Advanced search
Publication Cover
Fusion Science and Technology Volume 79, 2023 - Issue 8: Special issue featuring papers from the 25th Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (TOFE 22)
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,971
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Advancing Methods for Fusion Neutronics: An Overview of Workflows and Nuclear Analysis Activities at UKAEA

Alex Valentinea Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United KingdomCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6448-9701
ORCID Icon,
Thomas Berrya Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United KingdomORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7087-908X
ORCID Icon,
Steven Bradnama Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
Hari Chohana Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
Tim Eadea Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
Callum Grovea Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United KingdomORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3630-5637
ORCID Icon,
James Haguesa Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
Keir Hearna Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
James Hodsona Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
Kimberley Lennona Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
Jonathan Naisha Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
Joseph Neilsona Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
Chantal Nobsa Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United KingdomORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2259-8288
ORCID Icon,
Lee Packera Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United KingdomORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-9587
ORCID Icon,
Andrew Turnera Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
Anthony Turnera Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
Luke Woodallb University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, United Kingdom
&
Ross Worralla Culham Science Centre, Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, Oxford, United Kingdom
 show all
Pages 1008-1022 | Received 02 Aug 2022, Accepted 26 Oct 2022, Published online: 21 Feb 2023

References

  • “ Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production,” United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (2022); https://step.ukaea.uk/.
  • M. COLEMAN and S. MCINTOSH, “BLUEPRINT: A Novel Approach to Fusion Reactor Design,” Fusion Eng. Des., 139, 26, 26 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.12.036.
  • J. MORRIS et al., “Preparing Systems Codes for Power Plant Conceptual Design,” Nucl. Fusion, 61, 11, 116020 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac18dd.
  • F. FRANZA et al., “MIRA: A Mpulti-hysics Approach to Designing a Fusion Power Plant,” Nucl. Fusion, 62, 7, 076042 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac6433.
  • P. K. ROMANO et al., “OpenMC: A State-of-the-Art Monte Carlo Code for Research and Development,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 82, 90 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.048.
  • J. LEPPÄNEN et al., “The Serpent Monte Carlo Code: Status, Development and Applications in 2013,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 82, 142 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.024.
  • Y. WU et al., “CAD-Based Monte Carlo Program for Integrated Simulation of Nuclear System SuperMC,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 82, 161 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.058.
  • L. LU, Y. QIU, and U. FISCHER, “Improved Solid Decomposition Algorithms for the CAD-to-MC Conversion Tool McCad,” Fusion Eng. Des., 124, 1269 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.02.040.
  • J. GOORLEY, “Initial MCNP6 Release Overview—MCNP6 Version 1.0,” LA-UR-13-22934, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2013).
  • S. W. MOSHER et al., “ADVANTG: An Automated Variance Reduction Parameter Generator,” ORNL/TM-2013/416 Rev. 1, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2015).
  • A. DAVIS and A. TURNER, “Comparison of Global Variance Reduction Techniques for Monte Carlo Radiation Transport Simulations of ITER,” Fusion Eng. Des., 9, 86, 2698 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.01.059.
  • B. COLLING et al., “Neutronics Analysis for Integration of ITER Diagnostics Port EP10,” Fusion Eng. Des., 109-111, 1109 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.01.013.
  • T. EADE et al., “Movement of Active Components in the Shutdown Dose Rate Analysis of the ITER Neutral Beam Injectors,” Fusion Eng. Des., 98–99, 2130 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.12.022.
  • A. DAVIS and A. TURNER, “Application of Novel Global Variance Reduction Methods to Fusion Radiation Transport Problems,” Int. Conf. Math. Comput. Methods Appl. Nucl. Sci. Eng., 48, 9 (2011); https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:48022314.
  • A. DAVIS and R. PAMPIN, “Benchmarking the MCR2S System for High-Resolution Activation Dose Analysis in ITER,” Fusion Eng. Des., 85, 1, 87 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2009.07.002.
  • J.-C. SUBLET et al., “FISPACT-II: An Advanced Simulation System for Activation, Transmutation and Material Modelling,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 139, 77, 77 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2017.01.002.
  • “ Welcome to pypact’s Documentation!,” United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (2019); https://pypact.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html.
  • “ UKAEA/SpaceClaim_API_NeutronicsTools,” United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (2019); https://github.com/ukaea/SpaceClaim_API_NeutronicsTools.
  • “ Stainless Steel Pipe,” ASME B36.19M-2004, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2004).
  • M. DE PIETRI et al., “Integral Modelling of the ITER Cooling Water Systems Radiation Source for Applications Outside of the Bio-Shield,” Fusion Eng. Des., 171, 112575 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112575.
  • “F4E,” Fusion for Energy (2019); https://github.com/Radiation-Transport.
  • D. VALENZA et al., “Proposal of Shutdown Dose Estimation Method by Monte Carlo Code,” Fusion Eng. Des., 55, 4, 411 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(01)00188-0.
  • P. SAUVAN et al., “D1SUNED System for the Determination of Decay Photon Related Quantities,” Fusion Eng. Des., 151, 111399 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.111399.
  • R. VILLARI et al., “Shutdown Dose Rate Assessment with the Advanced D1S Method: Development, Applications and Validation,” Fusion Eng. Des., 89, 9, 2083 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.01.071.
  • T. EADE, S. BRADNAM, and P. KANTH, “A New Novel-1-Step Shutdown Dose Rate Method Combining Benefits from the Rigorous-2-Step and Direct-1-Step Methods,” Fusion Eng. Des., 181, 113213 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2022.113213.
  • M. LOUGHLIN, “Conclusions of Shutdown Dose Rate Benchmark Study,” ITER D 6593RF v1.0, 6th ITER Neutronics Meeting, Hefei, China, 2011.
  • “SINBAD—Radiation Shielding Benchmark Experiments,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 159, 108254, (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108254.
  • A. VALENTINE et al., “Benchmarking of Emergent Radiation Transport Codes for Fusion Neutronics Applications,” Fusion Eng. Des., 180, 113197 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2022.113197.
  • A. VALENTINE et al., “Benchmarking of the Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code for Fusion Neutronics Applications,” PHYSOR 2020 Conf. Proc., 247, 04015 (2020).
  • A. TURNER, “Investigations into Alternative Radiation Transport Codes for ITER Neutronics Analysis,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 116, 17, 251 (2017).
  • A. TURNER et al., “Applications of Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code to ITER Neutronics Analysis,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 74, 4, 315 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2018.1489660.
  • T. EADE et al., “Shutdown Dose Rate Benchmarking Using Modern Particle Transport Codes,” Nucl. Fusion, 60, 5, 056024 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab8181.
  • A. VALENTINE, R. WORRALL, and J. LEPPÄNEN, “Investigation of Novel Weight Window Methods in Serpent 2 for Fusion Neutronics Applications,” Fusion Eng. Des., 178, 113090 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2022.113090.
  • T. TAUTGES et al., “Acceleration Techniques for Direct Use of CAD-Based Geometries in Monte Carlo Radiation Transport,” International Conference on Advances in Mathematics, Computational Methods, and Reactor Physics, Saratoga Springs, New York, May 3–7, 2009.
  • R. PAMPIN et al., “Developments and Needs in Nuclear Analysis of Fusion Technology,” Fusion Eng. Des., 88, 6–8, 454 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.03.049.
  • J. SHIMWELL et al., “The Paramak: Automated Parametric Geometry Construction for Fusion Reactor Designs,” F1000Research, 10:27 (2021); https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.28224.1.
  • J. LEPPÄNEN, “Response Matrix Method–Based Importance Solver and Variance Reduction Scheme in the Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 11, 1416 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1603710.
  • Y. HU et al., “Implementation and Benchmarking of an Automatic Global Variance Reduction Method on OpenMC,” Fusion Eng. Des., 173, 112829 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112829.
  • A. DAVIS, S. LILLEY, and J. SHIMWELL, “csg2csg: A Tool to Assist Validation & Verification,” Eur. Phys. J. Web of Conf., 247, 04012 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124704012.
  • D. TILLEY, H. WELLER, and C. CHEVES, “Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 16–17,” Nucl. Phys. A, 564, 1, 1 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(93)90073-7.
  • C. NOBS et al., “Computational Evaluation of N-16 Measurements for a 14 MeV Neutron Irradiation of an ITER First Wall Component with Water Circuit,” Fusion Eng. Des., 159, 111743 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111743.
  • T. BERRY et al., “Integration of Fluid Dynamics into Activation Calculations for Fusion,” Fusion Eng. Des., 173, 112894 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112894.
  • H. WELLER et al., “A Tensorial Approach to CFD Using Object Oriented Techniques,” Comput. Phys., 12, 6, 620 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.168744.
  • F. ANDREOLI et al., “Comparison Between Measurement and Calculations for a 14 MeV Neutron Water Activation Experiment,” EPJ Web Conf., 239, 21002 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023921002.
  • C. MORENO CARRERO, F. CAU, and R. PAMPIN, “Radio-Species Transport Model for Coupled Fluid Dynamics-Neutron Activation Calculations,” Fusion Eng. Des., 181, 113171 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2022.113171.
  • A. ŽOHAR et al., “Analysis of Irradiation Experiments with Activated Water Radiation Source at the JSI TRIGA Research Reactor,” Fusion Eng. Des., 161, 111946 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111946.
  • L. PACKER et al., “Status of ITER Material Activation Experiments at JET,” Fusion Eng. Des., 124, 1150 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.01.037.
  • L. W. PACKER et al., “Activation of ITER Materials in JET: Nuclear Characterisation Experiments for the Long-Term Irradiation Station,” Nucl. Fusion, 58, 9, 096013 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aacca0.
  • L. W. PACKER et al., “Technological Exploitation of the JET Neutron Environment: Progress in ITER Materials Irradiation and Nuclear Analysis,” Nucl. Fusion, 61, 11, 116057 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac2a6b.
  • L. W. PACKER et al., “UK Fusion Technology Experimental Activities at the ASP 14 MeV Neutron Irradiation Facility,” Fusion Eng. Des., 87, 5–6, 662 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.01.044.
  • L. W. PACKER et al., “Integral Cross Section Measurements Around 14 MeV for Validation of Activation Libraries,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 119, 173 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.08.048.
  • L. W. PACKER et al., “A Comparison of Oxide Decay Heat Simulations and Nuclear Data Libraries with Fusion Irradiation Experiments,” EPJ Web of Conf., 247, 09011, EDP Sciences (2021).
  • T. STAINER et al., “14 MeV Neutron Irradiation Experiments-Gamma Spectroscopy Analysis and Validation Automation,” EPJ Web of Conf., 247, 09010, EDP Sciences (2021).
  • M. ANGELONE et al., “Measurement of Delayed Neutron Emission from Water Activated by 14 MeV Neutrons in a FW Mock-up of ITER,” Fusion Eng. Des., 160, 111998 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111998.
  • M. ANGELONE et al., “Neutronics Experiments, Radiation Detectors and Nuclear Techniques Development in the EU in Support of the TBM Design for ITER,” Fusion Eng. Des., 96, 2 (2015).
  • M. SAVVA et al., “VERDI Detector Benchmark Experiment at the ENEA 14 MeV Frascati Neutron Generator,” Fusion Eng. Des., 146, 1877 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.055.
  • L. W. PACKER et al., “Neutron Detection Technologies and Measurement Challenges at JET and ITER,” IAEA TECDOC SERIES 313, International Atomic Energy Agency (2020).
  • I. E. STAMATELATOS et al., “Novel Neutron Activation Detector for Fusion,” IAEA TECDOC SERIES 301, International Atomic Energy Agency (2020).
  • C. R. NOBS et al., “Neutron Spectrum Unfolding for the Development of a Novel Neutron Detector for Fusion,” Fusion Eng. Des., 146, 2658 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.04.074.
  • L. W. PACKER et al., “Backwards Extrapolation Activation Diagnostics and Their Dynamic Range for Pulsed Neutron Source Measurements,” Fusion Eng. Des., 160, 111923 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111923.
  • R. WORRALL et al., “The Development, Testing and Comparison of Unfolding Methods in SPECTRA-UF for Neutron Spectrometry,” Fusion Eng. Des., 161, 112038 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.112038.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.