Finite element analyses of porous dental implant designs based on 3D printing concept to evaluate biomechanical behaviors of healthy and osteoporotic bones

References

• J. Li, J.A. Jansen, X.F. Walboomers, and J.J. van den Beucken, Mechanical aspects of dental implants and osseointegration: A narrative review, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 103, p. 103574, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Vidal, et al., Titanium scaffolds by direct ink writing: Fabrication and functionalization to guide osteoblast behavior, Metals, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1118–1156, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/met10091156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.E. Romanos, R.A. Delgado-Ruiz, D. Sacks, and J.L. Calvo-Guirado, Influence of the implant diameter and bone quality on the primary stability of porous tantalum trabecular metal dental implants: An in vitro biomechanical study, Clin. Oral Implants Res., vol. 29, no. 6. pp. 649–655, Jun. 2018. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Yamako, et al. , Improving stress shielding following total hip arthroplasty by using a femoral stem made of β type Ti-33.6Nb-4Sn with a Young's modulus gradation, J. Biomech., vol. 63, pp. 135–143, Oct. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Lascano, et al., Porous titanium for biomedical applications: Evaluation of the conventional powder metallurgy frontier and space-holder technique, Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 5, p. 982, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/app9050982.
   Google Scholar
• A. Rodriguez-Contreras, M. Punset, J.A. Calero, F.J. Gil, E. Ruperez, and J.M. Manero, Powder metallurgy with space holder for porous titanium implants: A review, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., vol. 76, pp. 129–149, Jun. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Liverani, G. Rogati, S. Pagani, S. Brogini, A. Fortunato, and P. Caravaggi, Mechanical interaction between additive-manufactured metal lattice structures and bone in compression: Implications for stress shielding of orthopaedic implants, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 121, p. 104608, Sep. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Domínguez-Trujillo, et al., Improvement of the balance between a reduced stress shielding and bone ingrowth by bioactive coatings onto porous titanium substrates, Surf. Coat. Technol., vol. 338, pp. 32–37, Mar. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Manoj, A.K. Kasar, and P.L. Menezes, Tribocorrosion of porous titanium used in biomedical applications, J. Bio- Tribo-Corros., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3, Mar. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s40735-018-0194-4.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Chen, et al., Influence of the pore size and porosity of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V ELI porous scaffold on cell proliferation, osteogenesis and bone ingrowth, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., vol. 106, p. pp. 110289, Jan. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Li, et al., Bone ingrowth in porous titanium implants produced by 3D fiber deposition, Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 18, pp. 2810–2820, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Liu, et al., Effect of porous microstructures on the biomechanical characteristics of a root analogue implant: An animal study and a finite element analysis, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 6356–6367, Nov. 2020. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Bari, and A. Arjunan, Extra low interstitial titanium based fully porous morphological bone scaffolds manufactured using selective laser melting, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 95, pp. 1–12, Jul. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.03.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kholgh Eshkalak, E. Rezvani Ghomi, Y. Dai, D. Choudhury, and S. Ramakrishna, The role of three-dimensional printing in healthcare and medicine, Mater. Des., vol. 194, p. pp. 108940, Sep. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kumar, M. Kumar, and J.S. Chohan, The role of additive manufacturing for biomedical applications: A critical review, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 64, pp. 828–850, Apr. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Salmi, Additive manufacturing processes in medical applications, Materials, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 191, Jan. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ma14010191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Revilla-León, M. Sadeghpour, and M. Özcan, A review of the applications of additive manufacturing technologies used to fabricate metals in implant dentistry, J. Prosthodont., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 579–593, Aug. 2020. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Y. Wei, Y. Hu, M. Li, and D. Li, Fabrication of Sr-functionalized micro/nano-hierarchical structure ceramic coatings on 3D printing titanium, Surf. Eng., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 373–380, Mar. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/02670844.2020.1748349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ghods, et al., Powder reuse and its contribution to porosity in additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V, Materialia, vol. 15, p. 100992, Mar. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100992.
   Google Scholar
• M. Vignesh, et al., Development of biomedical implants through additive manufacturing: A review, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 4735–4744, Jul. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-021-05578-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Tan, et al., Additive manufacturing of bio-inspired multi-scale hierarchically strengthened lattice structures, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 167, p. 103764, Aug. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, S. Gomes, and A. Bernard, Bio-inspired generative design for support structure generation and optimization in Additive Manufacturing (AM), CIRP Ann., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 117–120, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2020.04.091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Doblaré, J.M. Garcı́a, and M.J. Gómez, Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: A review, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 71, no. 13–14, pp. 1809–1840, Sep. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Anitua, N. Larrazabal Saez de Ibarra, I. Morales Martín, and L. Saracho Rotaeche, Influence of dental implant diameter and bone quality on the biomechanics of single-crown restoration. a finite element analysis, Dent. J., vol. 9, no. 9, p. 103, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/dj9090103.
