Evaluating Equating in Progress Monitoring Measures Using Multilevel Modeling

References

• Albano, A. D. (2015). A general linear method for equating with small samples. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 55–69. doi:10.1111/jedm.2015.52.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albano, A. D. (2016). equate: An R package for observed-score linking and equating. Journal of Statistical Software, 74(8), 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v074.i08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albano, A. D., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2012). Statistical equating with measures of oral reading fluency. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 43–59. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock, B., Albano, A. D., & Raymond, M. (2012). Nominal weights mean equating: A method for very small samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 608–628. doi:10.1177/0013164411428609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, J., Pickart, M., & Heistad, D. (2009). An investigation of the psychometric evidence of CBM-R passage equivalence: Utility of readability statistics and equating for alternate forms. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, R. L. (1992). Generalizability theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11, 27–34. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1992.tb00260.x
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, K. D., Park, Y., & Bauer Schaper, H. A. (2013). Form effects on dibels next oral reading fluency progress-monitoring passages. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38, 91–104. doi:10.1177/1534508412447010
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232. doi:10.1177/001440298505200303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (2000). Population invariance and the equatability of tests: Basic theory and the linear case. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 281–306. doi:10.1111/jedm.2000.37.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, D. J., Santi, K. L., Barr, C., Fletcher, J. M., Varisco, A., & Foorman, B. R. (2008). Form effects on the estimation of students’ oral reading fluency using DIBELS. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 315–342. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28, 659–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haberman, S. J., Guo, H., Liu, J., & Dorans, N. J. (2009, April). Consistency of SAT I: Reasoning test score conversions. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., & Dorans, N. J. (2006). Linking and equating. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 187–220). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., von Davier, A. A., & Chen, H. (2012). Evaluating equating results: Percent relative error for chained kernel equating. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 39–58. doi:10.1111/jedm.2012.49.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamata, A., Bauer, D. J., & Miyazaki, Y. (2008). Multilevel measurement modeling. In A. A. O’Connell & D. B. McCoach (Eds.), Multilevel modeling of educational data (pp. 345–388). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Walker, M. E., & McHale, F. (2010). Comparisons among designs for equating mixed-format tests in large-scale assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 36–53. doi:10.1111/jedm.2010.47.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolen, M. J. (2004). Linking assessments: Concepts and history. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 219–226. doi:10.1177/0146621604265030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Cahn, M. F., & Dorans, N. J. (2006). Application of score equity assessment: Invariance of linkage of new SAT and old SAT across gender groups. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 113–129. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00008.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montague, M., Penfield, R. D., Enders, C., & Huang, J. (2010). Curriculum-based measurement of math problem solving: A methodology and rationale for establishing equivalence of scores. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 39–52. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• von Davier, A. A., Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (2004). The kernel method of test equating. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar