The nine-year Get it Now experiment: Using copyright clearance center’s article-delivery service long term

References

• Adams, K., & Messner, K. (2020). Analysis and Assessment of the ‘Get it Now’ Service, Five Years after Implementation - is it Fulfilling its Purpose Sustainably? Presented at ALAO Annual Conference, virtual, October 30, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. (2014). Individual article purchase: Catching the wave of the future, or getting pounded on the reef. Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. doi:10.5703/1288284315295
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K. (2000). Documents direct: Findings of the project’s trial. Chemistry, 11(2), 7.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, J. (2003). Unmediated document delivery: The issues and possibilities. The Australian Library Journal, 52(4), 327–339. doi:10.1080/00049670.2003.10721579
   Google Scholar
• Bradley University (2019). Bradley University: Statistical profile. Retrieved from http://www.bradley.edu/offices/academic/registrar/statistical/index.dot
   Google Scholar
• Brynko, B. (2011). ACRL 2011: A few new product rollouts. Information Today, 28(5), 34–35.
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, K., Fleming, R., & Hill, K. (2013). Impact of journal cancellations on interlibrary loan demand. Serials Review, 39(3), 184–187. doi:10.1080/00987913.2013.10766391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, K., & Jordan, W. (2020). Closing the loop on collections review. Serials Review, 46(3), 209–214. doi:10.1080/00987913.2020.1806647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, P. L., & Collins, M. (2009). Acquiring articles through unmediated, user-initiated pay-per-view transactions: An assessment of current practices. Serials Review, 35(4), 272–277. doi:10.1080/00987913.2009.10765255
   Google Scholar
• Chan, E. K., Mune, C., Wang, Y., & Kendall, S. L. (2016). Three years of unmediated document delivery: An analysis and consideration of collection development priorities. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 35(1), 42–51. doi:10.1080/02763869.2016.1117288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLancey, L., Smith, K., & Schultz, L. (2020). Prevalence and success of article purchasing. Technical Services Quarterly, 37(3), 256–271. doi:10.1080/07317131.2020.1768701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D., & Adams, S. J. (2018). Get It Now: Five years later. Serials Review, 44(3), 219–220. doi:10.1080/00987913.2018.1525258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fought, R. L. (2014). Breaking inertia: Increasing access to journals during a period of declining budgets: A case study. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 102(3), 192–196. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendler, G. Y., & Gudenas, J. (2016). Developing collections with Get It Now: A pilot project for a hybrid collection. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 35(4), 363–371. doi:10.1080/02763869.2016.1220751
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jarvis, C., & Gregory, J. M. (2016). Get it? Got it. Good!: Utilizing Get It Now article delivery service at a health sciences library. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 28(2), 93–100. doi:10.1080/1941126X.2016.1164556
   Google Scholar
• Jaskowiak, M., & Spires, T. (2016). The usage of ILLiad and Get It Now at a US medium-sized academic library over a three-year period. Interlending & Document Supply, 44(2), 81–87. doi:10.1108/ILDS-02-2016-0007
   Google Scholar
• Jaskowiak, M., & Spires, T. (2017, November 6). How should we get this: The use of Get It Now and other document delivery options as serials collection development tools. Presented at the Charleston Conference 2017, Charleston, SC. https://2017charlestonconference.sched.com/event/CHqI/how-should-we-get-this-the-use-of-get-it-now-and-other-document-delivery-options-as-serials-collection-development-tools.
   Google Scholar
• Jaskowiak, M., & Spires, T. (2018). Subscription alternations: Usage of canceled journal subscriptions via article delivery methods. Serials Review, 44(2), 98–103. doi:10.1080/00987913.2017.1396099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T. X. (2012). Pay-per-view, a promising model of e-articles subscription for middle/small sized academic libraries in digital age. In Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) Proceedings (Vol. 12, pp. 1–4). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Pay-per-view-article-access%3A-a-viable-replacement-Chamberlain-MacAlpine/cb9dc4fd9373852d3761cd421f9ce2533e823576
   Google Scholar