   Google Scholar
• G. Osterhoff, E.F. Morgan, S.J. Shefelbine, L. Karim, L.M. McNamara, and P. Augat, Bone mechanical properties and changes with osteoporosis, Injury., vol. 47, pp. S11–S20, Jun. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)47003-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Florencio-Silva, GRdaS. Sasso, E. Sasso-Cerri, M.J. Simões, and P.S. Cerri, Biology of bone tissue: Structure, function, and factors that influence bone cells, Biomed. Res. Int., vol. 2015, pp. 1–17, 2015. DOI: 10.1155/2015/421746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.C. Cowin , Wolff's law of trabecular architecture at remodeling equilibrium, J. Biomech. Eng., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 83–88, Feb. 1986. DOI: 10.1115/1.3138584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.M. Frost , Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's law: The bone modeling problem, Anat Rec., vol. 226, no. 4, pp. 403–413, Apr. 1990. DOI: 10.1002/ar.1092260402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• H.M. Frost, A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s Law for clinicians, Angle Orthod., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 3–15, Feb. 2004. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074 < 0003:AUOBPA>2.0.CO;2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.S. Beaupré, T.E. Orr, and D.R. Carter, An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling-theoretical development, J Orthop Res., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 651–661, Sep. 1990. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100080506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.C. Cowin, and D.H. Hegedus, Bone remodeling I: Theory of adaptive elasticity, J Elast., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 313–326, Jul. 1976. DOI: 10.1007/BF00041724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Huiskes, H. Weinans, H.J. Grootenboer, M. Dalstra, B. Fudala, and T.J. Slooff, Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis, J. Biomech., vol. 20, no. 11-12, pp. 1135–1150, Jan. 1987. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90030-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Madeo, D. George, T. Lekszycki, M. Nierenberger, and Y. Rémond, A second gradient continuum model accounting for some effects of micro-structure on reconstructed bone remodelling, Comptes Rendus Mécanique., vol. 340, no. 8, pp. 575–589, Aug. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.crme.2012.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Merdji, et al., Stress distribution in dental prosthesis under an occlusal combined dynamic loading, Mater. Des., vol. 36, pp. 705–713, Apr. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.M.S. Duarte, J.R. Andrade, L. M. J. S. Dinis, R.M.N. Jorge, and J. Belinha, Numerical analysis of dental implants using a new advanced discretization technique, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 467–479, Apr. 2016. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2014.987410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Jia, F. Li, C. Zhang, K. Liu, and Y. Zhang, Design and simulation analysis of Lattice bone plate based on finite element method,” Mech, Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 1311–1321, Jul. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2019.1665759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.-S. Son, H. Mehboob, and S.-H. Chang, Simulation of the bone healing process of fractured long bones applied with a composite bone plate with consideration of the blood vessel growth, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 58, pp. 443–450, Mar. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mehboob, et al., A novel design, analysis and 3D printing of Ti-6Al-4V alloy bio-inspired porous femoral stem, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., vol. 31, no. 9, p. pp. 78, Sep. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-020-06420-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mehboob, F. Ahmad, F. Tarlochan, A. Mehboob, and S.H. Chang, A comprehensive analysis of bio-inspired design of femoral stem on primary and secondary stabilities using mechanoregulatory algorithm, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 2213–2226, Dec. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-020-01334-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Z. E.-A. Arab, et al., Finite-element analysis of a lateral femoro-tibial impact on the total knee arthroplasty, Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed., vol. 192, p. 105446, Aug. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mehboob, F. Tarlochan, A. Mehboob, and S.-H. Chang, Finite element modelling and characterization of 3D cellular microstructures for the design of a cementless biomimetic porous hip stem, Mater. Des., vol. 149, pp. 101–112, Jul. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Benaissa, A. Merdji, M.Z. Bendjaballah, P. Ngan, and O.M. Mukdadi, Stress influence on orthodontic system components under simulated treatment loadings, Comput Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 195, pp. 105569, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mehboob, S.H.A. Rizvi, S.-H. Chang, and H. Mehboob, Comparative study of healing fractured tibia assembled with various composite bone plates, Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 197, p. 108248, Sep. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Tarlochan, H. Mehboob, A. Mehboob, and S.-H. Chang, Influence of functionally graded pores on bone ingrowth in cementless hip prosthesis: A finite element study using mechano-regulatory algorithm, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 701–716, Jun. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-017-0987-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mehboob, H. Mehboob, and S.-H. Chang, Evaluation of unidirectional BGF/PLA and Mg/PLA biodegradable composites bone plates-scaffolds assembly for critical segmental fractures healing, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 135, p. 105929, Aug. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mehboob, J. Kim, A. Mehboob, and S.-H. Chang, How post-operative rehabilitation exercises influence the healing process of radial bone shaft fractures fixed by a composite bone plate, Compos. Struct., vol. 159, pp. 307–315, Jan. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.E. Alkhatib, F. Tarlochan, H. Mehboob, R. Singh, K.Kadirgama, and W. Harun, Finite element study of functionallygraded porous femoral stems incorporating bodycentered cubicstructure, Artif. Organs., vol. 43, no. 7, pp. E152–E164, 2019. DOI: 10.1111/aor.13444.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mehboob, H. Mehboob, S.-H. Chang, and F. Tarlochan, Effect of composite intramedullary nails (IM) on healing of long bone fractures by means of reamed and unreamed methods, Compos. Struct., vol. 167, pp. 76–87, May 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-M. Huang, I.-C. Chou, C.-P. Jiang, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-Y. Lee, Finite element analysis of dental implant neck effects on primary stability and osseointegration in a type IV bone mandible, Biomed. Mater. Eng., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1407–1415, 2014. DOI: 10.3233/BME-130945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Ausiello, et al., The role of cortical zone level and prosthetic platform angle in dental implant mechanical response: A 3D finite element analysis, Dent. Mater., vol. 37, pp. 1688-1697, Sep. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.022.
   Google Scholar
• M.-D. Jeng, Y.-S. Lin, and C.-L. Lin, Biomechanical evaluation of the effects of implant neck wall thickness and abutment screw size: A 3D nonlinear finite element analysis, Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 10, p. 3471, May 2020. DOI: 10.3390/app10103471.
   Google Scholar
• P. Marcián, J. Wolff, L. Horáčková, J. Kaiser, T. Zikmund, and L. Borák, Micro finite element analysis of dental implants under different loading conditions, Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 96, pp. 157–165, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mehboob, A. Mehboob, F. Abbassi, F. Ahmad, A.S. Khan, and S. Miran, Bioinspired porous dental implants using the concept of 3D printing to investigate the effect of implant type and porosity on patient’s bone condition, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., pp. 1–15, Sep. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1971347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kasani, B.K. Rama Sai Attili, V.K. Dommeti, A. Merdji, J.K. Biswas, and S. Roy , Stress distribution of overdenture using odd number implants - a finite element study, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 98, no. May, pp. 369–382, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.030.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C.A.A. Lemos, et al., Effect of bone quality and bone loss level around internal and external connection implants: A finite element analysis study, J. Prosthet. Dent., vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 137.e1–137.e10, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.M. Jones, Deformation Theory of Plasticity; Blacksburg, Virginia, Bull Ridge Corporation, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• C. Öhman, et al., Compressive behaviour of child and adult cortical bone, Bone, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 769–776, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.06.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Liu, et al., The optimization of Ti gradient porous structure involves the finite element simulation analysis, Front. Mater., pp. 1–11, vol. 8, Jun. 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fmats.2021.642135.
   Google Scholar
• L.C. Gerhardt, and A.R. Boccaccini, Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Materials (Basel)., vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 3867–3910, 2010. DOI: 10.3390/ma3073867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.F. Morgan, and T.M. Keaveny, Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site, J. Biomech., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 569–577, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00011-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.J. Quevedo González, et al., Mechanical performance of cementless total knee replacements: It is not all about the maximum loads, J. Orthop. Res., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 350–357, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/jor.24194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mahnama, M. Tafazzoli-Shadpour, F. Geramipanah, and M. Mehdi Dehghan, Verification of the mechanostat theory in mandible remodeling after tooth extraction: Animal study and numerical modeling, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 20, pp. 354–362, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.02.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Korabi, K. Shemtov-Yona, A. Dorogoy, and D. Rittel, The failure envelope concept applied to the bone-dental implant system, Sci. Rep., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2017. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02282-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J.P.M. Kan, R.B. Judge, and J.E.A. Palamara, In vitro bone strain analysis of implant following occlusal overload, Clin. Oral Implants Res., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 73–82, 2014. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Pałka, and R. Pokrowiecki, Porous titanium implants: A review, Adv. Eng. Mater., vol. 20, no. 5, p. 1700648, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/adem.201700648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.J. Wally, W. van Grunsven, F. Claeyssens, R. Goodall, and G.C. Reilly, Porous titanium for dental implant applications, Metals, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1902–1920, 2015. DOI: 10.3390/met5041902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Pokrowiecki, A. Mielczarek, T. Zaręba, and S. Tyski, Oral microbiome and peri-implant diseases: Where are we now?, Ther. Clin. Risk Manag., vol. 13, pp. 1529–1542, 2017. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S139795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. El-Gazzar, and W. Högler, Mechanisms of bone fragility: From osteogenesis imperfecta to secondary osteoporosis, Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 618–625, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.J. Sego, Y.-T. Hsu, T.-M. G. Chu, and A. Tovar, On the significance and predicted functional effects of the crown-to-implant ratio: A finite element study of long-term implant stability using high-resolution, nonlinear numerical analysis, in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Nov. 2016. DOI: 10.1115/IMECE2016-67654.
   Google Scholar
• O.M. Ugarte, et al., Can maxilla and mandible bone quality explain differences in orthodontic mini-implant failures?, Biomater. Investig. Dent., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Jan. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1863155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. Civantos, et al., In vitro bone cell behavior on porous titanium samples: Influence of porosity by loose sintering and space holder techniques, Metals, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 696, May 2020. DOI: 10.3390/met10050696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Crovace, et al., 3D biomimetic porous titanium (Ti6Al4V ELI) scaffolds for large bone critical defect reconstruction: An experimental study in sheep, Animals, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 1389, Aug. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ani10081389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar