Dynamic Change of Aggressive Behavior and Victimization Among Adolescents: Effectiveness of the ViSC Program

References

• Bovaird, J. A., & Koziol, N. A. (2012). Measurement models for ordered categorical indicators in structural equation modelling. In R. H. Hoyle, D. Kaplan, G. Marcoulides, & S. West (Eds.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 495–511). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 466–480. doi:10.1177/0165025406071904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Teacher’s corner: Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12, 471–492. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1203_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C.-M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C., Williams, K., Guerra, N., Kim, T., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 65–83. doi:10.1037/a0020149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, W., & Harel, Y. (2004). Bullying, physical fighting and victimization. In C. Currie, C. Roberts, A. Morgan, R. Smith, W. Settertobulte, & O. Samdal (Eds.), Young people’s health in context: Health behavior in school-aged children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2001/2002 survey (pp. 133–144). Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, W., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21, 22–36. doi:10.1177/0143034300211002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722. doi:10.2307/1131945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, C., Gabhainn, S. N., Godeau, E., Roberts, C., Smith, R., Currie, D., … Barnekow, V. (Eds.). (2008). Inequalities in young people’s health: HBSC international report from the 2005/06 survey. Health policy for children and adolescents, No. 5. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., Currie, D., De Looze, M., Roberts, C., … Barnekow, V. (Eds.). (2012). Social determinants of health and well-being among young people: Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6, 1–147. doi: 10.4073/csr.2009.6
   Google Scholar
• Garandeau, C. F., Lee, I. A., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). Differential effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on popular and unpopular bullies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 44–50. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradinger, P., Strohmeier, D., & Spiel, C. (2009). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification of risk groups for adjustment problems. Journal of Psychology, 217, 205–213. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the Real World. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213. doi:10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R. (2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and MIMIC approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika, 66, 373–388. doi:10.1007/BF02294440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, F. H. (2006). Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, P. H., & Williford, A. (2015). Articulating the theory of bullying intervention programs: Views from social psychology, social work, and organizational science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 3–15. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juvonen, J., Schacter, H. L., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2016). Can a school-wide bullying prevention program improve the plight of victims? Evidence for Risk × Intervention effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84, 334–344. doi:10.1037/ccp0000078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa anti-bullying program; Grades 4-6. Child Development, 82, 311–330. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Slegers, D. W., & Card, N. (2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 59–72. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1301_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malti, T., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. P. (2011). The effectiveness of two universal preventive interventions in reducing children’s externalizing behavior: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40, 677–692. doi:10.1080/15374416.2011.597084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modelling of repeated measures data. In R. B. Cattell & J. Nesselroade (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 561–614). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mevik, B.-H., & Wehrens, R. (2007). The pls package: Principal component and partial least squares regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 18, 1–24. doi:10.18637/jss.v018.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Olweus, D. (1996). The revised olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: Research Center for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center), University of Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Olweus, D. (2004). Bullying at school: Prevalence estimation, a useful evaluation design, and a new national initiative in Norway. Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry Occasional Papers, 23, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280. doi:10.1348/026151002166442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Roland, E., & Idsøe, T. (2001). Aggression and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 446–462. doi:10.1002/ab.1029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland, E., & Vaaland, G. (2006). ZERO teacher´s guide to the Zero Anti-Bullying Programme. Stavanger, Norway: Centre for Behavioural Research, University of Stavanger.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 30–44. doi:10.1002/ab.90004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultes, M.-T., Stefanek, E., van de Schoot, R., Strohmeier, D., & Spiel, C. (2014). Measuring implementation of a school-based violence prevention program: Fidelity and teachers’ responsiveness as predictors of proximal outcomes. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 222, 49–57. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of Bullies‘ Status Goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 57–67. doi:10.1002/ab.20282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, T. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Solberg, M., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239–268. doi:10.1002/ab.10047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomontos-Kountouri, O., Gradinger, P., Yanagida, T., & Strohmeier, D. (2016). The implementation and evaluation of the ViSC Program in Cyprus: Challenges of cross-national dissemination and evaluation results. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17405629.2015.1136618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiel, C., Schober, B., & Strohmeier, D. (2016). Implementing intervention research into public policy - the “I3-Approach”. Prevention Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0638-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiel, C., & Strohmeier, D. (2011). National strategy for violence prevention in Austrian schools and kindergarten: Development and implementation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 412–418. doi:10.1177/0165025411407458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiel, C., & Strohmeier, D. (2012). Evidence-based practice and policy: When researchers, policy makers, and practitioners learn how to work together. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 150–162. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.616776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiel, C., Wagner, P., & Strohmeier, D. (2012). Violence prevention in Austrian schools: Implementation and evaluation of a national strategy. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6, 176–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanek, E., Strohmeier, D., van de Schoot, R., & Spiel, C. (2011). Bully-victim behaviour in ethnically diverse classes: Risk and protective factors on the individual and classroom level. International Journal of Developmental Science, 5, 73–84. doi:10.3233/DEV-2011-11073
   Google Scholar
• Strohmeier, D., Gradinger, P., Schabmann, A., & Spiel, C. (2012a). Gewalterfahrungen von Jugendlichen. Prävalenzen und Risikogruppen [Adolescent’s experiences of violence]. In F. Eder (Ed.), PISA 2009. Nationale Zusatzerhebungen [PISA 2009. Additional National Investigations] (pp. 165–208). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Strohmeier, D., Hoffmann, C., Schiller, E.-M., Stefanek, E., & Spiel, C. (2012b). ViSC Social Competence Program. New Directions for Youth Development, 133, 71–84. doi:10.1002/yd.20008
   Google Scholar
• Swearer, S. M., & Cary, P. T. (2003). Perceptions and attitudes towards bullying in middle school youth: A developmental examination across the bully/victim continuum. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 63–79. doi:10.1300/J008v19n02_05
   Google Scholar
• Swearer, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (2004). Introduction: A social-ecological framework. of bullying among youth. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 1–12). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Trip, S., Bora, C., Sipos-Gug, S., Tocai, I., Gradinger, P., Yanagida, T., & Strohmeier, D. (2015). Bullying prevention in schools by targeting cognitions, emotions and behavior: Evaluating the effectiveness of the REBE-ViSC program. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 732–740. doi:10.1037/cou0000084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. M. K., & Donnelly, J. P. (2006). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56. doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S. (2012). Flexible imputation of missing data. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45, 1–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. J. H., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual-perspective theory. Child Development, 78, 1843–1854. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01102.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., & Barker, E. D. (2006). Subtypes of aggressive behaviors: A developmental perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 12–19. doi:10.1177/0165025406059968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Eye, A., & Spiel, C. (Eds.). (2010). Person-oriented Research. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007). School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: Update of a meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, 130–143. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanagida, T., Gradinger, P., Strohmeier, D., Solomontos-Kountouri, O., Trip, S., & Bora, C. (2016). Cross-national prevalence of traditional bullying, traditional victimization, cyberbullying and cyber-victimization: Comparing single-item and multiple-item approaches of measurement. International Journal of Developmental Science, 10, 21–32. doi:10.3233/DEV-150173
   Google Scholar
• Yang, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Different forms of bullying and victimization: Bully-victims versus bullies and victims. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 723–738. doi:10.1080/17405629.2013.793596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying programme on bully-victims, bullies and victims. Educational Research, 57(1), 80–90. doi:10.1080/00131881.2014.983724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2015). Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 36–51. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar