Design of mechanically compatible lattice structures cancellous bone fabricated by fused filament fabrication of Z-ABS material

References

• Xuewen. Chen, et al., Design and mechanical compatibility of nylon bionic cancellous bone fabricated by selective laser sintering, Material., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1965, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ma14081965.
   Google Scholar
• Yuting. Lv, et al., Metal material, properties and design methods of porous biomedical scaffolds for additive manufacturing: A review, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., vol. 9, no. March, pp. 1–16, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.641130.
   Google Scholar
• Salah. Ramtani, H. Bennaceur, and T. Outtas, Elastic bone-column buckling including bone density gradient effect within the context of adaptive elasticity, IRBM., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 267–277, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2015.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefania. Pagani, et al., Mechanical and in vitro biological properties of uniform and graded Cobalt-chrome lattice structures in orthopedic implants, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. - Part B Appl. Biomater., pp. 1–13, 2021. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. S. L. Bobbert, et al., Additively manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on minimal surfaces: A unique combination of topological, mechanical, and mass transport properties, Acta Biomater., vol. 53, pp. 572–584, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Van Der Stok, et al., Full regeneration of segmental bone defects using porous titanium implants loaded with Bmp-2 containing fibrin gels, Eur Cell Mater., vol. 29, pp. 141–154, 2015. DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v029a11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun. Li, X. Cui, G. J. Hooper, K. S. Lim, and T. B. F. Woodfield, Rational design, bio-functionalization and biological performance of hybrid additive manufactured titanium implants for orthopaedic applications: A review, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 105, pp. 103671, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youwen. Yang, et al., Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds, Int. J. Bioprinting., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2019. DOI: 10.18063/IJB.v5i1.148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshiki. Oshida, Bioscience and bioengineering of titanium materials, Biosci. Bioeng. Titan. Mater., 2007. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-045142-8.X5000-2.
   Google Scholar
• OlaLA. Harrysson, O. Cansizoglu, D. J. Marcellin-Little, D. R. Cormier, and H. A. West, Direct metal fabrication of titanium implants with tailored materials and mechanical properties using electron beam melting technology, Mater. Sci. Eng. C., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 366–373, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2007.04.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaki. Alomar, and F. Concli, A review of the selective laser melting lattice structures and their numerical models, Adv. Eng. Mater., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2000611, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/adem.202000611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chengxiong. Lin, Y. Wang, Z. Huang, T. Wu, and W. Xu, Advances in filament structure of 3D bioprinted biodegradable bone repair scaffolds, Int. J. Bioprint., vol. 7, no. iv, pp. 43–64, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Tullio. Genova, I. Roato, M. Carossa, C. Motta, D. Cavagnetto, and F. Mussano, Advances on bone substitutes through 3D bioprinting, IJMS., vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 7012–7028, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197012.
   Google Scholar
• EbrahimAA. Alkebsi, H. Ameddah, T. Outtas, and A. Almutawakel, Design of graded lattice structures in turbine blades using topology optimization, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 370–384, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/0951192X.2021.1872106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AliaaM. Abou-Ali, O. Al-Ketan, R. Rowshan, and R. Abu Al-Rub, Mechanical response of 3D printed bending-dominated ligament-based triply periodic cellular polymeric solids, J. Mater Eng Perform., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 2316–2326, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-019-03982-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oraib. Al-Ketan, and R. K. Abu Al-Rub, Multifunctional mechanical metamaterials based on triply periodic minimal surface lattices, Adv. Eng. Mater., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1900524, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/adem.201900524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ksawery. Szykiedans, and W. Credo, Mechanical properties of FDM and SLA low-cost 3-D prints, Procedia Eng., vol. 136, pp. 257–262, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.207.
   Google Scholar
• Anatolie. Timercan, V. Sheremetyev, and V. Brailovski, Mechanical properties and fluid permeability of gyroid and diamond lattice structures for intervertebral devices: functional requirements and comparative analysis, Sci Technol Adv Mater., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 285–300, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/14686996.2021.1907222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chengxing. Yang, P. Xu, S. Xie, and S. Yao, Mechanical performances of four lattice materials guided by topology optimisation, Scr. Mater., vol. 178, pp. 339–345, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.11.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlmoutazBellah. Alsamawi, N. Boumechra, and K. Hamdaoui, Numerical parametric study of fully encased composite columns subjected to cyclic loading, Civ Eng J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 2022. DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-01-04.
   Google Scholar
• Yogesh. Tripathi, M. Shukla, and A. D. Bhatt, Implicit-function-based design and additive manufacturing of triply periodic minimal surfaces scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, J. of Materi Eng and Perform., vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 7445–7451, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-019-04457-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuexin. Du, et al., Laser additive manufacturing of bio-inspired lattice structure: Forming quality, microstructure and energy absorption behavior, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., vol. 773, no. vember 2019, pp. 138857, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138857.
   Google Scholar
• Fuping. Li, J. Li, G. Xu, G. Liu, H. Kou, and L. Zhou, Fabrication, pore structure and compressive behavior of anisotropic porous titanium for human trabecular bone implant applications, J Mech Behav Biomed Mater., vol. 46, pp. 104–114, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YunFei. Fu, B. Rolfe, L. N. S. Chiu, Y. Wang, X. Huang, and K. Ghabraie, Design and experimental validation of self-supporting topologies for additive manufacturing, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 382–394, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2019.1637023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias. Maconachie, et al., The compressive behaviour of ABS gyroid lattice structures manufactured by fused deposition modelling, Int J Adv Manuf Technol., vol. 107, no. 11-12, pp. 4449–4467, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05239-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuo. Zhang, S. Vijayavenkataraman, W. F. Lu, and J. Y. H. Fuh, A review on the use of computational methods to characterize, design, and optimize tissue engineering scaffolds, with a potential in 3D printing fabrication, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater., vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 1329–1351, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayanthi. Parthasarathy, B. Starly, S. Raman, and A. Christensen, Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM), J Mech Behav Biomed Mater., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 249–259, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. E. I. 604: 1999. Plastics-determination of compressive properties. British Standard.
   Google Scholar
• I. Diamant, R. Shahar, Y. Masharawi, and A. Gefen, A method for patient-specific evaluation of vertebral cancellous bone strength: In vitro validation, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 282–291, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RyanE. Tomlinson, and M. J. Silva, Skeletal blood flow in bone repair and maintenance, Bone Res., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 311–322, 2013. DOI: 10.4248/BR201304002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar