Experimental and numerical investigation of sheet metal failure based on Johnson-Cook model and Erichsen test over a wide range of temperatures

References

• A. E. Tekkaya, P. O. Bouchard, S. Bruschi, and C. C. Tasan, Damage in metal forming, CIRP Ann., vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 600–623, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2020.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Abbassi, F. Ahmad, S. Gulzar, T. Belhadj, A. Karrech, and H. S. Choi, Design of T-shaped tube hydroforming using finite element and artificial neural network modeling, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1129–1138, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s12206-020-0214-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. L. Gurson, Porous rigid-plastic materials containing rigid inclusions—yield function, plastic potential, and void nucleation, in: D.M.R. Taplin (Ed.) The Physical Metallurgy of Fracture. Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1978. pp. 357–364
   Google Scholar
• G. R. Johnson, and W. H. Cook, Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31–48, 1985. DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Cao, Y. Zhen, M. Song, H. Yi, F. Li, and X. Li, Determination of Johnson–Cook parameters and evaluation of Charpy impact test performance for X80 pipeline steel, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 179, pp. 105627, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Xue, X. Ling, and S. Yang, Mechanical behaviour and strain rate sensitivity analysis of TA2 by the small punch test, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., vol. 99, pp. 9–17, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Saxena, A. Kumaraswamy, S. P. Dwivedi, A. K. Srivastava, and N. K. Maurya, Experimental and computational investigation on dynamic fracture toughness (J1d) behavior of multi-pass SMA armor steel weldments, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., vol. 106, pp. 102502, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Li, and S. Cui, Grain modeling and finite element simulation of damage evolution for AA5182-O aluminum alloy sheet, J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 10559–10575, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.089.
   Google Scholar
• F. Abbassi, T. Belhadj, S. Mistou, and A. Zghal, Parameter identification of a mechanical ductile damage using Artificial Neural Networks in sheet metal forming, Mater. Design, vol. 45, pp. 605–615, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Abbassi, O. Pantalé, S. Mistou, A. Zghal, and R. Rakotomalala, Effect of Ductile Damage Evolution in Sheet Metal Forming: Experimental and Numerical Investigations, KEM, vol. 446, pp. 157–169, 2010. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.446.157.
   Google Scholar
• F. Abbassi, M. Srinivasan, C. Loganathan, R. Narayanasamy, and M. Gupta, Experimental and numerical analyses of magnesium alloy hot workability, J. Magnesium Alloys, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 295–301, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2016.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. H. J. Peerlings, H. R. Javani, J. Mediavilla, and M. G. D. Geers, Modelling of damage initiation and propagation in metal forming, Int. J. Mater. Form., vol. 1, NO. S1, pp. 1123–1126, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s12289-008-0177-y.
   Google Scholar
• S. Toros, F. Ozturk, and I. Kacar, Review of warm forming of aluminum–magnesium alloys, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 207, no. 1–3, pp. 1–12, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ghaffari Tari, M. J. Worswick, and S. Winkler, Experimental studies of deep drawing of AZ31B magnesium alloy sheet under various thermal conditions, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 213, no. 8, pp. 1337–1347, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.01.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Laurent, J. Coër, P. Y. Manach, M. C. Oliveira, and L. F. Menezes, Experimental and numerical studies on the warm deep drawing of an Al–Mg alloy, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 93, pp. 59–72, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, Y-b Luo, P. Friedman, M-h Chen, and L. Gao, Warm forming behavior of high strength aluminum alloy AA7075, Transact. N. Metals Soc. China, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61131-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kurukuri, A. H. van den Boogaard, A. Miroux, and B. Holmedal, Warm forming simulation of Al–Mg sheet, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 209, no. 15–16, pp. 5636–5645, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Li, and A. K. Ghosh, Biaxial warm forming behavior of aluminum sheet alloys, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 281–293, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Shao, et al., Experimental investigation of forming limit curves and deformation features in warm forming of an aluminium alloy, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B: J. Eng. Manufact., vol. 232, no. 3, pp. 465–474, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0954405416645776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. S. Panicker, K. S. Prasad, S. Basak, and S. K. Panda, Constitutive behavior and deep drawability of three aluminum alloys under different temperatures and deformation speeds, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 3954–3969, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-017-2837-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Abedrabbo, F. Pourboghrat, and J. Carsley, Forming of AA5182-O and AA5754-O at elevated temperatures using coupled thermo-mechanical finite element models, Int. J. Plast., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 841–875, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Abedrabbo, F. Pourboghrat, and J. Carsley, Forming of aluminum alloys at elevated temperatures – Part 2: Numerical modeling and experimental verification, Int. J. Plast., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 342–373, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. P. Martins, J. L. Alves, D. M. Neto, M. C. Oliveira, and L. F. Menezes, Numerical analysis of different heating systems for warm sheet metal forming, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 83, no. 5–8, pp. 897–909, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7618-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. S. Kim, M. Koç, and J. Ni, Development of an analytical model for warm deep drawing of aluminum alloys, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 197, no. 1–3, pp. 393–407, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Mayavan, L. Karthikeyan, and V. S. Senthilkumar, Experimental and numerical studies on isothermal and non-isothermal deep drawing of IS 513 CR3 steel sheets, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 4837–4847, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-016-2325-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Vafaeenezhad, S. H. Seyedein, M. R. Aboutalebi, and A. R. Eivani, Using high temperature tensile testing data to analyze hot formability of Sn-5Sb alloy: instability and critical damage criteria, J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 4159–4172, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.02.043.
   Google Scholar
• F. Abbassi, S. Mistou, and A. Zghal, Failure analysis based on microvoid growth for sheet metal during uniaxial and biaxial tensile tests, Mater. Design, vol. 49, pp. 638–646, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Jebri, F. Abbassi, M. Demiral, M. Soula, and F. Ahmad, Experimental and numerical analysis of progressive damage and failure behavior of carbon Woven-PPS, Compos. Struct., vol. 243, pp. 112234, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAli Kouka, F. Abbassi, M. Demiral, F. Ahmad, M. Soula, and F. Al Housni, Behaviour of woven-ply PPS thermoplastic laminates with interacting circular holes under tensile loading: An experimental and numerical study, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 251, pp. 107802, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 20482: Metallic Materials – Sheet and Strip – Erichsen Cupping Test. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• R. Hill, The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1950. pp. 317–340.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Iqbal, A. Chakrabarti, S. Beniwal, and N. K. Gupta, 3D numerical simulations of sharp nosed projectile impact on ductile targets, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 185–195, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Johnson, and W. Cook, A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures, in Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, pp. 541–547, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• A. M. Vemula, G. Chandra Mohan Reddy, and M. Manzoor Hussain, Comparison of experimental and simulation results using erichsen cupping test of titanium alloy OT 4–1, Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 45, pp. 2096–2104, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.632.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Cheong, F. S. Sorce, S. Ngo, C. Lowe, and A. C. Taylor, The effect of substrate material properties on the failure behaviour of coatings in the Erichsen cupping test, Prog. Org. Coat., vol. 151, pp. 106087, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.106087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Gao, et al., Investigation on mechanical behavior and plastic damage of AA7075 aluminum alloy by thermal small punch test: Experimental trials, numerical analysis, J. Manuf. Processes, vol. 50, pp. 1–16, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar