Pride and Prejudice and Causal Indicators

References

• Aguirre-Urreta, M. I., Rönkkö, M., & Marakas, G. M. (2016). Omission of causal indicators: Consequences and implications for measurement. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 14(3), 75–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (1984). Physics Book 2. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, Vol 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blalock, H. M. (1963). Making causal inferences for unmeasured variables from correlations among indicators. American Journal of Sociology, 69(1), 53–62. doi:10.1086/223510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (2007). Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007). Psychological Methods, 12(2), 219–228. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (2011). Evaluating effect, composite, and causal indicators in structural equation models. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 359–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Bauldry, S. (2011). Three Cs in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 265–284. doi:10.1037/a0024448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2015, September 21). In defense of causal–formative indicators: A minority report. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/met0000056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305–314. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cadogan, J., & Lee, N. (2012). Improper use of formative endogenous variables. Journal of Business Research, 66, 233–241. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadogan, J., Lee, N., & Chamberlain, L. (2013). Formative variables are unreal variables: Why the formative MIMIC model is invalid. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 3(1), 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A. (2011). Incorporating formative measures into covariance-based structural equation models. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 335–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1203–1218. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (2011). The fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 370–388. doi:10.1177/1094428110378369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guildford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. (2004). Measurement: Theory and Practice. London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, A. M., Chang, J. C.-J., Fuller, M. A., & Torkzadeh, G. (2011). Formative measurement and academic research: In search of measurement theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(2), 281–305. doi:10.1177/0013164410370208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, R. D., Breivik, E., & Wilcox, J. B. (2007). Reconsidering formative measurement. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 205–218. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (2008). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. (2010). On a distinction between causal and formative variable models: Theoretical issues and practical implications for organizational researchers. Aston University Working Paper Series 2010, Vol. RP1001, ISBN 978-1-85449-765-9.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N., & Cadogan, J. (2013). Problems with Formative and Higher-Order Reflective Variables. Journal of Business Research, 66, 242–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., Cadogan, J. W., & Chamberlain, L. (2013). The MIMIC model and formative variables: Problems and solutions. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 3(1), 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N., Cadogan, J. W., & Chamberlain, L. (2014). Material and efficient cause interpretations of the formative model: Resolving misunderstandings and clarifying conceptual language. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 4, 32–43. doi:10.1007/s13162-013-0058-5
   Google Scholar
• Markus, K. A., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Frontiers of test validity theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., van Bork, R., & Borsboom, D. (2015). Calling models with causal indicators “measurement models” implies more than they can deliver. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 13(1), 59–62. doi:10.1080/15366367.2015.1016343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, C. W., & Ehrlich, P. (1992). A brief introduction to measurement theory and to the essays. In C. W. Savage & P. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philosophical and foundational issues in measurement theory (pp. 1–15). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar