REFERENCES
- de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2004). Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika, 69, 333–353. doi:10.1007/BF02295640
- Hansen, M. (2013). Hierarchical item response models for cognitive diagnosis. (Dissertation dissertation), eScholarship, University of California. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6ps9d3fd.pdf.
- Hansen, M., & Cai, L. (2013). Abstract: A hierarchical item response model for cognitive diagnosis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 158–158. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.748372
- Hardy, G. H. (2004). A mathematician’s apology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (Original work published 1940)
- Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
- Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
- Rupp, A. A., Templin, J., & Henson, R. A. (2010). Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Thissen, D. (2012). Validity issues involved in cross-grade statements about NAEP results. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, NAEP Validity Studies Panel.