https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1292-4353
References
- Beck, U., Bonss, W., & Lau, C. (2003). The theory of reflexive modernization: Problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403020002001
- Ben-Rafael, E., Oved, Y., & Topel, M. (2013). The communal idea in the 21st century.
- Corsten, M. (1999). The time of generations. Time & Society, 8(2–3), 249–272
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
- Dant, T. (1991). Knowledge, ideology and discourse: A sociological perspective. Routledge.
- Dant, T. (2013). Knowledge, ideology & discourse: A sociological perspective. Routledge.(Original work published 1991).
- Dror, Y. (Ed.). (2008). K’vutzot sheetoofiot b’yisrael [Communal groups in Israel]. Yad Tabenkin. (Hebrew).
- Edmunds, J., & Turner, B. S. (2005). Global generation: Social change in the twentieth century. British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 559–577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00083.x
- Eyerman, R., & Turner, B. S. (1998). Outline of a theory of generation. European Journal of Social Theory, 1(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/136843198001001007
- Feuer, L. S. (1969). The conflict of generation: The character and significance of student movements. Basic.
- Heberle, R. (1951). Social movements. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- Herzog, H. (2007). Dor l’dor yavi’a omer: Hadialectica shel yahasay dorot hevrati’im u’politi’im b’yisrael [Generation to generation will have its say: The dialectics of social and political generational relations in Israel]. In H. Herzog, T. Kohavi, & S. Zelniker Eds., Dorot, merhavim, zehuyot: Mabatim achshavi’im al hevrah b’yisrael [Generation, location, identities: Contemporary perspective on society and culture in Israel] (pp. 21–43). Van Leer Institute and Hakibbutz Hameuchad. (Hebrew).
- Herzog, H. (2013). Mabat dori umigdari al meha’at ha’ohalim. A generational and gender perspective on the tent protest. Theory and Criticism, 41, 69–96. (Hebrew)
- Mannheim, K. (1960). Ideology and utopia. Routledge. (Original work published 1936)
- Mannheim, K. (1970). The problem of generations. Psychoanalytic Review, 57, 378–404.
- Melluci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge University Press.
- Miller, T. (1998). The quest for utopia in twentieth century America. Syracuse University Press.
- Mills, C. W. (1963). Power, Politics, and People. New York: Oxford University Press
- Oberg, B.-M., Norvamem, A.-L., Nasman, E., & Olsson, E. (2004). Changing worlds and the ageing subject: Dimensions in the study of ageing. MPG.
- Pilcher, J. (1994). Mannheim’s sociology of generations: An undervalued legacy. British Journal of Sociology, 45(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/591659
- Pitzer, E., & Donald. (2013). Developmental communalism into the twenty-first century. In E. Ben-Rafael, Y. Oved, & M. Topel (Eds.), The communal idea in the 21st century (pp. 33–52). Brill.
- Schuman, H., Vinitzky-Seroussi, V., & Vinokur, A. D. (2003). Keeping the past alive: Memories of Israeli Jews at the turn of the millennium. Sociological Forum, 18(1), 103–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022606912871
- Shapira, Y. (1984). An Elite without Successors: Generations of Political Leaders in Israel. Tel Aviv: Sifriat Poalim. [Hebrew]
- Sharon, S. (2010). Keren oran: Doh sikum – Seker minahalei k’hilot [Oran Foundation summary report: Survey of community leaders]. Oran Foundation. (Hebrew)
- Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Sage.
- Travis, J. (1999). Exploring the constructs of evaluative criteria for interpretivist research. In Proceedings of the 10th Australasian conference on information systems (Vol. 1999, pp. 1037–1049)
- Van Wynsberghe, R., & Khan, S. (2007). Redefining case study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690700600208