Anisotropic mechanical behavior prediction of aluminum alloy sheet based on an anisotropic GTN model: Modeling, simulation and experimental investigation

References

• J. Zhu, S. Huang, W. Liu, J. Hu, and X. Zou, Calibration of anisotropic yield function by introducing plane strain test instead of equi-biaxial tensile test, Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. China, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2307–2313, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(18)64875-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Chen, J. Zhao, and G. Fang, Finite element modeling for deep-drawing of aluminum alloy sheet 6014-T4 using anisotropic yield and non-AFR models, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 104, no. 1–4, pp. 535–549, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03921-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JiapingLi, et al., Corrosion resistance and forming mechanism of the lauric acid/graphene composite films on aluminum alloy by electrodeposition, Adv. Eng. Mater., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2001540, 2021. DOI: 10.1002/adem.202001540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Cao, F. Li, X. Ma, and Z. Sun, Study of anisotropic crack growth behavior for aluminum alloy 7050-T7451, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 196, pp. 98–112, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Lee, H. Park, S.-J. Kim, Y.-N. Kwon, and D. Kim, Numerical investigation into plastic deformation and failure in aluminum alloy sheet rubber-diaphragm forming, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 142–143, pp. 112–120, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.04.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Tancogne-Dejean, M.B. Gorji, K. Pack, and C.C. Roth, The third Sandia Fracture Challenge: deterministic and probabilistic modeling of ductile fracture of additively-manufactured material, Int. J. Fract., vol. 218, no. 1–2, pp. 209–229, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-019-00355-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Quach, and Y.S. Kim, Effect of non-associated flow rule on fracture prediction of metal sheets using a novel anisotropic ductile fracture criterion, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 195, pp. 106224, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Carpinteri, M. Corrado, B. Gong, and P. Perdonò, Experimental evidence and numerical simulation of size effects on the ductile fracture of metallic materials, Int. J. Fract., vol. 211, no. 1–2, pp. 43–59, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-018-0275-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Shang, Z. Cui, and M. Fu, A ductile fracture model considering stress state and Zener–Hollomon parameter for hot deformation of metallic materials, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 144, pp. 800–812, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Thuillier, E. Maire, and M. Brunet, Ductile damage in aluminium alloy thin sheets: Correlation between micro-tomography observations and mechanical modeling, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 558, pp. 217–225, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.07.116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.L. Gurson, Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part I—Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 2–15, 1977. DOI: 10.1115/1.3443401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Tvergaard, Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions, Int. J. Fract., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 389–407, 1981. DOI: 10.1007/BF00036191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Tvergaard, On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids, Int. J. Fract., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 237–252, 1982. DOI: 10.1007/BF00015686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Tvergaard, and A. Needleman, Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar, Acta Metall., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 157–169, 1984. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Chen, Z. Sun, and B. Panicaud, Investigation of ductile damage during surface mechanical attrition treatment for TWIP steels using a dislocation density based viscoplasticity and damage models, Mech. Mater., vol. 129, pp. 279–289, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Djouabi, A. Ati, and P.-Y. Manach, Identification strategy influence of elastoplastic behavior law parameters on Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman damage parameters: Application to DP980 steel, Int. J. Damage Mech., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 427–454, 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1056789518772130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Reddi, V. Areej, and S. Keralavarma, Ductile failure simulations using a multi-surface coupled damage-plasticity model, Int. J. Plast., vol. 118, pp. 190–214, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. He, H. Zhu, and Y. Hu, An improved shear modified GTN model for ductile fracture of aluminium alloys under different stress states and its parameters identification, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 192, pp. 106081, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.B. Bettaieb, X. Lemoine, L. Duchêne, and A.M. Habraken, On the numerical integration of an advanced Gurson model, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 1049–1072, 2011. DOI: 10.1002/nme.3010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Xu, J. Lin, Z. Shengdun, and H. Zhang, Research of the Gurson damage model of the different yield functions during the deep-drawing process, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 91, no. 5–8, pp. 1643–1659, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-9873-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Shahzamanian, Anisotropic Gurson‐Tvergaard‐Needleman plasticity and damage model for finite element analysis of elastic‐plastic problems, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 115, no. 13, pp. 1527–1551, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/nme.5906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Morin, M. Fourmeau, T. Børvik, A. Benallal, and O.S. Hopperstad, Anisotropic tensile failure of metals by the strain localization theory: An application to a high-strength aluminium alloy, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, vol. 69, pp. 99–112, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2017.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, Effect of the solving method of parameters on the description ability of the yield criterion about the anisotropic behavior, JME., vol. 49, no. 24, pp. 45–53, 2013. DOI: 10.3901/JME.2013.24.045.
   Google Scholar
• H. Aguir, and H. Marouani, Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman parameters identification using artificial neural networks in sheet metal blanking, Int. J. Mater. Form., vol. 3, no. S1, pp. 113–116, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s12289-010-0720-5.
   Google Scholar
• M. Rakin, Z. Cvijovic, V. Grabulov, S. Putic, and A. Sedmak, Prediction of ductile fracture initiation using micromechanical analysis, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 71, no. 4–6, pp. 813–827, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00013-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Tu, S. Schmauder, and U. Weber, Numerical study of electron beam welded butt joints with the GTN model, Comput. Mech., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 245–255, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00466-012-0739-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Yildiz, and S. Yilmaz, Experimental Investigation of GTN model parameters of 6061 Al alloy, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, vol. 83, pp. 104040, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.104040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.-S. Cao, et al., Characterization of ductile damage for a high carbon steel using 3D X-ray micro-tomography and mechanical tests–Application to the identification of a shear modified GTN model, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 84, pp. 175–187, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Prahl, S. Bourgeois, T. Pandorf, M. Aboutayeb, O. Debordes, and D. Weichert, Damage parameter identification by a periodic homogenization approach, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 25, no. 1–2, pp. 159–165, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0927-0256(02)00260-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Steglich, A. Pirondi, N. Bonora, and W. Brocks, Micromechanical modelling of cyclic plasticity incorporating damage, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 337–351, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.06.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Abbasi, M. Ketabchi, H. Izadkhah, D. Fatmehsaria, and A. Aghbash, Identification of GTN model parameters by application of response surface methodology, Procedia Eng., vol. 10, pp. 415–420, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.070.
   Google Scholar
• M. Abbasi, B. Bagheri, M. Ketabchi, and D. Haghshenas, Application of response surface methodology to drive GTN model parameters and determine the FLD of tailor welded blank, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 368–376, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Rahimidehgolan, G. Majzoobi, F. Alinejad, and J.F. Sola, Determination of the constants of GTN damage model using experiment, polynomial regression and Kriging methods, Applied Sciences., vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1179, 2017. DOI: 10.3390/app7111179.
