A phase field approach to fracture for hyperelastic and visco-hyperelastic materials applied to pre-stressed cylindrical structures

References

• Y. Abou Msallem, F. Jacquemin, N. Boyard, A. Poitou, D. Delaunay, and S. Chatel, Material characterization and residual stresses simulation during the manufacturing process of epoxy matrix composites, Compos. A: Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 108–115, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.A. Holzapfel and R.W. Ogden, Modelling the layer-specific three-dimensional residual stresses in arteries, with an application to the human aorta, J. R. Soc. Interface, vol. 7, no. 46, pp. 787–799, 2010. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.-K. Jha, J. Reinoso, H. Dehghani, and J. Merodio, A computational model for fiber-reinforced composites: Hyperelastic constitutive formulation including residual stresses and damage, Comput Mech., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 931–948, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00466-018-1630-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D. Humphrey, Vascular adaptation and mechanical homeostasis at tissue, cellular, and sub-cellular levels, Cell Biochem. Biophys., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 53–78, 2008. 10.1007/s12013-007-9002-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Alhayani, J. Giraldo, J. Rodríguez, and J. Merodio, Computational modelling of bulging of inflated cylindrical shells applicable to aneurysm formation and propagation in arterial wall tissue, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., vol. 73, pp. 20–29, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2013.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Alhayani, J. Rodríguez, and J. Merodio, Competition between radial expansion and axial propagation in bulging of inflated cylinders with application to aneurysms propagation in arterial wall tissue, Int. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 85, pp. 74–89, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2014.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Demirkoparan and J. Merodio, Bulging bifurcation of inflated circular cylinders of doubly fiber-reinforced hyperelastic material under axial loading and swelling, Math. Mech. Solids, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 666–682, 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1081286515600045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Merodio and D. Haughton, Bifurcation of thick-walled cylindrical shells and the mechanical response of arterial tissue affected by marfan’s syndrome, Mech. Res. Commun., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2009.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Jha, J. Merodio, and J. Reinoso, A general non-local constitutive relation for residually stressed solids, Mech. Res. Commun., vol. 101, p. 103421, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2019.103421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Linder, M. Tkachuk, and C. Miehe, A micromechanically motivated diffusion-based transient network model and its incorporation into finite rubber viscoelasticity, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 2134–2156, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Miehe and J. Keck, Superimposed finite elastic–viscoelastic–plastoelastic stress response with damage in filled rubbery polymers. experiments, modelling and algorithmic implementation, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 323–365, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00017-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Simo, On a fully three-dimensional finite-strain viscoelastic damage model: Formulation and computational aspects, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 153–173, 1987. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(87)90107-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Govindjee and J.C. Simo, Mullins’ effect and the strain amplitude dependence of the storage modulus, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 29, no. 14–15, pp. 1737–1751, 1992. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(92)90167-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.A. Holzapfel, On large strain viscoelasticity: Continuum formulation and finite element applications to elastomeric structures, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 39, no. 22, pp. 3903–3926, 1996. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961130)39:22¡3903::AID-NME34¿3.0.CO;2-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kaliske and H. Rothert, Formulation and implementation of three-dimensional viscoelasticity at small and finite strains, Comput. Mech., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 228–239, 1997. DOI: 10.1007/s004660050171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Jha, J. Reinoso, H. Dehghani, and J. Merodio, Constitutive modeling framework for residually stressed viscoelastic solids at finite strains, Mech. Res. Commun., vol. 95, pp. 79–84, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2019.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Bergström and M. Boyce, Constitutive modeling of the large strain time-dependent behavior of elastomers, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 931–954, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00075-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Reese and S. Govindjee, A theory of finite viscoelasticity and numerical aspects, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 35, no. 26–27, pp. 3455–3482, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00217-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Merodio and K.R. Rajagopal, On constitutive equations for anisotropic nonlinearly viscoelastic solids, Math. Mech. Solids, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 131–147, 2007. DOI: 10.1177/1081286505055472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Lopez-Pamies, M.I. Idiart, and T. Nakamura, Cavitation in elastomeric solids: I’a defect-growth theory, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1464–1487, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.G. Knauss, A review of fracture in viscoelastic materials, Int. J. Fract., vol. 196, no. 1–2, pp. 99–146, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-015-0058-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.L. Cooke and D.D. Pollard, Fracture propagation paths under mixed mode loading within rectangular blocks of polymethyl methacrylate, J. Geophys. Res., vol. 101, no. B2, pp. 3387–3400, 1996. DOI: 10.1029/95JB02507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.J. Pons and A. Karma, Helical crack-front instability in mixed-mode fracture, Nature, vol. 464, no. 7285, pp. 85–89, 2010. 10.1038/nature08862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.A. Hocine, M.N. Abdelaziz, and A. Imad, Fracture problems of rubbers: J-integral estimation based upon η factors and an investigation on the strain energy density distribution as a local criterion, Int. J. Fract., vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2002. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020967429222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Schapery, Correspondence principles and a generalizedj integral for large deformation and fracture analysis of viscoelastic media, Int. J. Fract., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 195–223, 1984. DOI: 10.1007/BF01140837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kroon, Steady-state crack growth in rubber-like solids, Int. J. Fract., vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-010-9583-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Geißler, M. Kaliske, M. Nase, and W. Grellmann, Peel process simulation of sealed polymeric film computational modelling of experimental results, Eng. Comput., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 586–607, 2007. DOI: 10.1108/02644400710774798.
   Google Scholar
• I. Zreid, R. Fleischhauer, and M. Kaliske, A thermomechanically coupled viscoelastic cohesive zone model at large deformation, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 50, no. 25–26, pp. 4279–4291, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.08.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.L. Warren, S.A. Silling, A. Askari, O. Weckner, M.A. Epton, and J. Xu, A non-ordinary state-based peridynamic method to model solid material deformation and fracture, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1186–1195, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.10.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Huang, S. Oterkus, H. Hou, E. Oterkus, Z. Wei, and S. Zhang, Peridynamic model for visco-hyperelastic material deformation in different strain rates, Contin. Mech. Thermodyn., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 977–1011, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00161-019-00849-0.
   Google Scholar
• A. Griffith, The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids, Philos. Trans. A, vol. 221, pp. 163–198, 1920. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1921.0006.
   Google Scholar
• G. Francfort and J.-J. Marigo, Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1319–1342, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Bourdin, G.A. Francfort, and J.J. Marigo, Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 797–826, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Miehe, F. Welshinger, and M. Hofacker, Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi-field FE implementations, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., vol. 83, no. 10, pp. 1273–1311, 2010. DOI: 10.1002/nme.2861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Kuhn and R. Müller, A continuum phase field model for fracture, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 77, no. 18, pp. 3625–3634, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-Y. Wu, A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 103, pp. 72–99, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-Y. Wu and V.P. Nguyen, A length scale insensitive phase-field damage model for brittle fracture, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 119, pp. 20–42, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.P. Duda, A. Ciarbonetti, P.J. Sánchez, and A.E. Huespe, A phase-field/gradient damage model for brittle fracture in elastic-plastic solids, Int. J. Plast., vol. 65, pp. 269–296, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Kuhn, T. Noll, and R. Müller, On phase field modeling of ductile fracture, GAMM Mitteilungen., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 35–54, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/gamm.201610003.
   Google Scholar
• M.J. Borden, T.J.R. Hughes, C.M. Landis, A. Anvari, and I.J. Lee, A phase-field formulation for fracture in ductile materials: Finite deformation balance law derivation, plastic degradation, and stress triaxiality effects, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 312, pp. 130–166, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Alessi, M. Ambati, T. Gerasimov, S. Vidoli, and L. De Lorenzis, Comparison of phase-field models of fracture coupled with plasticity. In: M.C.E. Oñate, D. Peric, E. de Souza-Neto (eds.), Advances in Computational Plasticity, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 1–21, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60885-3_1.
   Google Scholar
• A. Dean, J. Reinoso, N. Jha, E. Mahdi, and R. Rolfes, A phase field approach for ductile fracture of short fibre reinforced composites, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., vol. 106, p. 102495, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Yin and M. Kaliske, A ductile phase-field model based on degrading the fracture toughness: Theory and implementation at small strain, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 366, p. 113068, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.S. Shishvan, S. Assadpour-Asl, and E. Martínez-Pañeda, A mechanism-based gradient damage model for metallic fracture, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 255, p. 107927, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Raina and C. Miehe, A phase-field model for fracture in biological tissues, Biomech. Model Mechanobiol., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 479–496, 2016. 10.1007/s10237-015-0702-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Li, C. Peco, D. Millán, I. Arias, and M. Arroyo, Phase-field modeling and simulation of fracture in brittle materials with strongly anisotropic surface energy, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 102, no. 3–4, pp. 711–727, 2015. DOI: 10.1002/nme.4726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Gültekin, H. Dal, and G.A. Holzapfel, A phase-field approach to model fracture of arterial walls: Theory and finite element analysis, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 312, pp. 542–566, 2016. 10.1016/j.cma.2016.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Paggi, M. Corrado, and J. Reinoso, Fracture of solar-grade anisotropic polycrystalline silicon: A combined phase field–cohesive zone model approach, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 330, pp. 123–148, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Gültekin, H. Dal, and G.A. Holzapfel, Numerical aspects of anisotropic failure in soft biological tissues favor energy-based criteria: A rate-dependent anisotropic crack phase-field model, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 331, pp. 23–52, 2018. 10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Storm, D. Supriatna, and M. Kaliske, The concept of representative crack elements for phase-field fracture: Anisotropic elasticity and thermo-elasticity, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 779–805, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/nme.6244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Yin and M. Kaliske, An anisotropic phase-field model based on the equivalent crack surface energy density at finite strain, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 369, p. 113202, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Ren, X. Zhuang, C. Anitescu, and T. Rabczuk, An explicit phase field method for brittle dynamic fracture, Comput. Struct., vol. 217, pp. 45–56, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Steinke, K. Özenç, G. Chinaryan, and M. Kaliske, A comparative study of the r-adaptive material force approach and the phase-field method in dynamic fracture, Int. J. Fract., vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 97–118, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-016-0125-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.K. Kristensen and E. Martínez-Pañeda, Phase field fracture modelling using quasi-Newton methods and a new adaptive step scheme, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., vol. 107, p. 102446, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Paggi and J. Reinoso, Revisiting the problem of a crack impinging on an interface: A modeling framework for the interaction between the phase field approach for brittle fracture and the interface cohesive zone model, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 321, pp. 145–172, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Reinoso, M. Paggi, and C. Linder, Phase field modeling of brittle fracture for enhanced assumed strain shells at large deformations: Formulation and finite element implementation, Comput. Mech., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 981–1001, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00466-017-1386-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Carollo, J. Reinoso, and M. Paggi, A 3D finite strain model for intralayer and interlayer crack simulation coupling the phase field approach and cohesive zone model, Compos. Struct., vol. 182, pp. 636–651, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Carollo, T. Guillén-Hernández, J. Reinoso, and M. Paggi, Recent advancements on the phase field approach to brittle fracture for heterogeneous materials and structures, Adv. Model Simul. Eng. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 8, 2018. 10.1186/s40323-018-0102-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• T. Guillén-Hernández, I. García, J. Reinoso, and M. Paggi, A micromechanical analysis of inter-fiber failure in long reinforced composites based on the phase field approach of fracture combined with the cohesive zone model, Int. J. Fract., vol. 220, no. 2, pp. 181–203, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-019-00384-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Quintanas-Corominas, J. Reinoso, E. Casoni, A. Turon, and J.A. Mayugo, A phase field approach to simulate intralaminar and translaminar fracture in long fiber composite materials, Compos. Struct., vol. 220, pp. 899–911, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Goswami, C. Anitescu, S. Chakraborty, and T. Rabczuk, Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracture, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., vol. 106, p. 102447, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Shen, H. Waisman, and L. Guo, Fracture of viscoelastic solids modeled with a modified phase field method, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 346, pp. 862–890, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.09.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.J. Loew, B. Peters, and L.A. Beex, Rate-dependent phase-field damage modeling of rubber and its experimental parameter identification, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 127, pp. 266–294, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Yin and M. Kaliske, Fracture simulation of viscoelastic polymers by the phase-field method, Comput. Mech., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 293–309, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00466-019-01769-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Song, et al., Coupling of phase field and viscoplasticity for modelling cyclic softening and crack growth under fatigue, Eur. J. Mech. A Solids, vol. 92, p. 104472, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Dammaß, M. Ambati, and M. Kästner, A unified phase-field model of fracture in viscoelastic materials, Contin. Mech. Thermodyn., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1907–1929, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00161-021-01013-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Thamburaja, K. Sarah, A. Srinivasa, and J. Reddy, Fracture of viscoelastic materials: Fem implementation of a non-local & rate form-based finite-deformation constitutive theory, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 354, pp. 871–903, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.05.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Sarah, P. Thamburaja, A. Srinivasa, and J.N. Reddy, Numerical simulations of damage and fracture in viscoelastic solids using a nonlocal fracture criterion, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 27, no. 13, pp. 1085–1097, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2020.1716414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Rodríguez and J. Merodio, Helical buckling and postbuckling of pre-stressed cylindrical tubes under finite torsion, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., vol. 112, pp. 1–10, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2015.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Merodio and R.W. Ogden, Extension, inflation and torsion of a residually-stressed circular cylindrical tube, Contin. Mech. Thermodyn., vol. 28, no. 1–2, pp. 157–174, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00161-015-0411-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Nam, J. Merodio, R. Ogden, and P. Vinh, The effect of initial stress on the propagation of surface waves in a layered half-space, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 88–89, pp. 88–100, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Merodio and R. Ogden, Constitutive Modelling of Solid Continua, Solid Mechanics and its Applications, Springer, Berlin, vol. 262, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31547-4.
   Google Scholar
• H. Dehghani, D. Desena-Galarza, N. Jha, J. Reinoso, and J. Merodio, Bifurcation and post-bifurcation of an inflated and extended residually-stressed circular cylindrical tube with application to aneurysms initiation and propagation in arterial wall tissue, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., vol. 161, pp. 51–60, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2019.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Font, N. Jha, H. Dehghani, J. Reinoso, and J. Merodio, Modelling of residually stressed, extended and inflated cylinders with application to aneurysms, Mech. Res. Commun., vol. 111, p. 103643, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Li, Z. Huang, Z. Suo, S.P. Lacour, and S. Wagner, Stretchability of thin metal films on elastomer substrates, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 85, no. 16, pp. 3435–3437, 2004. DOI: 10.1063/1.1806275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Li, Z. Zhang, and B. Michaux, Competing failure mechanisms of thin metal films on polymer substrates under tension, Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett., vol. 1, no. 4, p. 041002, 2011. DOI: 10.1063/2.1104102.
   Google Scholar
• B. Bourdin, G.A. Francfort, and J.J. Marigo, The Variational Approach to Fracture, Springer, Netherlands, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s10659-007-9107-3.
   Google Scholar
• J. Merodio, R.W. Ogden, and J. Rodrguez, The influence of residual stress on finite deformation elastic response, Int. J. Non. Linear Mech., vol. 56, pp. 43–49, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2013.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Balzani, J. Schröder, and D. Gross, Numerical simulation of residual stresses in arterial walls, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 117–123, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Borden, C.V. Verhoosel, M.A. Scott, T.J.R. Hughes, and C.M. Landis, A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 217–220, pp. 77–95, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2012.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Amor, J.J. Marigo, and C. Maurini, Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: Numerical experiments, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1209–1229, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Ostwald, E. Kuhl, and A. Menzel, On the implementation of finite deformation gradient-enhanced damage models, Comput. Mech., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 847–877, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00466-019-01684-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Navidtehrani, C. Betegón, and E. Martínez-Pañeda, A unified abaqus implementation of the phase field fracture method using only a user material subroutine, Materials, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 1913, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ma14081913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Navidtehrani, C. Betegón, and E. Martínez-Pañeda, A simple and robust abaqus implementation of the phase field fracture method, Appl. Eng. Sci., vol. 6, p. 100050, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.apples.2021.100050.
   Google Scholar
• C. Hortig, Local and non-local thermomechanical modeling and finite-element simulation of high-speed cutting, Ph.D. thesis, 2010. DOI: 10.17877/DE290R-15992.
   Google Scholar
• C. Miehe and L.-M. Schänzel, Phase field modeling of fracture in rubbery polymers. Part I: Finite elasticity coupled with brittle failure, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 65, pp. 93–113, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hansen-Dörr, Phase field modelling and simulation of interface failure, Ph.D. thesis, 2017. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33904.35847.
   Google Scholar
• D. Desena-Galarza, H. Dehghani, N. Jha, J. Reinoso, and J. Merodio, Computational bifurcation analysis for hyperelastic residually stressed tubes under combined inflation and extension and aneurysms in arterial tissue, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., vol. 197, p. 103636, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2021.103636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar