Detecting Aberrant Response Behavior with Nonparametric Method: Mokken and PerFit Packages in RStudio

References

• Crișan, D. R., Tendeiro, J., & Meijer, R. (2019, September 24). The crit value as an effect size measure for violations of model assumptions in Mokken scale analysis for binary data. doi:10.31234/osf.io/8ydmr
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Emons, W. H. M. (2003). Detection and diagnosis of misfitting item-score vectors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/511592/111825.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Emons, W. H. M. (2008). Nonparametric person-fit analysis of polytomous item scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32(3), 224–247. doi:10.1177/0146621607302479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emons, W. H. M. (2009). Detection and diagnosis of person misfit from patterns of summed polytomous item scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(8), 599–619. doi:10.1177/0146621609334378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. New York: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Karabatsos, G. (2003). Comparing the aberrant response detection performance of thirty-six person-fit statistics. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 277–298. doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1604_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, R. R. (1996). Person-fit research: An introduction. Applied Measurement in Education, 9(1), 3–8. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0901_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, R. R. (2003). Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics. Psychological Methods, 8(1), 72. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.8.1.72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, R. R., Egberink, I. J., Emons, W. H., & Sijtsma, K. (2008). Detection and validation of unscalable item score patterns using item response theory: An illustration with Harter’s self-perception profile for children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(3), 227–238. doi:10.1080/00223890701884921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, R. R., Muijtjens, A. M. M., & van der Vlueten, C. P. M. (1996). Nonparametric person-fit research: Some theoretical issues an empirical example. Applied Measurement in Education, 9(1), 77–89. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0901_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, R. R., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Methodology review: Evaluating person-fit. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(2), 107–135. doi:10.1177/0146621012203195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokken, R. J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis: With applications in political research. The Netherlands: Mouton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, A., Tendeiro, J. N., & Younesi, J. (2016). Person fit assessment using the PerFit package in R. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3), 232–242. doi:10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p232
   Google Scholar
• Olivares, A. M. (2005). Further empirical results on parametric versus non-parametric IRT modeling of Likert-type personality data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(2), 261–279. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J., Law, Y. K., & Chan, C. K. K. (2003). A nonparametric item analysis of a selected item subset of the learning process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 395–423. doi:10.1348/000709903322275902
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (2002). Introduction to nonparametric item response theory. USA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sodano, S. M., Tracey, T. J. G., & Hafkenscheid, A. (2014). A brief Dutch language impact message inventory-circumplex (IMI-C SHORT) using non-parametric item response theory. Psychotherapy Research, 24(5), 616–628. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.847984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Štochl, J. (2007). Nonparametric extension of item response theory models and its usefulness for assessment of dimensionality of motor tests. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, 42(1), 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Štochl, J., Jones, P. B., & Croudace, J. T. (2012). Mokken scale analysis of mental health and well-being questionnaire item responses: A non-parametric IRT method in empirical research for applied health researchers. MC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 74. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Şengül Avşar, A. (2019). Comparison of person-fit statistics for polytomous items in different test conditions. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 10(4), 348–364. doi:10.21031/epod.525647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tendeiro, J. N. (2016). Package PerFit. Retrieved from https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v074i05
   Google Scholar
• Tendeiro, J. N. (2018). Package PerFit. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/PerFit/PerFit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van der Ark, L. A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(11), 1–19. doi:10.18637/jss.v020.i11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ark, L. A., Straat, J. H., & Koopman, L. (2018). Package ‘Mokken’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mokken/mokken.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van der Ark, L. A., van der Palm, D. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2011). A latent class approach to estimating test-score reliability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(5), 380–392. doi:10.1177/0146621610392911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Onna, M. J. H. (2004). Estimates of the sampling distribution of scalability coefficient H. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28(6), 427–449. doi:10.1177/0146621604268735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar