Modeling of Transport Processes in Liquid-Metal Fusion Blankets: Past, Present, and Future

References

• M. ABDOU et al., “Blanket/First Wall Challenges and Required R&D on the Pathway to DEMO,” Fusion Eng. Des., 100, 2 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. BÜHLER et al., “Facilities, Testing Program and Modeling Needs for Studying Liquid Metal Magnetohydrodynamic Flows in Fusion Blankets,” Fusion Eng. Des., 100, 55 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.03.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV et al., “Computational Predictive Capability for Fusion LM Systems Including LM-Plasma Coupling,” White Paper, APS-DPP Community Planning Process (2019); https://sites.google.com/pppl.gov/dpp-cpp/home (current as of Apr. 4, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• C. E. KESSEL et al., “Overview of the Fusion Nuclear Science Facility, a Credible Break-in Step on the Path to Fusion Energy,” Fusion Eng. Des., 135, 236 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.05.08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. MALANG et al., “Development of the Lead Lithium (DCLL) Blanket Concept,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 60, 249 (2011); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST10-212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringing Fusion to the U.S. Grid, The National Academies Press, Washington, District of Columbia (2021); https://doi.org/10.17226/25991.
   Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV et al., “MHD Thermohydraulics Analysis and Supporting R&D for DCLL Blanket in the FNSF,” Fusion Eng. Des., 135, 314 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV, “Physical Background, Computations and Practical Issues of the Magnetohydrodynamic Pressure Drop in a Fusion Liquid Metal Blanket,” Fluids, 6, 3, 110 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6030110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.-J. NI et al., “A Current Density Conservative Scheme for Incompressible MHD Flows at a Low Magnetic Reynolds Number. Part I: On a Rectangular Collocated Grid System,” J. Comp. Phys., 227, 174 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.07.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.-J. NI et al., “A Current Density Conservative Scheme for Incompressible MHD Flows at a Low Magnetic Reynolds Number. Part II: On an Arbitrary Collocated Mesh,” J. Comp. Phys., 227, 205 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.07.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. HUANG et al., “A Comprehensive High-Performance Predictive Tool for Fusion Liquid Metal Hydromagnetics,” HPC-DOE-P2SBIR-FINAL-2017, HyPerComp Inc. (2017); https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1402053 (current as of Apr. 4, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• L. CHEN et al., “Study on the Impacts of Pressure Equalization Slots on MHD Flow and Safety of FCI in DCLL Blanket,” Fusion Eng. Des., 122, 204 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV et al., “Code-to-Code Comparison for a PbLi Mixed-Convection MHD Flow,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 76, 5, 653 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2020.1751378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV et al., “On the Role of Integrated Computer Modelling in Fusion Technology,” Fusion Eng. Des., 157, 111671 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. BADALASSI et al., “Fusion Energy Reactor Models Integrator (FERMI),” ORNL proposal to ARPA-E and SC-FES # 2288-1507 under DE-FOA 0002288 “GAMOW” (2020).
   Google Scholar
• B. N. SORBOM et al., “ARC: A Compact, High-Field, Fusion Nuclear Science Facility and Demonstration Power Plant with Demountable Magnets,” Fusion Eng. Des., 100, 378 (2015); https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379615302337 (current as of Apr. 4, 2022).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV et al., “Dual-Coolant Lead-Lithium (DCLL) Blanket Status and R&D Needs,” Fusion Eng. Des., 100, 44 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.12.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. J. PATTISON et al., “Tritium Transport in Poloidal Flows of a DCLL Blanket,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 60, 809 (2015); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST10-309.
   Google Scholar
• H. ZHANG, A. YING, and M. ABDOU, “Impact of Pressure Equalization Slot in Flow Channel Insert on Tritium Transport in a DCLL-Type Poloidal Duct,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 64, 651 (2013); https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.13182/FST12-579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. A. SHERCLIFF, A Textbook of Magnetohydrodynamics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (1965).
   Google Scholar
• P. H. ROBERTS, An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics, Longmans, Green and Co., Harlow, United Kingdom (1967).
   Google Scholar
• A. VATAZHIN, G. LYUBIMOV, and S. REGIRER, Magnetohydrodynamic Flows in Ducts, Nauka, Moscow, Russia (1970) ( in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• H. BRANOVER, Magnetohydrodynamic Flows in Ducts, Halsted Press, New York (1978).
   Google Scholar
• V. A. GLUKHIH, A. V. TANANAEV, and I. R. KIRILLOV, Magnetohydrodynamics in Power Engineering, Energoatomizdat, Moscow, Russia (1987) (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• R. MOREAU, Magnetohydrodynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1990).
   Google Scholar
• U. MÜLLER and L. BÜHLER, Magnetofluiddynamics in Channels and Containers, Springer, Berlin, Germany (2001).
   Google Scholar
• P. A. DAVIDSON, An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Magnetohydrodynamics. Historical Evolution and Trends, S. MOLOKOV, R. MOREAU, and H. K. MOFFAT, Eds., Springer, Berlin, Germany (2007).
   Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV et al., “MHD Thermofluid Issues of Liquid-Metal Blankets: Phenomena and Advances,” Fusion Eng. Des., 85, 1196 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.02.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. LIELAUSIS, “Liquid-Metal Magnetohydrodynamics,” At. Energy Rev., 13, 527 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• S. MALANG et al., “Crucial Issues on Liquid Metal Blanket Design,” Fusion Eng. Des., 16, 95 (1991); https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-3796(91)90186-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. R. KIRILLOV et al., “Present Understanding of MHD and Heat Transfer Phenomena for Liquid Metal Blankets,” Fusion Eng. Des., 27, 533 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-3796(95)90171-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. MORLEY et al., “Liquid Magnetohydrodynamics—Recent Progress and Future Directions for Fusion,” Fusion Eng. Des., 51–52, 701 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(00)00197-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. B. MORLEY, S. MALANG, and I. KIRILLOV, “Thermofluid Magnetohydrodynamic Issues for Liquid Breeders,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 47, 488 (2005); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST05-A733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. MISTRANGELO et al., “MHD Flow in Liquid Metal Blankets: Major Design Issues, MHD Guidelines and Numerical Analysis,” Fusion Eng. Des., 173, 112795 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. ZIKANOV et al., “Mixed Convection in Pipe and Duct Flows with Strong Magnetic Fields,” Appl. Mech. Rev., 71, 010801 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049833.
   Google Scholar
• C. MISTRANGELO et al., “MHD R&D Activities for Liquid Metal Blankets,” Energies, 14, 6640 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV, R. MOREAU, and M. ABDOU, “Characterization of Key Magnetohydrodynamic Phenomena in PbLi Flows for the US DCLL Blanket,” Fusion Eng. Des., 83, 771 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.07.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. KRAUSS et al., “Precipitation Phenomena During Corrosion Testing in Forced-Convection Pb-15.7Li Loop PICOLO,” Fusion Eng. Des., 146, 1782 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. F. TORTORELLI, “Deposition Behavior of Ferrous Alloys in Molten Lead-Lithium,” Fusion Eng. Des., 14, 335 (1991); https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-3796(91)90017-K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. SANNIER et al., “Corrosion of Austenitic and Martensitic Stainless Steels in Flowing Pbl7Li Alloy,” Fusion Eng. Des., 14, 299 (1991); https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-3796(91)90013-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. A. SEDANO, “Helium Bubble Cavitation Phenomena in Pb-15.7Li and Potential Impact on Tritium Transport Behavior in HCL Breeding Channels,” Informes Técnicos Ciemat, 1111, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (2007); https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/20930058 (current as of Apr. 4, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• L. BATET, E. MAS DE LES VALLS, and L. A. SEDANO, “Mathematical Models for Tritium Permeation Analysis in Liquid Metal Flows with Helium Bubbles,” Fusion Eng. Des., 89, 1158 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.04.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV, S. CUEVAS, and A. BELTRÁN, “Induced Electric Current-Based Formulation in Computations of Low Magnetic Reynolds Number Magnetohydrodynamic Flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 229, 1558 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.10.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. C. SCHULLER, “Disruptions in Tokamaks,” Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 37, A135 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/37/11A/009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. BLANCHARD and C. MARTIN, “Thermal and Electromagnetic Transients in Liquid Metal Surfaces of the FNSF,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 75, 918 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2019.1602399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. KAWCZYNSKI, S. SMOLENTSEV, and M. ABDOU, “Characterization of the Lid-Driven Cavity Magnetohydrodynamic Flow at Finite Magnetic Reynolds Numbers Using Far-Field Magnetic Boundary Conditions,” Phys. Fluids, 30, 067103 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5036775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. KHODAK et al., “Numerical Model of Dual-Coolant Lead-Lithium (DCLL) Blanket,” Fusion Eng. Des., 137, 124 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. KRAWCZYK and J. A. TEGOPOULOS, Numerical Modelling of Eddy Currents, Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (1993).
   Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV, “MHD Duct Flows Under Hydrodynamic ‘Slip’ Condition,” Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 23, 557 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-009-0108-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. SIEVERTS, “The Absorption of Gases by Metals,” Z. Metallkd., 21, 37 (1929).
   Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV et al., “Numerical Study of Corrosion of Ferritic/Martensitic Steels in the Flowing PbLi With and Without a Magnetic Field,” J. Nucl. Mater., 432, 294 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SUBRAMANIAM, “Lagrangian-Eulerian Methods for Multiphase Flows,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 39, 215 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2012.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. A. DREW, “Mathematical Modeling of Two-Phase Flow,” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 15, 261 (1983); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.001401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. TAIRA et al., “Modal Analysis of Fluid Flows: An Overview,” AIAA J., 55, 4013 (2017); https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056060.
   Google Scholar
• I. E. BUTSENIEKS et al., “Magnetohydrodynamic Flow in a Square Tube with Walls of Different Electrical Conductivity in an Oblique Transverse Magnetic Field,” Magnetohydrodynamics, 7, 335 (1971).
   Google Scholar
• A. STERL, “Numerical Simulation of Liquid-Metal MHD Flows in Rectangular Ducts,” J. Fluid Mech., 216, 161 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112090000386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV et al., “An Approach to Verification and Validation of MHD Codes for Fusion Applications,” Fusion Eng. Des., 100, 65 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.04.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. BÜHLER, “Magnetohydrodynamic Flows in Arbitrary Geometries in Strong Nonuniform Magnetic Fields—A Numerical Code for the Design of Fusion Reactor Blankets,” Fusion Technol., 27, 3 (1995); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST95-A30346.
   Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV, N. MORLEY, and M. ABDOU, “Code Development for Analysis of MHD Pressure Drop Reduction in a Liquid Metal Blanket Using Insulation Technique Based on a Fully Developed Flow Model,” Fusion Eng. Des., 73, 83 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. KRASNOV, O. ZIKANOV, and T. BOECK, “Numerical Study of Magnetohydrodynamic Duct Flow at High Reynolds and Hartmann Numbers,” J. Fluid Mech., 704, 421 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2012.256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. KOBAYASHI, “Large Eddy Simulation of Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulent Duct Flows,” Phys. Fluids, 20, 015102 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2832779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. B. MORLEY et al., “MHD Simulations of Liquid Metal Flow through a Toroidally Oriented Manifold,” Fusion Eng. Des., 83, 1335 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. B. MORLEY et al., “Progress on the Modeling of Liquid Metal, Free Surface, MHD Flows for Fusion Liquid Walls,” Fusion Eng. Des., 72, 3 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2004.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.-J. NI et al., “Validation Strategies of HIMAG in Interfacial Flow Computation for Fusion Applications,” Fusion Eng. Des., 81, 1535 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.09.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.-J. NI et al., “Validation Case Results for 2D and 3D MHD Simulations,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 52, 587 (2007); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST07-A1552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. NARULA et al., “Exploring Liquid Metal Plasma Facing Component (PFC) Concepts—Liquid Metal Film Flow Behavior Under Fusion Relevant Magnetic Fields,” Fusion Eng. Des., 81, 1543 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.08.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. PATEL et al., “Validation of Numerical Solvers for Liquid Metal Flow in a Complex Geometry in the Presence of a Strong Magnetic Field,” Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 32, 165 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-017-0446-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. J. RHODES, S. SMOLENTSEV, and M. A. ABDOU, “Effect of the Length of the Poloidal Ducts on Flow Balancing in a Liquid Metal Blanket,” Fusion Eng. Des., 136, 847 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. J. RHODES, S. SMOLENTSEV, and M. ABDOU, “Magnetohydrodynamic Pressure Drop and Flow Balancing of Liquid Metal Flow in a Prototypic Fusion Blanket Manifold,” Phys. Fluids, 30, 057101 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5026404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SAHU and R. BHATTACHARYAY, “Validation of COMSOL Code for Analyzing Liquid Metal Magnetohydrodynamic Flow,” Fusion Eng. Des., 127, 151 