. https://doi.org/10.5465/256391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deal, J. J. (2007). Retiring the generation gap: How employees young and old can find common ground. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dencker, J. C., Joshi, A., & Martocchio, J. J. (2007). Employee benefits as content for intergenerational conflict. Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2016). Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Publishing. https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail
   Google Scholar
• Ely, R. J. (2004). A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education programs, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 755–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, R. J., Padavic, I., & Thomas, D. A. (2012). Racial diversity, racial asymmetries, and team learning environment: Effects on Performance. Organization Studies, 33(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611435597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, R. (2018). Millennials are the largest generation in the U.S. labor force. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/11/millennials-largest-generation-us-labor-force/
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Hernandez, A. (2014). Climate uniformity: Its influence on team communication quality, task conflict, and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1042–1058. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, P. J., & Mortenson, M. (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, S., Oosterbeek, H., & van Praag, M. (2013). The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Science, 59(7), 1514–1528. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C., Thomas, K. M., & Lance, C. E. (2008). Intentions to initiate mentoring relationships: Understanding the impact of race, proactivity, feelings of deprivations, and relationship roles. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(6), 727–744. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.6.727-744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29(6), 801–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00080-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta‐analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599–627. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41331491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., & Frey, D. (2003). Information in decision-making processes in groups: Theory, empiricism and implications for practice. In: Stumpf, S., & Thomas, A. (Eds.), Teamwork and Team Development, pp. 85–118. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Kick, A. L., Contacos-Sawyer, J., & Thomas, B. (2015). How generation Z’s reliance on digital communication can affect future workplace relationships. Competition Forum, 13(2), 214–222.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Farh, J.-L. (2004). Joint effects of group efficacy and gender diversity on group cohesion and performance. Applied Psychology, 53(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00164.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, D., Swap, W., & Barton, G. (2014, December. 2). What’s lost when experts retire. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2014/12/whats-lost-when-experts-retire
   Google Scholar
• Lester, S. W., Standifer, R. L., Schultz, N. J., & Windsor, J. M. (2012). Actual versus perceived generational differences at work: An empirical examination. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(3), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051812442747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livermore, D. (2016). Driven by difference: How great companies fuel innovation through diversity. American Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, S., & Kuron, L. (2013). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S139–S157. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1913
   Google Scholar
• Maruping, L. M., & Magni, M. (2015). Motivating employees to explore collaboration technology in team contexts. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, P. L., Lobel, S. A., & Cox, T. H. J. (1996). Racioethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Research, 27(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496272003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, D. (2017). 5 generations + 7 values = endless opportunities. Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved form https://www.shrm.org/about-shrm/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., III, Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, J., Tinker, A., & Corna, L. (2018). Younger worker's attitudes and perceptions towards older colleagues. Working with Older People, 22(3), 129–138. doi:10.1108/WWOP-02-2018-0004
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, K., Grenny, J., Maxfield, D., McMillan, R., & Switzler, A. (2013). Crucial accountability: Tools for resolving violated expectations, broken commitments, and bad behavior. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. C., Carmon, A., Tobola, C., & Fowler, M. (2009/2010). Motives for communication: Why the millennial generation uses electronic devices. Journal of the Communication, Speech & Theatre Association of North Dakota, 22, 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Dierendonck, D. (2013). Cultural diversity and team performance: The role of team member goal orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 782–804. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries, B. C., Diestel, S., Shemla, M., Liebermann, S. C., Jungmann, F., Wegge, J., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2013). Age diversity and team effectiveness. In C. Schlick, E. Frieling, & J. Wegge (Eds.), Age-differentiated work systems (pp. 89–118). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, D. E. (2017). The generational bridge. National Environmental Health Association, 79 (7), 5–7. Retrieved from https://www.neha.org/sites/default/files/jeh/JEH3.17-Pres-The-Generational-Bridge.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schneid, M., Rodrigo, I., Li, C., & Kabst, R. (2015). The influence of cultural context on the relationship between gender diversity and team performance: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6), 733–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.957712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirias, D., Karp, H. B., & Brotherton, T. (2007). Comparing the levels of individualism/collectivism between Baby Boomers and Generation X: Implications for teamwork. Management Research News, 30(10), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170710823467
   Google Scholar
• Standifer, R. L., Lester, S. W., Schultz, N. J., & Windsor, J. M. (2013). How age similarity preference, uncertainty, and workplace challenges affect conflict. Human Relations, 66(12), 1597–1618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713482012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, A. (2013). The forthcoming generational workforce transition and rethinking organizational knowledge transfer. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 11(3), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2013.810494
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future. William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Swarnalatha, C., & Prasanna, T. S. (2013). Leveraging employee engagement for competitive advantage: HR’s strategic role. Global Journal of Commerce & Management Perspective, 2(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Austin & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Timmerman, T. A. (2000). Racial diversity, age diversity, interdependence, and team performance. Small Group Research, 31(5), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turban, D. B., Dougherty, T. W., & Lee, F. K. (2002). Gender, race, and perceived similarity effects in developmental relationships: The moderating role of relationship duration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 240–262. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled–and more miserable than ever before. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business Psychology, 25(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9165-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M. (2017). why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Urick, M. J., Hollensbe, E. C., Masterson, S. S., & Lyons, S. T. (2017). Understanding and managing international conflict: An examination of influences and strategies. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3(2), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 514–541. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
   Google Scholar
• Wegge, J., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2009). The impact of age diversity in teams on group performance, innovation and health. In A.-S. Antoniou, C. L. Cooper, G. P. Chrousus, C. D. Spielberger, & M. W. Eysenck (Eds.), Handbook of managerial behavior and occupational health (pp. 79–94). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). JAI.
   Google Scholar