0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Future Directions

Future Directions in Clinical Trials and Intention-To-Treat Analysis: Fulfilling Admirable Intentions Through the Right Questions

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Angrist, J., & Pischke, J. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
  • Ashworth, E., Panayiotou, M., Humphrey, N., & Hennessey, A. (2020). Game on—complier average causal effect estimation reveals sleeper effects on academic attainment in a randomized trial of the good behavior game. Prevention Science, 21(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01074-6
  • Austin, P., & Stuart, E. (2015). Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine, 34(28), 3661–3679. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6607
  • Beidas, R. S., Edmunds, J. M., Marcus, S. C., & Kendall, P. C. (2012). Training and consultation to promote implementation of an empirically supported treatment: A randomized trial. Psychiatric Services, 63(7), 660–665. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100401
  • Breinholst, S., Esbjorn, B. H., Reinholdt-Dunne, M. L., & Stallard, P. (2012). CBT for the treatment of child anxiety disorders: A review of why parental involvement has not enhanced outcomes. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(3), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.12.014
  • Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 685–716. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.685
  • Dallal, J. (2012). Intention to treat analysis. http://www.jerrydallal.com/LHSP/itt.htm
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16(5), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063633
  • Funk, M., Westreich, D., Wiesen, C., Stürmer, T., Brookhart, M., & Davidian, M. (2011). Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. American Journal of Epidemiology, 173(7), 761–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq439
  • In-Albon, T., & Schneider, S. (2007). Psychotherapy of childhood anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics, 76(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000096361
  • Insel, T. R. (2015). The NIMH experimental medicine initiative. World Psychiatry, 14(2), 151–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20227
  • Insel, T. R., & Gogtay, N. (2014). National institute of mental health clinical trials: New opportunities, new expectations. JAMA Psychiatry, 71(7), 745–746. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.426
  • Jaccard, J. (2024). Program evaluation and randomized explanatory trials: A structural equation modeling approach. applied scientific analysis. www.explanatorytrials.com.
  • Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2020). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. Guilford Press.
  • Jung, C. G. (1981). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Princeton University Press.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Evidence-based treatment research: Advances, limitations, and next steps. American Psychologist, 66(8), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024975
  • Landes, S. J., McBain, S. A., & Curran, G. M. (2020). An introduction to effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs. Psychiatry Research, 283, 112630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112630
  • Levitt, E. E. (1957). The results of psychotherapy with children: An evaluation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(3), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039957
  • Little, R., D’Agostino, R., Cohen, M., Dickersin, K., Emerson, S. S., Farrar, J. T., Frangakis, C., Hogan, J. W., Molenberghs, G., Murphy, S. A., Neaton, J. D., Rotnitzky, A., Scharfstein, D., Shih, W. J., Siegel, J. P., & Stern, H. (2012). The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(14), 1355–1360. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr1203730
  • Luque‐Fernandez, M., Schomaker, M., Rachet, B., & Schnitzer, M. (2018). Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for a binary treatment: A tutorial. Statistics in Medicine, 37(16), 2530–2546. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7628
  • Newgard, C., & Lewis, R. (2015). Missing data: How to best account for what is not known. Journal of the American Medical Association, 314(9), 940–9411. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10516
  • Onken, L. S. (2019). History and evolution of the NIH stage model. In S. Dimidjian (Ed.), Evidence–based practice in action: bridging clinical science and intervention (pp. 28–42). Guilford.
  • Peris, T. S., Thamrin, H., & Rozenman, M. S. (2021). Family intervention for child and adolescent anxiety: A meta-analytic review of therapy targets, techniques, and outcomes. Journal of Affective Disorders, 286, 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.053
  • Pettit, J. W., Rey, Y., Bechor, M., Melendez, R., Vaclavik, D., Buitron, V., Bar-Haim, Y., Pine, D. S., & Silverman, W. K. (2017). Can less be more? Open trial of a stepped care approach for child and adolescent anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 51, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.08.004
  • Pina, A. A., Silverman, W. K., Fuentes, R. M., Kurtines, W. M., & Weems, C. F. (2003). Exposure-based cognitive-behavioral treatment for phobic and anxiety disorders: Treatment effects and maintenance for Hispanic/Latino relative to European-American youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(10), 1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200310000-00008
  • Price, R. B., Kuckertz, J. M., Amir, N., Bar‐Haim, Y., Carlbring, P., & Wallace, M. L. (2017). Less is more: Patient‐level meta‐analysis reveals paradoxical dose‐response effects of a computer‐based social anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias. Depression and Anxiety, 34(12), 1106–1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22634
  • Reynolds, S., Wilson, C., Austin, J., & Hooper, L. (2012). Effects of psychotherapy for anxiety in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(4), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.01.005
  • Robins, J. (1986). A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Mathematical Modeling, 7(9–12), 1393–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(86)90088-6
  • Schleider, J. L., Dobias, M. L., Sung, J. Y., & Mullarkey, M. C. (2020). Future directions in single-session youth mental health interventions. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 49(2), 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2019.1683852
  • Schuler, M., & Rose, S. (2017). Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for causal inference in observational studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 185(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww165
  • Silverman, W. K., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2008). The second special issue on evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents: A ten-year update. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410701817725
  • Silverman, W. K., Kurtines, W. M., & Hoagwood, K. (2004). Research progress on effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of empirically supported treatments: Integrating theory and research. Clinical Psychology Science & Practice, 11(3), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph084
  • Silverman, W. K., Pettit, J. W., & Lebowitz, E. (2016). Stepping toward making less more for concerning anxiety in children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology Science & Practice, 23(3), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12158
  • Silverman, W. K., Pina, A. A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for phobic and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410701817907
  • Silverman, W. K., Rey, Y., Marin, C. E., Jaccard, J., & Pettit, J. W. (2022). Does training parents in reinforcement skills or relationship skills enhance individual youths’ cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety? Outcome, specificity, and mediation. Clinical Psychological Science, 10(2), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026211016402
  • Snowden, J., Rose, S., & Mortimer, K. (2011). Implementation of G-computation on a simulated data set: Demonstration of a causal inference technique. American Journal of Epidemiology, 173(7), 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq472
  • Sobel, M., & Muthén, B. (2012). Compliance mixture modelling with a zero effect complier class and missing data. Biometrics Bulletin, 68(4), 1037–1045.
  • Spielmans, G. I., Pasek, L. F., & McFall, J. P. (2007). What are the active ingredients in cognitive and behavioral psychotherapy for anxious and depressed children? A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(5), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.06.001
  • Strube, M. J. (1991). Small sample failure of random assignment: A further examination. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 59(2), 346–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.2.346
  • Thulin, U., Svirsky, L., Serlachius, E., Andersson, G., & Öst, L. G. (2014). The effect of parent involvement in the treatment of anxiety disorders in children: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 43(3), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2014.923928
  • Tripepi, G., Chesnaye, N. C., Dekker, F. W., Zoccali, C., & Jager, K. J. (2020). Intention to treat and per protocol analysis in clinical trials. Nephrology, 25(7), 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.13709
  • Vansteelandt, S., & Keiding, N. (2011). Invited commentary: G-computation - lost in translation? American Journal of Epidemiology, 173(7), 739–742. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq474
  • Wang, B., Ogburn, E., & Rosenblum, M. (2019). Analysis of covariance in randomized trials: More precision and valid confidence intervals without model assumptions. Biometrics Bulletin, 75(4), 1391–1400. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13062
  • Wang, S., & Hu, H. (2022). Impute the missing data using retrieved dropouts. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01509-9

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.