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. YAN, A. YING, and M. ABDOU, “Numerical Study of Magneto-Convection Flows in a Complex Prototypical Liquid-Metal Fusion Blanket Geometry,” Fusion Eng. Des., 159, 111688 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. M. DE LES VALLS, “Development of a Simulation Tool for MHD Flows under Nuclear Fusion Conditions,” Technical University of Catalonia (2011); https://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2117/95157 (current as of Apr. 4, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• D. SUAREZ et al., “Liquid Metal MHD Flow Influence on Heat Transfer Phenomena in Fusion Reactor Blankets,” Fusion Eng. Des., 170, 112503 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. KHODAK, “Numerical Analysis of 2-D and 3-D MHD Flows Relevant to Fusion Applications,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 45, 2561 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2017.2734106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. TASSONE and G. CARUSO, “Computational MHD Analyses in Support of the Design of the WCLL TBM Breeding Zone,” Fusion Eng. Des., 170, 112535 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. N. KIM, “A Liquid Metal Magnetohydrodynamic Duct Flow with Sudden Contraction in a Direction Perpendicular to a Magnetic Field,” Comput. Fluids, 108, 156 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. URGORRI et al., “Magnetohydrodynamic and Thermal Analysis of PbLi Flows in Poloidal Channels with Flow Channel Insert for the EU-DCLL Blanket,” Nucl. Fusion, 58, 106001 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aad299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. R. URGORRI, I. FERNÁNDEZ-BERCERUELO, and D. RAPISARDA, “Magneto-Convective Analyses of the PbLi Flow for the EU-WCLL Fusion Breeding Blanket,” Energies, 14, 6192 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. R. URGORRI et al., “The Influence of MHD Boundary Layers on Tritium Permeation in PbLi Flows for Fusion Breeding Blankets,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 181, 121906 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. SWAIN et al., “Thermofluid MHD Studies in a Model of Indian LLCB TBM at High Magnetic Field Relevant to ITER,” Fusion Eng. Des., 150, 111374 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.111374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. SWAIN et al., “MHD Effects of Partition Plates on Thermofluid Performance of Indian Variant LLCB TBM for ITER,” Fusion Eng. Des., 164, 112193 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.112193.
   Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV et al., “MHD and Heat Transfer Considerations for the US DCLL Blanket for DEMO and ITER TBM,” Fusion Eng. Des., 83, 1788 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV, N. MORLEY, and M. ABDOU, “MHD and Thermal Issues of the SiCf/SiC Flow Channel Insert,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 50, 107 (2006); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST06-A1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. L. SMITH et al., “Blanket Comparison and Selection Study—Final Report,” ANL/FPP-84-1, Argonne National Laboratory (1984).
   Google Scholar
• L. CHEN, S. SMOLENTSEV, and M. J. NI, “Toward Full Simulations for a Liquid Metal Blanket: MHD Flow Computations for a PbLi Blanket Prototype at Ha ∼ 104,” Nucl. Fusion, 60, 076003 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab8b30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. CHEN, S. SMOLENTSEV, and M. J. NI, “Toward Full Simulations for a Liquid Metal Blanket: Part 2. Computations of MHD Flows with Volumetric Heating for a PbLi Blanket Prototype at Ha ∼ 104 and Gr ∼ 1012,” Nucl. Fusion, 62, 026042 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac3fea.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. WU and FDS TEAM, “Conceptual Design and Testing Strategy of a Dual Functional Lithium-Lead Test Blanket Module in ITER and EAST,” Nucl. Fusion, 47, 1533 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/11/015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.-H. LIU et al., “Effects of Magnetohydrodynamic Mixed Convection on Fluid Flow and Structural Stresses in the DCLL Blanket,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 135, 847 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. PETERSEN, “The Properties of Helium: Density, Specific Heats, Viscosity, and Thermal Conductivity at Pressures from 1 to 100 bar and from Room Temperature to About 1800 K,” Risoe-R No. 224, Risø National Laboratory, Denmark(1970); https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/52768509/ris_224.pdf (current as of Apr. 4, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• N. I. KOLEV, Multiphase Flow Dynamics 2, Springer (2005).
   Google Scholar
• C. M. ROWELL and K. Y. SZEMA, “CAD2Mesh—A Meshing Toolkit for Full Wave EM Solvers,” presented at the 31st Int. Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics, Williamsburg, Virginia, March 22–26, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• ANSYS ICEM CFD Tutorial Manual, ANSYS Inc. (2012).
   Google Scholar