Experimental and simulation investigation on thermal and mechanical properties for the hollow sphere reinforced AZ31 magnesium matrix composite

References

• L. M. Fulton, and P. Cazzola, Light-duty vehicle fuel economy, energy use, and CO2 global trends and opportunities, In Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting., 2009. Washington DC, United States, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• C. Han, Research on the development and application of lightweight automotive materials, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1676, pp. 012085, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• D. D. Luong, N. Gupta, and P. K. Rohatgi, The high strain rate compressive response of Mg-Al alloy/fly Ash cenosphere composites, JOM., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 48–52, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s11837-011-0028-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kumar, R. K. Phanden, and L. Thakur, A review on environment friendly and lightweight Magnesium-Based metal matrix composites and alloys, Mater. Today Proc., vol. 38, pp. 359–364, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• T. Pollock, Materials science. Weight loss with magnesium alloys, Science., vol. 328, no. 5981, pp. 986–987, 2010. DOI: 10.1126/science.1182848.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. Taub, E. D. Moor, A. Luo, D. K. Matlock, J. G. Speer, and U. Vaidya, Materials for Automotive Lightweighting, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 327–359, 2019. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010134.
   Google Scholar
• R. A. Witik, J. Payet, V. Michaud, C. Ludwig, and J. A. E. Månson, Assessing the life cycle costs and environmental performance of lightweight materials in automobile applications, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1694–1709, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Furuya, N. Kogiso, S. Matunaga, and K. Senda, Applications of magnesium alloys for aerospace structure systems, MSF., vol. 350-351, pp. 341–348, 2000. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.350-351.341.
   Google Scholar
• J. E. Gray, and B. Luan, Protective coatings on magnesium and its alloys — a critical review, J. Alloys Compd., vol. 336, no. 1-2, pp. 88–113, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(01)01899-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Ma, D. He, X. Li, and J. Jiang, Microstructure and mechanical properties of magnesium alloy AZ31B brazed joint using a Zn-Mg-Al filler metal, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 743–746, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/S1005-0302(10)60117-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Chen, L. Liu, J. Liu, and F. Pan, Microstructure, electromagnetic shielding effectiveness and mechanical properties of Mg–Zn–Y–Zr alloys, Mater. Des., vol. 65, pp. 360–369, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Z. Ye, and X. Y. Liu, Review of recent studies in magnesium matrix composites, J. Mater. Sci., vol. 39, no. 20, pp. 6153–6171, 2004. DOI: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000043583.47148.31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Emamy, H. Abdizadeh, H. R. Lashgari, and A. A. Najimi, The effect of Sr and grain refining elements on the microstructure and tensile properties of A356-10%B4C metal matrix composite, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 210–217, 2011. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2010.516884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Najimi, M. Emamy, and H. R. Lashgari, The effect of simultaneous addition of Ca and Sr on the microstructure and tensile properties of A357-20% Al2O3 composite, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 201–209, 2011. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2010.516883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Pani, S. R. Routray, R. R. Panda, and S. Singh, A critical review on hybrid aluminum metal matrix composite, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1706, pp. 012195, 2020. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1706/1/012195.
   Google Scholar
• E. Karthick, J. Mathai, J. M. Tony, and S. K. Marikkannan, Processing, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al2O3 and SiC Reinforced Magnesium Metal Matrix Hybrid Composites, Mater. Today Proc., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 6750–6756, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.451.
   Google Scholar
• D. Dash, S. Samanta, and R. N. Rai, Studies on Synthesis of Magnesium Based Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs), Mater. Today Proc., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 20110–20116, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.378.
   Google Scholar
• T. Thirugnanasambandham, J. Chandradass, P. B. Sethupathi, and M. L. J. Martin, Experimental study of wear characteristics of Al2O3 reinforced magnesium based metal matrix composites, Mater. Today Proc., vol. 14, pp. 211–218, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.04.140.
   Google Scholar
• F. D. Queiroz, P. Vellasco, and DAJJoCSR. Nethercot, Finite element modeling of composite beams with full and partial shear connection, J Constr Steel Res., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 505–521, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhang, G. Zhao, T. Lu, and S. He, Strain rate behavior of closed-cell Al-Si-Ti Foams: experiment and numerical modeling, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 556–563, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2013.828813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. Granados, X. Martinez, N. Nash, C. Bachour, I. Manolakis, A. Comer, and D. Di Capua, Numerical and experimental procedure for material calibration using the serial/parallel mixing theory, to analyze different composite failure modes, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 1415–1433, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2019.1675106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Song, L. Chen, S. Hao, and P. Wang, Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete slab, J. Tianjin Inst. Technol., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 29–31, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Sun, Y. Zhao, J. Wu, X. Kai, Z. Zhang, Z. Fang, and C. Xia, Effects of particulate agglomerated degree on deformation behaviors and mechanical properties of in-situ ZrB2 nanoparticles reinforced AA6016 matrix composites by finite element modeling, Mater. Res. Express., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 036507, 2020. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab7b27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. J. Jang, J.-B. Kim, and H. Shin, Identification of plastic constitutive Johnson–Cook model parameters by optimization-based inverse method, J. Comput. Des. Eng., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1082–1097, 2021. DOI: 10.1093/jcde/qwab033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Doner, S. Nayak, K. Senol, A. Shukla, N. M. A. Krishnan, I. K. Yilmazcoban, and S. Dasa, Dynamic compressive behavior of metallic particulate-reinforced cementitious composites: SHPB experiments and numerical simulations, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 227, pp. 116668, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Wang, H. Ma, L. Zhao, and G. Yang, Studies on the dynamic compressive properties of open-celled aluminum alloy foams, Scr. Mater., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 83–87, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Wang, J. Shen, G. Lu, and L. Zhao, Compressive behavior of closed-cell aluminum alloy foams at medium strain rates, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., vol. 528, no. 6, pp. 2326–2330, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Han, H. Cheng, Q. Wang, and Z. Li, The strain rate effect of an open cell aluminum foam, Metall. And Mat. Trans. A., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 645–650, 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-005-0180-6.
   Google Scholar
• L. Licitra, D. D. Luong, O. M. Strbik III, and N. Gupta, Dynamic properties of alumina hollow particle filled aluminum alloy A356 matrix syntactic foams, Mater. Des., vol. 66, pp. 504–515, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. K. Balch, G. Davis, C. M. Cady, G. Gray, and D. Dunand, Plasticity and damage in aluminum syntactic foams deformed under dynamic and quasi-static conditions, Mat. Sci. Eng., vol. 391, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• L. Peroni, M. Scapin, C. Fichera, D. Lehmhus, J. Weise, J. Baumeister, and M. Avalle, Investigation of the mechanical behaviour of AISI 316L stainless steel syntactic foams at different strain-rates, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 66, pp. 430–442, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar