REFERENCES
- Blecic, D.D., Wiberley, S.E., Fiscella, J.B., Bahnmaier-Blaszczak, S., & Lowery, R. (2013). Deal or no deal? Evaluating big deals and their journals. College & Research Libraries, 74(2), 178–193.
- Cook-Cottone, C., Dutt-Doner, K., & Schoen, D. (2007). Understanding student article retrieval behaviors: Instructional implications. Research Strategies, 20, 379–388.
- Imler, B., & Hall, R.A. (2009). Full-text articles: Faculty perceptions, student use and citation abuse. Reference Services Review, 37(1), 65–72.
- MacDonald, B., & Dunkelberger, R. (2000). Full-text database dependency: An emerging trend among undergraduate library users? Research Strategies, 16(4), 301–307.
- Nabe, J., & Fowler, D. (2012). Leaving the “big deal”: Consequences and next steps. The Serials Librarian, 62, 59–72.
- Sammonds, L.I. (2012). Sustainable collections: The pay-per-view model. The Serials Librarian, 63, 173–177.
- Weicher, M., & Tian, Z.X. (2012). Unbundling the “big deal” with pay-per-view of e-journal articles. The Serials Librarian, 63, 28–37.
- Weir, R., & Ireland, A. (2011). The effect of transactional access/pay per view implementation on interlibrary loan: The case of Murray State University. Interlending & Document Supply, 39(1), 40–44.