Adverse effects of 900, 1800 and 2100 MHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from mobile phones on bone and skeletal muscle

References

• Aebi, H. 1984. Catalase in vitro. Meth. Enzymol. 105:121–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akar, A., M. E. Gultiken, D. Bolat, N. Ormanci, B. K. Engiz, E. Sunan, and U. Comelekoglu. 2022. 2.45 GHz electromagnetic radiation hazard on the rat cortical femur: Morphometric and biomechanical evaluations. Medicine 11:869–76.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan, A., V. Kırdemır, A. Kocak, T. Atay, M. L. Baydar, R. A. Özerdemoglu, and N. H. Aydogan. 2014. Influence of 1800 MHz GSM-like electromagnetic radiation exposure on fracture healing. Arch. Med. Res. 45:125–31. doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2014.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslan, A., A. K. Tolga, V. Gulle, A. Kirdemir, S. Ozden, S. Comlekci, and N. H. Aydogan. 2013. Effect of 900 MHz electromagnetic fields emitted from cellular phones on fracture healing: An experimental study on rats. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 47:273–80. doi:10.3944/AOTT.2013.2854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atay, T., B. A. Aksoy, N. H. Aydogan, M. L. Baydar, M. Yildiz, and R. Ozdemir. 2009. Effect of electromagnetic field induced by radio frequency waves at 900 to 1800 MHz on bone mineral density of iliac bone wings. Arch. Craniofac. Surg. 20:1556–60. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181b78559.
   Google Scholar
• Bar–Or, D., E. Lau, and J. V. Winkler. 2000. A novel assay for cobalt-albumin binding and its potential as a marker for myocardial ischemia—a preliminary report. J Emerg Med 19:311–15. doi:10.1016/S0736-4679(00)00255-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bektas, H. 2021. Research & reviews in health sciences: 5g and health concerns. Ankara/Turkey: Gece Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bektas, H. 2022. The effects of mobile phones on diabetes and appetite. J. Int. Dent. Medical Res. 15:441–47.
   Google Scholar
• Beutler, E., O. Duron, and B. M. Kelly. 1963. Improved method for the determination of blood glutathione. J. Lab. Clin. Med 61:882–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredahl, E. C., W. Najdawi, C. Pass, J. Siedlik, J. Eckerson, and K. Drescher. 2021. Use of creatine and creatinine to minimize doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity in cardiac and skeletal muscle myoblasts. Nutr Cancer 73:2597–604. doi:10.1080/01635581.2020.1842893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, D. 2002. The contribution of the organic matrix to bone’s material properties. Bone 31:8–11. doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00815-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, M. H., J. R. Ow, N. D. Yang, and R. Taneja. 2016. Oxidative stress-mediated skeletal muscle degeneration: Molecules, mechanisms, and therapies. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016:6842568. doi:10.1155/2016/6842568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cidem, M., C. Bahadir, Y. Karakoc, and I. Karacan. 2012. Forearm bone mineral density in healthy young adult mobile phone users. Med. Sci 1:35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ciejka, E., B. Skibska, P. Kleniewska, and A. Goraca. 2010. Influence of low frequency magnetic field on chosen parameters of oxidative stress in rat’s muscles. Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski: Organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Lekarskiego 29:361–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciombor, D. M., and R. K. Aaron. 2005. The role of electrical stimulation in bone repair. Foot Ankle Clin 10:579–93. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2005.06.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dasdag, S., and M. Z. Akdag. 2016. The link between radiofrequencies emitted from wireless technologies and oxidative stress. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 75:85–93. doi:10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dial, A. G., C. M. F. Monaco, G. K. Grafham, N. Romanova, J. A. Simpson, M. A. Tarnopolsky, C. G. R. Perry, E. Kalaitzoglou, and T. J. Hawke. 2020. Muscle and serum myostatin expression in type 1 diabetes. Physiol. Rep. 8:e14500. doi:10.14814/phy2.14500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durgun, M., S. Dasdag, S. Erbatur, K. Yegin, S. O. Durgun, C. Uzun, G. Ogucu, U. Alabalik, and M. Z. Akdag. 2016. Effect of 2100 MHz mobile phone radiation on healing of mandibular fractures: An experimental study in rabbits. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 30:112–20. doi:10.1080/13102818.2015.1102612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkut, A., L. Tumkaya, M. S. Balik, Y. Kalkan, Y. Guvercin, A. Yilmaz, S. Yuce, E. Cure, and I. Sehitoglu. 2016. The effect of prenatal exposure to 1800 MHz electromagnetic field on calcineurin and bone development in rats. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira 31:74–83. doi:10.1590/S0102-865020160020000001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, J., G. Cointry, R. Capozza, R. Capiglioni, and M. Chiappe. 2001. Analysis of biomechanical effects on bone and on the muscle-bone interactions in small animal models. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 1:263–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furman, B. L. 2015. Streptozotocin‐induced diabetic models in mice and rats. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol. 70:5.47.1–5.47. 20. doi:10.1002/0471141755.ph0547s70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gürgül, S., N. Erdal, Ş. N. Yılmaz, A. Yıldız, and H. Ankaralı. 2008. Deterioration of bone quality by long-term magnetic field with extremely low frequency in rats. Bone 42:74–80. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutteridge, J. M. 1994. Biological origin of free radicals, and mechanisms of antioxidant protection. Chem. Biol. Interact. 91:133–40. doi:10.1016/0009-2797(94)90033-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, J. B., A. G. Obolensky, and P. Shinnick. 2007. The biologic effects and the therapeutic mechanism of action of electric and electromagnetic field stimulation on bone and cartilage: New findings and a review of earlier work. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 13:485–90. doi:10.1089/acm.2007.5270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell, L., and C. Sage. 2008. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomed. Pharmacother. 62:104–09. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2007.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., A. Nishida, A. Koga, S. Ikeda, A. Shiraishi, M. Uetani, K. Hayashi, and T. Nakamura. 2002. Contribution of trabecular and cortical components to the mechanical properties of bone and their regulating parameters. Bone 31:351–58. doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00830-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, H. 2018. A summary of recent literature (2007-2017) on neurological effects of radiofrequency radiation. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morabito, C., F. Rovetta, M. Bizzarri, G. Mazzoleni, G. Fanò, and M. A. Mariggiò. 2010. Modulation of redox status and calcium handling by extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields in C2C12 muscle cells: A real-time, single-cell approach. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 48:579–89. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, C. E., and C. M. Coleman. 2019. Impact of diabetes mellitus on bone health. Int J Mol Sci 20:4873. doi:10.3390/ijms20194873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazıroğlu, M., Ö. Çelik, C. Özgül, B. Çiğ, S. Doğan, R. Bal, N. Gümral, A. B. Rodríguez, and J. A. Pariente. 2012. Melatonin modulates wireless (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative injury through TRPM2 and voltage gated Ca2+ channels in brain and dorsal root ganglion in rat. Physiol. Behav. 105:683–92. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, H. O., A. Akar, C. Nisbet, M. Y. Gulbahar, A. Ozak, C. Yardimci, and S. Comlekci. 2016. Effects of electromagnetic field (1.8/0.9 GHz) exposure on growth plate in growing rats. Res. Vet. Sci. 104:24–29. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öntürk, H., and H. Özbek. 2007. Carried out of experimental diabetes and the measurement of glycemic activity. Gen. Med. J. 17:231–36.
   Google Scholar
• Özsürekci, C., G. Ş. Ayçiçek, H. Çalışkan, R. T. Doğrul, S. Neşelioğlu, M. Özcan, B. B. Doğu, M. Cankurtaran, Ö. Erel, and M. G. Halil. 2021. Thiol–disulfide homeostasis and ischemia‐modified albumin as a marker of oxidative stress in patients with sarcopenia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 21:584–89. doi:10.1111/ggi.14199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyrpasopoulou, A., V. Kotoula, A. Cheva, P. Hytiroglou, E. Nikolakaki, I. N. Magras, T. D. Xenos, T. D. Tsiboukis, and G. Karkavelas. 2004. Bone morphogenetic protein expression in newborn rat kidneys after prenatal exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Bioelectromagnetics 25:216–27. doi:10.1002/bem.10185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, G. K., L. Stehno-Bittel, S. Hamade, and C. S. Enwemeka. 2001. The biomechanical integrity of bone in experimental diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 54:1–8. doi:10.1016/S0168-8227(01)00273-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, J., and A. Ramos. 2021. In sickness and in health: The oxygen reactive species and the bone. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:745911. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.745911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraví, F. D. 2011. Asymmetries in Hip mineralization in mobile cellular phone users. J. Craniofac. Surg. 22:706–10. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e318207b79a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarfi, M. R. 2014. International and national expert group evaluations: Biological/health effects of radiofrequency fields. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:9376–408. doi:10.3390/ijerph110909376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieroń-Stołtny, K., Ł. Teister, G. Cieślar, D. Sieroń, Z. Śliwinski, M. Kucharzewski, and A. Sieroń. 2015. The influence of electromagnetic radiation generated by a mobile phone on the skeletal system of rats. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015:896019. doi:10.1155/2015/896019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares, P. B. F., C. J. Soares, P. H. J. O. Limirio, R. N. R. de Jesus, P. Dechichi, R. Spin-Neto, and D. Z. Barbosa. 2019. Effect of ionizing radiation after-therapy interval on bone: Histomorphometric and biomechanical characteristics. Clin Oral Investig 23:2785–93. doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2724-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, C. 2002. Biomechanics of bone: Determinants of skeletal fragility and bone quality. Osteoporosis International 13:97–104. doi:10.1007/s001980200000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, N. A., C. R. Denegar, and J. Preische. 2007. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field in the treatment of tibial fractures: A systematic review. J Athl Train 42:530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakymenko, I., O. Tsybulin, E. Sidorik, D. Henshel, O. Kyrylenko, and S. Kyrylenko. 2016. Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. Electromagn Biol Med 35:186–202. doi:10.3109/15368378.2015.1043557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldız, M., E. Cicek, S. S. Cerci, C. Cerci, B. Oral, and A. Koyu. 2006. Influence of electromagnetic fields and protective effect of CAPE on bone mineral density in rats. Arch. Med. Res. 37:818–21. doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar