682
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS

Empirically-Derived Effect Size Distributions of Interventions for Young Children on the Autism Spectrum

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Bagnato, S. J., Goins, D. D., Pretti-Frontczak, K., & Neisworth, J. T. (2014). Authentic assessment as “best practice” for early childhood intervention: National consumer social validity research. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121414523652
  • Bakker, A., Cai, J., English, L., Kaiser, G., Mesa, V., & Van Dooren, W. (2019). Beyond small, medium, or large: Points of consideration when interpreting effect sizes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4
  • Ballou EP. What the neurodiversity movement does- and doesn’t offer. n.d. http://www.thinkingautismguide.com/2018/ 02/what-neurodiversity-movement-doesand.html
  • Bloom, H. S., Hill, C. J., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(4), 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802400072
  • Botha, M., Hanlon, J., & Williams, G. (2021). Does language matter? Identity-first versus person-first language use in autism research: A response to Vivanti. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04858-w
  • Bottema-Beutel, K., Crowley, S., Sandbank, M., & Woynaroski, T. (2021). Adverse event reporting in autism intervention literature for young children. Autism, 25(2), 322–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320965331
  • Chow, J. C. (2020). Commentary–Classroom motivation and learning disabilities: Consensus points and recommendations. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(2), 54–60. https://js.sagamorepub.com/ldmj/article/view/10734
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Dawson, M., & Fletcher-Watson, S. (2021). When autism researchers disregard harms: A commentary. Autism, 136236132110314. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211031403
  • French, L., & Kennedy, E. M. (2018). Annual Research Review: Early intervention for infants and young children with, or at‐risk of, autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(4), 444–456.
  • Green, J., Charman, T., McConachie, H., Aldred, C., Slonims, V., Howlin, P., … & PACT Consortium. (2010). Parent-mediated communication-focused treatment in children with autism (PACT): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 375(9732), 2152–2160.
  • Grelotti, D. J., & Kaptchuk, T. J. (2011). Placebo by proxy: Clinicians’ and family members’ feelings and perceptions about a treatment may influence their judgments about its effectiveness. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 343(7824), 599–600. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4345
  • Harris, D. N. (2009). Toward policy-relevant benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes: Combining effects with costs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373708327524
  • Hill, C. J., Bloom, H. S., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x
  • Jones, R. M., Carberry, C., Hamo, A., & Lord, C. (2017). Placebo-like response in absence of treatment in children with Autism. Autism Research, 10(9), 1567–1572. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1798
  • Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20912798
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE publications, Inc.
  • Pickles, A., Le Couteur, A., Leadbitter, K., Salomone, E., Cole-Fletcher, R., Tobin, H., & Green, J. (2016). Parent-mediated social communication therapy for young children with autism (PACT): long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 388(10059), 2501–2509.
  • Robison, J. E. (2019). Talking about autism—thoughts for researchers. Autism Research, 12(7), 1004–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2119
  • Sandbank, M., Bottema-Beutel, K., Crowley, S., Cassidy, M., Dunham, K., Feldman, J. I., Crank, J., Albarran, S. A., Raj, S., Mahbub, P., & Woynaroski, T. G. (2020). Project AIM: Autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000215
  • Sandbank, M., Chow, J., Bottema‐Beutel, K., & Woynaroski, T. (2021). Evaluating evidence‐based practice in light of the boundedness and proximity of outcomes: Capturing the scope of change. Autism Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2527
  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
  • Tanner-Smith, E. E., Durlak, J. A., & Marx, R. A. (2018). Empirically based mean effect size distributions for universal prevention programs targeting school-aged youth: A review of meta-analyses. Prevention Science, 19(8), 1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0942-1
  • Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., Polanin, J. R., Askinas, K., Stuhlsatz, M. A., Wilson, C. D., … Wilson, S. J. (2018). Investigating science education effect sizes: Implications for power analyses and programmatic decisions. AERA Open, 4(3), 2332858418791991. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418791991
  • Yoder, P. J., Bottema-Beutel, K., Woynaroski, T., Chandrasekhar, R., & Sandbank, M. (2013). Social communication intervention effects vary by dependent variable type in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Evidence-based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 7(4), 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2014.917780

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.