   Google Scholar
• Q. Sun, Y. Lu, and J. Chen, Identification of material parameters of a shear modified GTN damage model by small punch test, Int. J. Fract., vol. 222, no. 1–2, pp. 25–35, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-020-00428-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.D. Shikalgar, B. Dutta, and J. Chattopadhyay, Analysis of p-SPT specimens using Gurson parameters ascertained by Artificial Neural Network, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 240, pp. 107324, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Park, and K. Chung, Non-associated flow rule with symmetric stiffness modulus for isotropic-kinematic hardening and its application for earing in circular cup drawing, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 49, no. 25, pp. 3582–3593, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, Y. Yan, M. Wan, and X. Wu, Experimental investigation and constitutive modeling for the hardening behavior of 5754O aluminum alloy sheet under two-stage loading, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 49, no. 26, pp. 3693–3710, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.W. Swift, Plastic instability under plane stress, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 1952. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Aravas, On the numerical integration of a class of pressure‐dependent plasticity models, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1395–1416, 1987. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620240713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Zhang, Explicit consistent tangent moduli with a return mapping algorithm for pressure-dependent elastoplasticity models, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 121, no. 1–4, pp. 29–44, 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(94)00707-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Chen, and X. Dong, The GTN damage model based on Hill’48 anisotropic yield criterion and its application in sheet metal forming, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 1013–1021, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.07.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standard ISO 6892-1. Metallic materials - Tensile Testing. Part 1: Method of Test at Room Temperature. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• G. Charca Ramos, M. Stout, R.E. Bolmaro, J.W. Signorelli, and P. Turner, Study of a drawing-quality sheet steel. I: Stress/strain behaviors and Lankford coefficients by experiments and micromechanical simulations, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 47, no. 17, pp. 2285–2293, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.04.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.H. Nguyen, T.N. Nguyen, and H.C. Vu, Ductile fracture prediction and forming assessment of AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy sheets, Int. J. Fract., vol. 209, no. 1–2, pp. 143–162, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-017-0249-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Xiao, and Y. Hu, An extended iterative identification method for the GISSMO model, Metals, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 568, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/met9050568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Xue, M. Pontin, F. Zok, and J.W. Hutchinson, Calibration procedures for a computational model of ductile fracture, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 492–509, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Sun, Research on the Damage and Fracture Behavior of Steel Strip during Rolling Process. Shanghai, China: East China University of Science and Technology, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• A. Kami, B.M. Dariani, A.S. Vanini, D.S. Comsa, and D. Banabic, Numerical determination of the forming limit curves of anisotropic sheet metals using GTN damage model, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 216, pp. 472–483, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Chalal and F. Abed-Meraim, Determination of forming limit diagrams based on ductile damage models and necking criteria, Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1872–1892, 2017. DOI: 10.1590/1679-78253481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Jiang, Y.M. Hu, J. Xiao, X. Jin, and W. Luo, Meso mechanical characterization of stamping damage evolution and ductile fracture of aluminum alloy 6016, J. Plast. Eng., vol. 26, pp. 133–140, 2019. (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• B. Teng, W. Wang, and Y. Xu, Ductile fracture prediction in aluminium alloy 5A06 sheet forming based on GTN damage model, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 186, pp. 242–254, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Feng, et al., Application of a GTN damage model predicting the fracture of 5052-O aluminum alloy high-speed electromagnetic impaction, Metals, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 761, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/met8100761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ko, J. Park, and J.W. Jeong, Energy saving potential of a model-predicted frost prevention method for energy recovery ventilators, Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 185, pp. 116450, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Javed, A.A. Baig, K. Djidjeli, A. Shahzad, and A. Hameed, Upwind skewed radial basis functions (USRBF) for solution of highly convective problems over meshfree nodes, Eng. Comput., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1081–1097, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00366-019-00873-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.Y. Zou, S.Q. Yin, and W.T. Wang, Spatial interpolation of the extreme hourly precipitation at different return levels in the Haihe River basin, J. Hydrol., vol. 598, pp. 126273, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Li, W. Quan, B. Han, Z. Wang, and J. Fang, Design and optimization of multilayer cylindrical magnetic shield for SERF Atomic Magnetometer Application, IEEE Sensors J., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1793–1800, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2950420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kamikawa, and H. Morino, Quantitative analysis of load–displacement curves in Erichsen Cupping test for low carbon steel sheet, Metall. Mater. Trans A., vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 5023–5037, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-019-05418-3.
   Google Scholar
• International Standard ISO 20482. Metallic materials - Sheet and strip -Erichsen Cupping Test, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• S. Sunil, and K.B. Pai, Investigation of formability of CRCA steel sheet by Erichsen Cupping Test analysis, IOSRJMCE., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 52–55, 2014. DOI: 10.9790/1684-11215255.
   Google Scholar
• A. Kocańda, and C. Jasiński, Extended evaluation of Erichsen cupping test results by means of laser speckle, Arch. Civil Mech. Eng., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 211–216, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2015.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar