On the estimation process of a particular class of global transmissibility functions: the R-FRFs

References

• D. Ewins, Modal Testing: Theory, Practice and Application, Engineering Dynamics Series, Wiley, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• W. Fan, and P. Qiao, Vibration-based damage identification methods: A review and comparative study, Struct. Health Monit., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 83–111, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Farrar, S. Doebling, and D. Nix, Vibration-based structural damage identification, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 359, no. 1778, pp. 131–149, 2001. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2000.0717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Montalvão, N. Maia, and A. Ribeiro, A review of vibration-based structural health monitoring with special emphasis on composite materials, Shock Vib. Digest., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 295–324, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• O. Salawu, Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: A review, Eng. Struct., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 718–723, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00149-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ribeiro, On the generalization of the transmissibility concept, in Proceedings of NATO/ASI Conference on Modal Analysis and Testing, (Sesimbra, Portugal), pp. 757–764, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• R. Sampaio, N. Maia, A. Ribeiro, and J. Silva, Damage detection using the transmissibility concept, in Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 2559–2568, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ribeiro, J. Silva, and N. Maia, On the generalisation of the transmissibility concept, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2000. DOI: 10.1006/mssp.1999.1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. M. M. Maia, A. P. V. Urgueira, and R. A. B. Almeida, Whys and wherefores of transmissibility, in Vibration Analysis and Control, F. Beltran-Carbajal, Ed., ch. 10, Rijeka: IntechOpen, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• N. M. Maia, R. A. Almeida, A. P. Urgueira, and R. P. Sampaio, Damage detection and quantification using transmissibility, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 2475–2483, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Chesné, and A. Deraemaeker, Damage localization using transmissibility functions: A critical review, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 569–584, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.-J. Yan, M.-Y. Zhao, Q. Sun, and W.-X. Ren, Transmissibility-based system identification for structural health monitoring: Fundamentals, approaches, and applications, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., vol. 117, pp. 453–482, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.06.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Cheng, and A. Cigada, An analytical perspective about structural damage identification based on transmissibility function, Struct. Health Monit., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 142–155, 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1475921719838079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Messina, Local diagnoses in modal analysis through additional poles, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 928–937, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2019.1614704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Messina, L. Soria, and G. Mantriota, Experimental analyses on local diagnoses through additional poles extracted by R-FRFs, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 28, no. 17, pp. 1765–1774, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2019.1705448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Allemang, D. L. Brown, and R. Rost, Experimental modal analysis and dynamic component synthesis, Meas. Tech. Exp. Modal Anal., vol. 2, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• J. S. Bendat, and A. G. Piersol, Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, vol. 729. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• P. Guillaume, Identification of multi-input multi-output systems using frequency-domain models, PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Ixelles, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• P. Guillaume, R. Pintelon, and J. Schoukens, Nonparametric frequency response function estimators based on nonlinear averaging techniques, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 739–746, 1992. DOI: 10.1109/19.199393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Leclère, N. Roozen, and C. Sandier, On the use of the Hs estimator for the experimental assessment of transmissibility matrices, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., vol. 43, no. 1–2, pp. 237–245, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Schoukens, and R. Pintelon, Measurement of Frequency Response Functions in Noisy Environments, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 905–909, 1990. DOI: 10.1109/19.65795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. White, M. Tan, and J. Hammond, Analysis of the maximum likelihood, total least squares and principal component approaches for frequency response function estimation, J. Sound Vib., vol. 290, no. 3-5, pp. 676–689, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.04.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Fladung, Windows used for impact testing, in Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference - IMAC, vol. 2, 1997, pp. 1662–1666.
   Google Scholar