Optimal reliable design of brake disk using a Kriging surrogate model

References

• G. M. Nathi, T. N. Charyulu, K. Gowtham, and P. Satish Reddy, Coupled structural/thermal analysis of disc brake, IJRET., vol. 01, no. 04, pp. 539–553, 2012. DOI: 10.15623/ijret.2012.0104004.
   Google Scholar
• T. V. Manjunath, and P. M. Suresh, Structural and thermal analysis of rotor disc of disc brake, Int. J. Innovative Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 7741–7749, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• S. Sarip, Design development of lightweight disc brake for regenerative braking-finite element analysis, IJAPM., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 52–58, 2013. DOI: 10.7763/IJAPM.2013.V3.173.
   Google Scholar
• A. Chen, and F. Kienhöfer, The failure prediction of a brake disc due to nonthermal or mechanical stresses, Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 124, pp. 105319, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Cabboi, and J. Woodhouse, Identifying short-term variation of dynamic friction by means of its frequency response function, J. Sound Vib., vol. 472, pp. 115212, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Sawczuk, D. Ulbrich, J. Kowalczyk, and A. Merkisz-Guranowska, Evaluation of wear of disc brake friction linings and the variability of the friction coefficient on the basis of vibroacoustic signals, Sensors, vol. 21, no. 17, pp. 5927, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/s21175927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Papinniemi, J.C.S. Lai, and J. Zhao, Disc brake squeal: progress and challenges, ICSV14, Cairns, Australia, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• M. Kuciej, The comparable analysis of temperature distributions assessment in disc brake obtained using analytical method and fe model, J. Kones, vol. 18, pp. 235–259, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• V. Chengal Reddy, M. Gunasekhar Reddy, and G. Harinath Gowd, Modeling and analysis of fsae car disc brake using fem, Int. J. Emerging Technol. Adv. Eng., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 383–389, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Wang, J. Han, J. P. Domblesky, Z. Li, X. Fan, and X. Liu, Crack propagation and microstructural transformation on the friction surface of a high-speed railway brake disc, Wear, vol. 428-429, pp. 45–54, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2019.01.124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Sawczuk, Analytical model coefficient of friction (cof) of rail disc brake on the basis of multi-phase stationary tests, Eksploatacja i Niezawodność., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 57–67, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Talati, and S. Jalalifar, Investigation of heat transfer phenomena in a ventilated disk brake rotor with straight radial rounded vanes, J. of Appl. Sci., vol. 8, no. 20, pp. 3583–3592, 2008. DOI: 10.3923/jas.2008.3583.3592.
   Google Scholar
• B. Ali, and B. Mostefa, Thermal behavior of dry contacts in the brake discs, IJAE., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2012. DOI: 10.20485/jsaeijae.3.1_9.
   Google Scholar
• H. B. Yan, S. S. Feng, X. H. Yang, and T. J. Lu, Role of cross-drilled holes in enhanced cooling of ventilated brake discs, Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 91, pp. 318–333, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Kharmanda, A. Mohamed, and M. Lemaire, Efficient reliability-based design optimization using hybrid space with application to finite element analysis, Struct. Multidisc. Optim., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 233–245, 2002. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-002-0233-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Kharmanda, S. Sharabatey, H. Ibrahim, A. Makhloufi, and A. El Hami, Reliability-based design optimization using semi-numerical strategies for structural engineering applications, Int. J. CAD/CAM, vol. 9, pp. 1–16, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hui Lü, and Dejie Yu, Optimization design of a disc brake system with hybrid uncertainties, Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 98, pp. 112–122, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Dammak, A. El Hami, S. Koubaa, L. Walha, and M. Haddar, Reliability based design optimization of coupled acoustic-structure system using generalized polynomial chaos, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 134, pp. 75–84, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Yaich, G. Kharmanda, A. El Hami, L. Walha, and M. Haddar, Reliability based design optimization for multiaxial fatigue damage analysis using robust hybrid method, J. Mech., vol. 44, pp. 1–16, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• K. Dammak, A. Yaich, A. El Hami, L. Walha, and M. Haddar, An efficient optimization based on the robust hybrid method for the coupled acoustic–structural system, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 27, no. 21, pp. 1816–1826, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2018.1525629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kamel, K. Dammak, M. Yangui, A. El Hami, M. B. Jdidia, L. Hammami, and M. Haddar, A reliability optimization of a coupled soil structure interaction applied to an offshore wind turbine, Appl. Ocean Res., vol. 113, pp. 102641, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2021.102641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Debich, A. El Hami, A. Yaich, W. Gafsi, L. Walha, and M. Haddar, An efficient reliability-based design optimization study for pcm-based heat-sink used for cooling electronic devices, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., pp. 1–13, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2020.1836291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Debich, A. Yaich, K. Dammak, A. El Hami, W. Gafsi, L. Walha, and M. Haddar, Integration of multi-objective reliability-based design optimization into thermal energy management: Application on phase change material-based heat sinks, J. Storage. Mater., vol. 41, pp. 102906, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kamel, K. Dammak, A. El Hami, M. Ben Jdidia, L. Hammami, and M. Haddar, A modified hybrid method for a reliability-based design optimization applied to an offshore wind turbine, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., pp. 1–14, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2020.1811927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Dammak, and A. El Hami, Thermal reliability-based design optimization using kriging model of pcm based pin fin heat sink, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 166, pp. 120745, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Dammak, and A. El Hami, Multi-objective reliability based design optimization of coupled acoustic-structural system, Eng. Struct., vol. 197, pp. 109389, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Forrester, A. Sobester, and A. Keane, Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide, Wiley, New York, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• R. Jin, X. Du, and W. Chen, The use of metamodeling techniques for optimization under uncertainty, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., no. 2, vol. 25, pp. 99–116, 2003. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-002-0277-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Dey, T. Mukhopadhyay, and S. Adhikari, Metamodel based high-fidelity stochastic analysis of composite laminates: A concise review with critical comparative assessment, Compos. Struct., vol. 171, pp. 227–250, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Abid, L. Walha, and M. Haddar, Surrogate models for uncertainty analysis of micro-actuator, Microsyst. Technol. no. 8, vol. 26, pp. 2589–2512, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00542-020-04799-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.D. Pantula, S.S. Miriyala, and K. Mitra, Kernel: enabler to build smart surrogates for online optimization and knowledge discovery, Mater. Manuf. Processes., vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1162–1171, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2016.1269918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.D. Pantula, and K. Mitra, A data-driven approach towards finding closer estimates of optimal solutions under uncertainty for an energy efficient steel casting process, Energy, vol. 189, pp. 116253, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.D. Pantula, and K. Mitra, Towards efficient robust optimization using data based optimal segmentation of uncertain space, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 197, pp. 106821, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Dammak, and A. El Hami, Multi-objective reliability based design optimization using kriging surrogate model for cementless hip prosthesis, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 854–867, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1768247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. W. Simpson, J. Peplinski, P. N. Koch, and J. K. Allen, On the use of statistics in design and the implications for deterministic computer experiments. In: Proceedings of the ASME 1997 Design Engineering Technical Conferences. Volume 3: 9th International Design Theory and Methodology Conference. Sacramento, California, USA. September 14–17, 1997. ASME. DOI: 10.1115/DETC97/DTM-3881.
   Google Scholar
• R. H. Myers, and D. C. Montgomery, Response surface methodology, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• D. J. Lizotte, R. Greiner, and D. Schuurmans, An experimental methodology for response surface optimization methods, J. Glob. Optim., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 699–736, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s10898-011-9732-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Immonen, 2d shape optimization under proximity constraints by cfd and response surface methodology, Appl. Math. Modell., vol. 41, pp. 508–529, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2016.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Janusevskis, and R. Le Riche, Simultaneous kriging-based estimation and optimization of mean response, J. Glob. Optim., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 313–336, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s10898-011-9836-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakraborty, S. Dey, S. Adhikari, and R. Chowdhury, A critical assessment of kriging model variants for high-fidelity uncertainty quantification in dynamics of composite shells, Arch. Computat. Methods Eng., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 495–518, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s11831-016-9178-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Shi, Z. Lu, L. Xu, and S. Chen, An adaptive multiple-kriging-surrogate method for time-dependent reliability analysis, Appl. Math. Modell., vol. 70, pp. 545– 571, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2019.01.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Soumitri Miriyala, P. Mittal, S. Majumdar, and K. Mitra, Comparative study of surrogate approaches while optimizing computationally expensive reaction networks, Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 140, pp. 44–61, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.09.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Soumitri Miriyala, V. R. Subramanian, and K. Mitra, Transform-ann for online optimization of complex industrial processes: Casting process as case study, Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 264, no. 1, pp. 294–309, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Durgude, A. Vipradas, S. Kishore, and S. Nimse, Design optimisation of brake disc geometry, Technical report, MAE 598-2016-11, Final Report of Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• N. Stander, W. Roux, T. Goel, T. Eggleston, and K. Craig, Ls-opt user’s manual, Technical report, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, California, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• A. B. Ryberg, B. R. Domeij, and L. Nilsson, Metamodel-based multidisciplinary design optimization for automotive applications, Technical report, Linkping University, Division of Solid Mechanics, September, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• M. Meckesheimer, R. R. Barton, T. W. Simpson, and A. J. Booker. Computationally Inexpensive Metamodel Assessment Strategies. Proceedings of the ASME 2001 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 2A: 27th Design Automation Conference. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. September 9–12, 2001. pp. 191–201. ASME. DOI: 10.1115/DETC2001/DAC-21028
   Google Scholar
• F. Abid, A. Hami, T. Merzouki, L. Walha, and M. Haddar. An approach for the reliability-based design optimization of shape memory alloy structure, Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach., no. 2, vol. 49, pagespp. 155–117, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/15397734.2019.1665541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. D. McKay, R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, no. 2, vol. 21, pp. 239–245, 1979. DOI: 10.2307/1268522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. B. Nielsen, S. N. Lophaven, J. Sndergaard, and A. Dace, A matlab kriging toolbox, Technical report, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, 2002.
   Google Scholar