Enhanced high-strain-rate impact resistance of helicoidal composites by fused deposition modelling

References

• H. Jopek and T. Strek, Torsion of a two-phased composite bar with helical distribution of constituents, Phys. Status Solidi B., vol. 254, no. 12, pp. 1700050, 2017. DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201700050.
   Google Scholar
• H.H. Tsang and S. Raza, Impact energy absorption of bio-inspired tubular sections with structural hierarchy, Compos. Struct., vol. 195, pp. 199–210, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Yin, et al., In-plane crashworthiness of bio-inspired hierarchical honeycombs, Compos. Struct., vol. 192, pp. 516–527, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Morano, P. Zavattieri, and M. Alfano, Tuning energy dissipation in damage tolerant bio-inspired interfaces, J. Mech. Phys. Solids., vol. 141, pp. 103965, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2020.103965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y-x Guo, M-q Yuan, and X-m Qian, Bionic stab-resistant body armor based on triangular pyramid structure, Defence Technol., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 792–799, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2020.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.G. Wegst, et al., Bioinspired structural materials, Nat. Mater., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 23–36, 2015. DOI: 10.1038/nmat4089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Yang, et al., AFM identification of beetle exocuticle: bouligand structure and nanofiber anisotropic elastic properties, Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1603993, 2017. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201603993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Weaver, et al., The stomatopod dactyl club: a formidable damage-tolerant biological hammer, Science., vol. 336, no. 6086, pp. 1275–1280, 2012. DOI: 10.1126/science.1218764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odontodactylus scyllarus. Available from: https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E9%9B%80%E5%B0%BE%E8%9E%B3%E8%9E%82%E8%99%BE/2613126?fromtitle=Odontodactylus%20scyllarus&fromid=49878822&fr=aladdin.
   Google Scholar
• N. Suksangpanya, et al., Crack twisting and toughening strategies in Bouligand architectures, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 150, pp. 83–106, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Hosome, S. Zaike, and T. Matsumoto, Bending characteristics of helicoidal laminated CFRP, Procedia Eng., vol. 171, pp. 1325–1331, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.430.
   Google Scholar
• H.-O. Fabritius, et al., Influence of structural principles on the mechanics of a biological fiber-based composite material with hierarchical organization: the exoskeleton of the lobsterhomarus americanus, Adv. Mater., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 391–400, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200801219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.K. Grunenfelder, et al., Bio-inspired impact-resistant composites, Acta Biomater., vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 3997–4008, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Guarin-Zapata, et al., Shear wave filtering in naturally-occurring Bouligand structures, Acta Biomater., vol. 23, pp. 11–20, 2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Jia, et al., An experimental investigation of the temperature effect on the mechanics of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 154, pp. 53–63, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Guarín-Zapata, et al., Bandgap tuning in bioinspired helicoidal composites, J. Mech. Phys. Solids., vol. 131, pp. 344–357, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Ribbans, Y. Li, and T. Tan, A bioinspired study on the interlaminar shear resistance of helicoidal fiber structures, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 56, pp. 57–67, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Suksangpanya, et al., Twisting cracks in Bouligand structures, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 76, pp. 38–57, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Hu, W. Liu, and Y. Shi, Low-velocity impact damage research on CFRPs with Kevlar-fiber toughening, Compos. Struct., vol. 216, pp. 127–141, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.K. Bhudolia, and S.C. Joshi, Low-velocity impact response of carbon fibre composites with novel liquid Methylmethacrylate thermoplastic matrix, Compos. Struct., vol. 203, pp. 696–708, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Long, X. Yao, and X. Zhang, Delamination prediction in composite laminates under low-velocity impact, Compos. Struct., vol. 132, pp. 290–298, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Zhang and K.T. Tan, Low-velocity impact response and compression after impact behavior of tubular composite sandwich structures, Compos Part B Eng., vol. 193, pp. 108026, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Vieille, V.M. Casado, and C. Bouvet, About the impact behavior of woven-ply carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic- and thermosetting-composites: A comparative study, Compos. Struct., vol. 101, pp. 9–21, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Matadi Boumbimba, et al., Glass fibres reinforced acrylic thermoplastic resin-based tri-block copolymers composites: Low velocity impact response at various temperatures, Compos. Struct., vol. 160, pp. 939–951, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Liu, H.P. Lee, and V.B.C. Tan, Failure mechanisms in bioinspired helicoidal laminates, Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 157, pp. 99–106, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ginzburg, et al., Damage tolerance of bio-inspired helicoidal composites under low velocity impact, Compos. Struct., vol. 161, pp. 187–203, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Liu, H.P. Lee, and V.B.C. Tan, Effects of inter-ply angles on the failure mechanisms in bioinspired helicoidal laminates, Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 165, pp. 282–289, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.07.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.S. Sikarwar, R. Velmurugan, and N.K. Gupta, Influence of fiber orientation and thickness on the response of glass/epoxy composites subjected to impact loading, Compos Part B Eng., vol. 60, pp. 627–636, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Chen, et al., Experimental investigation on normal and oblique ballistic impact behavior of fiber metal laminates, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., vol. 32, no. 23, pp. 1769–1778, 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0731684413498434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Jiang, et al., Low-velocity impact resistance behaviors of bio-inspired helicoidal composite laminates with non-linear rotation angle based layups, Compos. Struct., vol. 214, pp. 463–475, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Mahesh, S. Joladarashi, and S.M. Kulkarni, Damage mechanics and energy absorption capabilities of natural fiber reinforced elastomeric based bio composite for sacrificial structural applications, Defence Technol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 161–176, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2020.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Mahesh, S. Joladarashi, and S.M. Kulkarni, Comparative study on ballistic impact response of neat fabric, compliant, hybrid compliant and stiff composite, Thin-Wall Struct., vol. 165, pp. 107986, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.107986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Mahesh, D. Harursampath, and V. Mahesh, An experimental study on ballistic impact response of jute reinforced polyethylene glycol and nano silica based shear thickening fluid composite, Defence Technol., 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2021.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hu, et al., Dynamic compressive behavior of woven flax-epoxy-laminated composites, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 117, pp. 63–74, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Arbaoui, M. Tarfaoui, and A. El Malki Alaoui, Mechanical behavior and damage kinetics of woven E-glass/vinylester laminate composites under high strain rate dynamic compressive loading: Experimental and numerical investigation, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 87, pp. 44–54, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Gao, et al., The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering, Comput-Aided. Des., vol. 69, pp. 65–89, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Li, G. Link, and J. Jelonnek, 3D microwave printing temperature control of continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 187, pp. 107939, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Yazdani Sarvestani, et al., 3D printed architected polymeric sandwich panels: Energy absorption and structural performance, Compos. Struct., vol. 200, pp. 886–909, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Lei, et al., 3D printed two-dimensional periodic structures with tailored in-plane dynamic responses and fracture behaviors, Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 159, pp. 189–198, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.02.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Matsuzaki, et al., Three-dimensional printing of continuous-fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation, Sci. Rep., vol. 6, pp. 23058, 2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Li, et al., Numerical investigation of composite laminate subjected to combined loadings with blast and fragments, Compos. Struct., vol. 214, pp. 335–347, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar