Efficient flexible multibody dynamic analysis via improved C0 absolute nodal coordinate formulation-based element

References

• J.G. De Jalon and E. Bayo, Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real-Time Challenge, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• W. Pan and E. Haug, Dynamic simulation of general flexible multibody systems, J. Struct. Mech., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 217–251, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.J. Haug, Computer aided kinematics and dynamics of mechanical systems, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• W. Schiehlen, Multibody system dynamics: Roots and perspectives, Multibody Syst. Dyn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 149–188, 1997. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009745432698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Otter et al., An Object-Oriented Data Model for Multibody Systems. Advanced Multibody System Dynamics, Springer, vol. 20, pp. 19–48, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• A.A. Shabana, Flexible multibody dynamics: review of past and recent developments, Multibody Syst. Dyn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 189–222, 1997. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009773505418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Ambrósio and M.S. Pereira, Flexibility in Multibody Dynamics with Applications to Crashworthiness. Computer-Aided Analysis of Rigid and Flexible Mechanical Systems, Springer, vol. 268, pp. 199–232, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• R.I. Arsenal, Dynamic response of a high-speed slider-crank mechanism with an elastic connecting rod, J. Eng. Ind., vol. 97, no. 2 pp. 543, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• S.K. Dwivedy and P. Eberhard, Dynamic analysis of flexible manipulators, a literature review, Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 749–777, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.W. Spong, Modeling and control of elastic joint robots, J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 310–318, 1987. DOI: 10.1115/1.3143860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ho and D. Herber, Development of dynamics and control simulation of large flexible space systems, J. Guidance Control Dyn., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 374–383, 1985. DOI: 10.2514/3.19990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Belytschko et al., Large displacement, transient analysis of space frames, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65–84, 1977. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620110108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ho, Direct path method for flexible multibody spacecraft dynamics, J. Spacecraft Rockets, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 102–110, 1977. DOI: 10.2514/3.57167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Modi et al., An approach to dynamics and control of orbiting flexible structures, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1727–1748, 1991. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620320813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Gladwell, Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 193, Springer, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Li, Coupled computational fluid dynamics/multibody dynamics method with application to wind turbine simulations, Renew. Energy, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• R. Roberson, A form of the translational dynamical equations for relative motion in systems of many non-rigid bodies, Acta Mech., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 297–308, 1972. DOI: 10.1007/BF01387376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Belytschko and B. Hsieh, Non‐linear transient finite element analysis with convected co‐ordinates, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 255–271, 1973. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620070304.
   Google Scholar
• L. Meirovitch, A new method of solution of the eigenvalue problem for gyroscopic systems, AIAA J., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1337–1342, 1974. DOI: 10.2514/3.49486.
   Google Scholar
• J.O. Song and E.J. Haug, Dynamic analysis of planar flexible mechanisms, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 359–381, 1980. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(80)90070-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Rankin and F. Brogan, An element independent corotational procedure for the treatment of large rotations, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 165–174, 1986. DOI: 10.1115/1.3264765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Belytschko and L.W. Glaum, Applications of higher order corotational stretch theories to nonlinear finite element analysis, Comput. Struct., vol. 10, no. 1–2, pp. 175–182, 1979. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(79)90085-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Shabana and R.A. Wehage, A coordinate reduction technique for dynamic analysis of spatial substructures with large angular rotations, J. Struct. Mech., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 401–431, 1983. DOI: 10.1080/03601218308907450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Geradin et al., Finite element modeling concepts in multibody dynamics. In: Computer-aided analysis of rigid and flexible mechanical systems. Springer, Dordrecht, 1994. p. 233–284.
   Google Scholar
• E. Bakr and A.A. Shabana, Geometrically nonlinear analysis of multibody systems, Comput. Struct., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 739–751, 1986. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(86)90242-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Cardona and M. Geradin, Modelling of superelements in mechanism analysis, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1565–1593, 1991. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620320805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Shabana, Dynamics of multibody systems. Cambridge university press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• A. Shabana and R. Schwertassek, Equivalence of the floating frame of reference approach and finite element formulations, Int. J. Non Linear Mech., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 417–432, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7462(97)00024-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Shabana, Definition of the slopes and the finite element absolute nodal coordinate formulation, Multibody System Dyn., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 339–348, 1997. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009740800463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Shabana et al., Application of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation to large rotation and large deformation problems, J. Mech. Design, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 188–195, 1998. DOI: 10.1115/1.2826958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Berzeri and A.A. Shabana, Development of simple models for the elastic forces in the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation, J. Sound Vib., vol. 235, no. 4, pp. 539–565, 2000. DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Gerstmayr et al., Review on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation for large deformation analysis of multibody systems, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 031016, 2013. DOI: 10.1115/1.4023487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Gerstmayr and H. Irschik, On the correct representation of bending and axial deformation in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation with an elastic line approach, J. Sound Vib., vol. 318, no. 3, pp. 461–487, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Omar and A. Shabana, A Two-Dimensional Shear Deformable Beam for Large Rotation and Deformation Problem, J. Sound Vib., vol. 243, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• A.A. Shabana and R.Y. Yakoub, Three dimensional absolute nodal coordinate formulation for beam elements: theory, J. Mech. Design, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 606–613, 2001. DOI: 10.1115/1.1410100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Dmitrochenko and A. Mikkola, Two simple triangular plate elements based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 041012, 2008. DOI: 10.1115/1.2960479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Dmitrochenko and D.Y. Pogorelov, Generalization of plate finite elements for absolute nodal coordinate formulation, Multibody Syst. Dyn., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17–43, 2003. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024553708730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Vaziri Sereshk and M. Salimi, Comparison of finite element method based on nodal displacement and absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) in thin shell analysis, Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1185–1198, 2011. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Dufva and A. Shabana, Analysis of thin plate structures using the absolute nodal coordinate formulation, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K: J. Multi-Body Dyn., vol. 219, no. 4, pp. 345–355, 2005. DOI: 10.1243/146441905X50678.
   Google Scholar
• A.M. Mikkola and M.K. Matikainen, Development of elastic forces for a large deformation plate element based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 103–108, 2006. DOI: 10.1115/1.1961870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Mikkola and A.A. Shabana, A non-incremental finite element procedure for the analysis of large deformation of plates and shells in mechanical system applications, Multibody Syst. Dyn., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 283–309, 2003. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022950912782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Abbas et al., Plate/shell element of variable thickness based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K: J. Multi-Body Dyn., vol. 224, no. 2, pp. 127–141, 2010. DOI: 10.1243/14644193JMBD244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J.T. Sopanen and A.M. Mikkola, Description of elastic forces in absolute nodal coordinate formulation, Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 34, no. 1/2, pp. 53–74, 2003. DOI: 10.1023/B:NODY.0000014552.68786.bc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Olshevskiy et al., Three-and four-noded planar elements using absolute nodal coordinate formulation, Multibody Syst. Dyn., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 255–269, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s11044-012-9314-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Olshevskiy et al., Three-dimensional solid brick element using slopes in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 021001, 2014. DOI: 10.1115/1.4024910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Olshevskiy et al., Absolute nodal coordinate formulation of tetrahedral solid element, Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 2457–2471, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s11071-017-3389-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Kübler et al., Flexible multibody systems with large deformations and nonlinear structural damping using absolute nodal coordinates, Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 34, no. 1/2, pp. 31–52, 2003. DOI: 10.1023/B:NODY.0000014551.75105.b4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.L. Schwab and J.P. Meijaard, Comparison of three-dimensional flexible beam elements for dynamic analysis: finite element method and absolute nodal coordinate formulation, vol. 6, pp. 1341–1349, 2005. DOI: 10.1115/DETC2005-85104.
   Google Scholar
• E.L. Wilson et al., Incompatible Displacement Models, Numer. and Comput. Methods in Struct. Mech., pp. 43–57, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• R.L. Taylor et al., A non-conforming element for stress analysis, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1211–1219, 1976. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620100602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Berkooz et al., The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 539–575, 1993. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fl.25.010193.002543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Kerschen et al., The method of proper orthogonal decomposition for dynamical characterization and order reduction of mechanical systems: An overview, Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 41, no. 1–3, pp. 147–169, 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s11071-005-2803-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.C. Liang et al., Proper orthogonal decomposition and its applications—Part I: Theory, J. Sound Vib., vol. 252, no. 3, pp. 527–544, 2002. DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.4041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABAQUS/CAE User Manual. Abaqus 6.12 Documentation.
   Google Scholar