Have Cognitive Diagnostic Models Delivered Their Goods? Some Substantial and Methodological Concerns

REFERENCES

• Buck , G. and Tatsuoka , K. 1998 . Application of the rule-space procedure to language testing: examining attributes of a free response listening test . Language Testing , 15 : 119 – 157 .
   Google Scholar
• DiBello , L.V. , Roussos , A. and Stout , W. 2007 . “ Review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models ” . In Handbook of Statistics Psychometrics Edited by: Rao , C. R. and Sinharay , S. Vol. 26 , 979 – 1030 .
   Google Scholar
• Haberman , S. , von Davier , M. and Lee , Y.-H. Comparison of multidimensional item response models: Multivariate normal ability distributions versus polytomous ability distributions . ETS Research Report RR-08–45 . 2008 .
   Google Scholar
• Rupp , A. A. and Templin , J. L. 2008 . Unique characteristics of diagnostic classification models: A comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art . Measurement , 6 ( 4 ) : 219 – 262 .
   Google Scholar
• Schulze , R. 2005 . “ Modeling structures of intelligence ” . In Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence , Edited by: Wilhelm , O. and Engle , R. W. 241 – 263 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar