Mechanical properties of hybrid structures generated by additively manufactured triply periodic minimal surface structures and foam

References

• T. Maconachie, M. Leary, B. Lozanovski, et al., SLM lattice structures: Properties, performance, applications and challenges, Mater. Des., vol. 183, pp. 108137, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Miltz, and O. Ramon, Energy absorption characteristics of polymeric foams used as cushioning materials, Polym. Eng. Sci., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 129–133, 1990. DOI: 10.1002/pen.760300210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Podroužek, M. Marcon, K. Ninčević, and R. Wan-Wendner, Bio-inspired 3D infill patterns for additive manufacturing and structural applications, Materials, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 499, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ma12030499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Zouzias, G. De Bruyne, R. Miralbes, and J. Ivens, Characterization of the tensile behavior of expanded polystyrene foam as a function of density and strain rate, Adv. Eng. Mater., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2000794, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/adem.202000794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Miralbes, D. Ranz, F. J. Pascual, et al., Characterization of additively manufactured triply periodic minimal surface structures under compressive loading, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 1841–1855, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2020.1842948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Avalle, G. Belingardi, and R. Montanini, Characterization of polymeric structural foams under compressive impact loading by means of energy-absorption diagram, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 455–472, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-J. Hwang, K.-S. Kim, B. AlMangour, et al., A new approach for manufacturing stochastic pure magnesium foam by laser powder bed fusion: Fabrication, geometrical characteristics, and compressive mechanical properties, Adv. Eng. Mater., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2100483, 2021. DOI: 10.1002/adem.202100483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Fernandes, R. Alves de Sousa, M. Ptak, and G. Migueis, Helmet design based on the optimization of biocomposite energy-absorbing liners under multi-impact loading, Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 735, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/app9040735.
   Google Scholar
• J. C. Najmon, J. DeHart, Z. Wood, and A. Tovar, Cellular helmet liner design through bio-inspired structures and topology optimization of compliant mechanism lattices, SAE Int. J. Trans. Safety, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 217–235, 2018. DOI: 10.4271/2018-01-1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Abderezaei, F. Rezayaraghi, B. Kain, et al., An overview of the effectiveness of bicycle helmet designs in impact testing, Front Bioeng. Biotechnol., vol. 9, pp. 718407, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.718407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. H. Blanco, A. Cernicchi, and U. Galvanetto, Design of an innovative optimized motorcycle helmet, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part P J. Sports Eng. Technol., vol. 228, no. 2, pp. 95–110, 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1754337113518748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mustafa, T. Y. Pang, T. Ellena, and S. H. Nasir, Impact attenuation of user-centred bicycle helmet design with different foam densities, J. Phys: Conf. Ser., vol. 1150, pp. 12043, 2019. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1150/1/012043.
   Google Scholar
• J. Michio Clark, A. Post, T. Blaine Hoshizaki, and M. D. Gilchrist, Distribution of brain strain in the cerebrum for laboratory impacts to ice hockey goaltender masks, J. Biomech Eng., vol. 140, pp. 121007, 2018. DOI: 10.1115/1.4040605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. F. Khosroshahi, H. Duckworth, U. Galvanetto, and M. Ghajari, The effects of topology and relative density of lattice liners on traumatic brain injury mitigation, J. Biomech., vol. 97, pp. 109376, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Y. Pang, K. T. Thai, A. S. McIntosh, et al., Head and neck responses in oblique motorcycle helmet impacts: A novel laboratory test method, Int J Crashworthiness., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297–307, 2011. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2011.559799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Bliven, A. Rouhier, S. Tsai, et al., Evaluation of a novel bicycle helmet concept in oblique impact testing, Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 124, pp. 58–65, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. G. Kroeker, M. Ç. Özkul, A. L. DeMarco, et al., Density variation in the expanded polystyrene foam of bicycle helmets and its influence on impact performance, J Biomech Eng., vol. 142, pp. 41012, 2020. DOI: 10.1115/1.4045709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. J. Gibson, and M. F. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• S. Higuera, R. Miralbes, and D. Ranz, Mechanical properties and energy–absorption capabilities of thermoplastic sheet gyroid structures, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., pp. 1–15, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1919803.
   Google Scholar
• N. Novak, O. Al-Ketan, L. Krstulović-Opara, et al., Quasi-static and dynamic compressive behaviour of sheet TPMS cellular structures, Compos. Struct., vol. 266, pp. 113801, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Miralbes, S. Higuera, D. Ranz, and J. A. Gomez, Comparative analysis of mechanical properties and energy absorption capabilities of functionally graded and non-graded thermoplastic sheet gyroid structures, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., pp. 1–14, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1949509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Afshar, A. P. Anaraki, H. Montazerian, and J. Kadkhodapour, Additive manufacturing and mechanical characterization of graded porosity scaffolds designed based on triply periodic minimal surface architectures, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 62, pp. 481–494, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Novak, O. Al-Ketan, M. Borovinšek, et al., Development of novel hybrid TPMS cellular lattices and their mechanical characterisation, J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 15, pp. 1318–1329, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.08.092.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Zhang, M.-T. Hsieh, and L. Valdevit, Mechanical performance of 3D printed interpenetrating phase composites with spinodal topologies, Compos Struct., vol. 263, pp. 113693, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Zhang, Y. Yang, M. Xu, et al., Mechanical properties of multi-materials porous structures based on triply periodic minimal surface fabricated by additive manufacturing, RPJ., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1681–1692, 2021. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-10-2020-0254.
   Google Scholar
• S. Yu, J. Sun, and J. Bai, Investigation of functionally graded TPMS structures fabricated by additive manufacturing, Mater. Des., vol. 182, pp. 108021, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Peng, Q. Huang, Y. Zhang, et al., Elastic response of anisotropic gyroid cellular structures under compression: Parametric analysis, Mater. Des., vol. 205, pp. 109706, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Khaleghi, F. N. Dehnavi, M. Baghani, et al., On the directional elastic modulus of the TPMS structures and a novel hybridization method to control anisotropy, Mater. Des., vol. 210, pp. 110074, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Barber, C. N. Kelly, K. Nelson, and K. Gall, Compressive anisotropy of sheet and strut based porous Ti–6Al–4V scaffolds, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 115, pp. 104243, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Neff, N. Hopkinson, and N. B. Crane, Experimental and analytical investigation of mechanical behavior of laser-sintered diamond-lattice structures, Addit. Manuf., vol. 22, pp. 807–816, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. Ahmadi, G. Campoli, S. Amin Yavari, et al., Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 34, pp. 106–115, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Maskery, N. T. Aboulkhair, A. O. Aremu, et al., Compressive failure modes and energy absorption in additively manufactured double gyroid lattices, Addit. Manuf., vol. 16, pp. 24–29, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Li, W. Liao, N. Dai, and Y. M. Xie, Comparison of mechanical properties and energy absorption of sheet-based and strut-based gyroid cellular structures with graded densities, Materials., vol. 12, no. 13, pp. 2183, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ma12132183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. B. Ostos, R. G. Rinaldi, C. M Hammetter, et al., Deformation stabilization of lattice structures via foam addition, Acta Mater., vol. 60, no. 19, pp. 6476–6485, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Raam Kumar, S. Sridhar, R. Venkatraman, and M. Venkatesan, Polymer additive manufacturing of ASA structure: Influence of printing parameters on mechanical properties, Mater. Today Proc., vol. 39, pp. 1316–1319, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.500.
   Google Scholar
• A. Panesar, M. Abdi, D. Hickman, and I. Ashcroft, Strategies for functionally graded lattice structures derived using topology optimisation for Additive Manufacturing, Addit. Manuf., vol. 19, pp. 81–94, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-Y. Park, K.-S. Kim, B. AlMangour, et al., Effect of unit cell topology on the tensile loading responses of additive manufactured CoCrMo triply periodic minimal surface sheet lattices, Mater. Des., vol. 206, pp. 109778, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-Y. Park, K.-S. Kim, B. AlMangour, et al., Compressive deformation behavior and energy absorption characteristic of additively manufactured sheet CoCrMo triply periodic minimal surface lattices, J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 18, pp. 171–184, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.086.
   Google Scholar
• D. A. de Aquino, I. Maskery, G. A. Longhitano, et al., Investigation of load direction on the compressive strength of additively manufactured triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 109, no. 3–4, pp. 771–779, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05706-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Doroudiani, and M. T. Kortschot, Polystyrene foams. III. Structure-tensile properties relationships, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1427–1434, 2003. DOI: 10.1002/app.12806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Chen, H. Hao, D. Hughes, et al., Static and dynamic mechanical properties of expanded polystyrene, Mater. Des., vol. 69, pp. 170–180, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Miralbes, D. Ranz, J. Ivens, and J. A. Gomez, Characterization of cork and cork agglomerates under compressive loads by means of energy absorption diagrams, Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 719–731, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00107-020-01625-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Alomar, and F. Concli, A Review of the selective laser melting lattice structures and their numerical models, Adv. Eng. Mater., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2000611, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/adem.202000611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Linul, D. A. Serban, T. Voiconi, et al., Energy - Absorption and efficiency diagrams of rigid PUR foams, KEM., vol. 601, pp. 246–249, 2014. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.601.246.
   Google Scholar
• P. Wei, and L. Liu, Influence of density on compressive properties and energy absorption of foamed aluminum alloy, J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 225–228, 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s11595-005-2225-5.
   Google Scholar
• A. G. Hanssen, M. Langseth, and O. S. Hopperstad, Static and dynamic crushing of square aluminium extrusions with aluminium foam filler, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 347–383, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00169-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Benedetti, J. Klarin, F. Johansson, et al., Study of the compression behaviour of Ti6Al4V trabecular structures produced by additive laser manufacturing, Materials., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1471, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ma12091471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. H. Mirbagheri, and M. Salehi, Complementary and normalized energies during static and dynamic uniaxial deformation of single and multi-layer foam-filled tube, J. Sandw. Struct. Mater., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1470–1490, 2022. DOI: 10.1177/10996362211050914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. C. Rusch, Load–compression behavior of flexible foams, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2297–2311, 1969. DOI: 10.1002/app.1969.070131106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Maskery, and I. A. Ashcroft, The deformation and elastic anisotropy of a new gyroid-based honeycomb made by laser sintering, Addit Manuf., vol. 36, pp. 101548, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar