Implementation of Choice from Participants’ Perspectives: A Study of Community Mental Healthcare Reform in Sweden

References

• Andersson, M., Eklund, M., Sandlund, M., & Markström, U. (2015a). Frames for choice and market characteristics: A Swedish case study of community mental health services in change. Nordic Social Work Research, 5, 227–243. doi:10.1080/2156857x.2015.1059772
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, M., Eklund, M., Sandlund, M., & Markström, U. (2015b). Freedom of choice or cost efficiency? The implementation of a free-choice market system in community mental health services in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 18, 129–141. doi:10.1080/15017419.2014.995220
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, P., & Newberry, S. (2002). Reshaping community mental health services in a restructured state: New Zealand 1984–97. Public Management Review, 4, 187–208. doi:10.1080/14616670210130534
   Google Scholar
• Bate, P., & Robert, G. (2005). Choice. British Medical Journal, 331, 1488. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, W. (2011). Mental health day services in the United Kingdom from 1946 to 1995: An “untidy set of services”. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 554–561. doi:10.4276/030802211x13232584581371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, W., Craik, C., & McKay, E. A. (2004). Living in a glasshouse: Exploring occupational alienation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 282–289. doi:10.1177/000841740407100507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryant, W., Craik, C., & McKay, E. (2005). Perspectives of day and accommodation services for people with enduring mental illness. Journal of Mental Health, 14, 109–120. doi:10.1080/09638230500073600
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. M., Roland, M. O., & Buetow, S. A. (2000). Defining quality of care. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 1611–1625. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00057-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dowse, L. (2009). “Some people are never going to be able to do that.” Challenges for people with intellectual disability in the 21st century. Disability & Society, 24, 571–584. doi:10.1080/09687590903010933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, R. E., Bond, G. R., & Becker, D. R. (2012). Individual placement and support: An evidence-based approach to supported employment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, M., & Markström, U. (2015). Outcomes of a freedom of choice reform in community mental health day center services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 664–671. doi:10.1007/s10488-014-0601-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, M., & Tjörnstrand, C. (2013). Psychiatric rehabilitation in community-based day centres: Motivation and satisfaction. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20, 438–445. doi:10.3109/11038128.2013.805428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingrich, J. R. (2011). Making markets in the welfare state: The politics of varying market reforms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The new public management in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)e0001-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. (2007). Social care: Choice and control. In J. Hills (Ed.), Making social policy work, (pp. 147–172). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J. (2007). The other invisible hand: Delivering public services through choice and competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lövgren, V., & Hamreby, K. (2010). Factors of importance in the world of work for young people with intellectual disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 13, 91–117. doi:10.1080/15017419.2010.490742
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. S., Chamberlin, J., Ellison, M. L., & Crean, T. (1997). A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 48, 1042–1047. doi:10.1176/ps.48.8.1042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. S., Ralph, R. O., & Salzer, M. S. (2010). Validating the empowerment scale with a multisite sample of consumers of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 61, 933–936. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.61.9.933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1996). Governing “advanced” liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government, (pp. 37–64). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samele, C., Lawton-Smith, S., Warner, L., & Mariathasan, J. (2007). Patient choice in psychiatry. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(1), 1–2. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.106.031799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SFS. (2001). 453: Socialtjänstlagen [Social Service Act]. Stockholm, Sweden: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• SFS. (2008). 962: Lag om valfrihetssystem [Act on Free Choice Systems]. Stockholm, Sweden: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Slade, M. (2009). Personal recovery and mental illness: A guide for mental health professionals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. (2008). 15. LOV att välja - Lag Om Valfrihetssystem [Permission to choose: Act on Free Choice Systems]. Stockholm, Sweden: Edita Sverige AB.
   Google Scholar
• Spall, P., McDonald, C., & Zetlin, D. (2005). Fixing the system? The experience of service users of the quasi-market in disability services in Australia. Health & Social Care in the Community, 13(1), 56–63. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00529.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockholms stad. (2008). Införande av valfrihetssystem inom omsorgen enligt LSS och SoL om personer med funktionsnedsättning [Introduction of free choice systems within service granted by the Social Service Act for persons with disabilities]. Tjänsteutlåtande dnr 325–244/2008. Stockholm, Sweden: Stadsledningskontoret förnyelseavdelningen [City Renewal Management Office Department].
   Google Scholar
• Tjörnstrand, C., Bejerholm, U., & Eklund, M. (2011). Participation in day centres for people with psychiatric disabilities: Characteristics of occupations. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18, 243–253. doi:10.3109/11038128.2011.583938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsraj, K. M., & Gardner, N. (2007). Choice in mental health: Myths and possibilities. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 13(1), 60–67. doi:10.1192/apt.bp.105.002196
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2006). Quality of care: A process for making strategic choices in health systems. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar