Experimental investigation of quasistatic penetration tests on honeycomb sandwich panels filled with polymer foam

References

• S. Abrate, Impact on laminated composite materials, Appl. Mech. Rev., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 155–190, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• A. Niknejad and G. Liaghat, Experimental study of Poly-orthan foam filler on hexagonal honeycomb structure behavior under axial load with constant rate, in 10th Iran Aerospace Conference (AERO2011). Tarbiat Modarres University, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• A.A. Nia and M. Sadeghi, An experimental investigation on the effect of strain rate on the behaviour of bare and foam-filled aluminium honeycombs, Mater. Des. (1980–2015), vol. 52, pp. 748–756, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Goldsmith and D.L. Louie, Axial perforation of aluminum honeycombs by projectiles, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 32, no. 8–9, pp. 1017–1046, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A. Galehdari, M. Kadkhodayan, and S. Hadidi-Moud, Analytical, experimental and numerical study of a graded honeycomb structure under in-plane impact load with low velocity, Int. J. Crashworthiness, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 387–400, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.D. Papka and S. Kyriakides, In-plane compressive response and crushing of honeycomb, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1499–1532, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.D. Papka and S. Kyriakides, In-plane crushing of a polycarbonate honeycomb, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 35, no. 3–4, pp. 239–267, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Nia, S. Razavi, and G. Majzoobi, Ballistic limit determination of aluminum honeycombs—experimental study, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 488, no. 1–2, pp. 273–280, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.H. Liaghat, A.A. Nia, H.R. Daghyani, and M. Sadighi, Ballistic limit evaluation for impact of cylindrical projectiles on honeycomb panels, Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Wu and W.-S. Jiang, Axial crush of metallic honeycombs, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 19, no. 5–6, pp. 439–456, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zhao and G. Gary, Crushing behaviour of aluminium honeycombs under impact loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 827–836, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Deqiang, Z. Weihong, and W. Yanbin, Mean out-of-plane dynamic Plateau stresses of hexagonal honeycomb cores under impact loadings, Compos. Struct., vol. 92, no. 11, pp. 2609–2621, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Xu, J. H. Beynon, D. Ruan, and T. Yu, Strength enhancement of aluminium honeycombs caused by entrapped air under dynamic out-of-plane compression, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 47, pp. 1–13, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Xu, J. H. Beynon, D. Ruan, and G. Lu, Experimental study of the out-of-plane dynamic compression of hexagonal honeycombs, Compos. Struct., vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 2326–2336, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Hassanpour Roudbeneh, G. Liaghat, H. Sabouri, and H. Hadavinia, Experimental investigation of impact loading on honeycomb sandwich panels filled with foam, Int. J. Crashworthiness, pp. 1–12, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Petras, Design of Sandwich Structures, University of Cambridge, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• G. Lu and T. Yu, Energy Absorption of Structures and Materials, Elsevier, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• H. Wen, T. Reddy, S. Reid, and P. Soden, Indentation, penetration and perforation of composite laminate and sandwich panels under quasi-static and projectile loading, in Key Engineering Materials, Trans Tech Publ, pp. 501–552, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• M.H. Türk and M. S.H. Fatt, Localized damage response of composite sandwich plates, Compos. Part B: Eng., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 157–165, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• É. Lolive, and J.-M. Berthelot, Non-linear behaviour of foam cores and sandwich materials, part 2: indentation and three-point bending, J. Sandwich Struct. Mater., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 297–352, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Flores-Johnson and Q. Li, Experimental study of the indentation of sandwich panels with carbon fibre-reinforced polymer face sheets and polymeric foam core, Compos. Part B: Eng., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1212–1219, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. E. Williamson, Response Mechanisms in the Impact of Graphite/Epoxy Honeycomb Sandwich Panels, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• D. Ruan, G. Lu, and Y. C. Wong, Quasi-static indentation tests on aluminium foam sandwich panels, Compos. Struct., vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 2039–2046, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Arslan, R. Gunes, M. K. Apalak, and J. Reddy, Experimental tests and numerical modeling of ballistic impact on honeycomb sandwich structures reinforced by functionally graded plates, J. Compos. Mater., vol. 51, no. 29, pp. 4009–4028, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Nia and M. Sadeghi, The effects of foam filling on compressive response of hexagonal cell aluminum honeycombs under axial loading-experimental study, Mater. Des., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1216–1230, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Santosa and T. Wierzbicki, Crash behavior of box columns filled with aluminum honeycomb or foam, Comput. Struct., vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 343–367, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Caserta, U. Galvanetto, and L. Iannucci, Static and dynamic energy absorption of aluminum honeycombs and polymeric foams composites, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 366–376, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Demir, M. Sipahioğlu, D. Balköse, and S. Ülkü, Effect of additives on flexible PVC foam formation, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 195, no. 1–3, pp. 144–153, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Reddy and R. Wall, Axial compression of foam-filled thin-walled circular tubes, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 151–166, 1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Reid, T. Reddy, and M. Gray, Static and dynamic axial crushing of foam-filled sheet metal tubes, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 295–322, 1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Mohmmed, F. Zhang, B. Sun, and B. Gu, Static and low-velocity impact on mechanical behaviors of foam sandwiched composites with different ply angles face sheets, J. Compos. Mater., vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1173–1188, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM Standard E8M-04, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• N. Abdolrahim, G. Liaghat, and H. A. Askari, Experimental study of low velocity impact on Sandwich panels with honeycomb core and Comparison with the FEM results, ECCM13 Proceedings, vol. 49, p. 45, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International, ASTM D1622 Standard Test Method for Apparent Density of Rigid Cellular Plastics, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International, ASTM D1621 Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Cellular Plastics, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• H. Mozafari, S. Khatami, H. Molatefi, V. Crupi, G. Epasto, and E. Guglielmino, Finite element analysis of foam-filled honeycomb structures under impact loading and crashworthiness design, Int. J. Crashworthiness, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 148–160, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar