Effect of personalized liner thickness on the stresses at the stump-prosthesis interface

References

• K. Ziegler-Graham, E.J. MacKenzie, P.L. Ephraim, T.G. Travison and R. Brookmeyer, Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 422–429, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. Radcliffe, Functional Considerations in the Fitting of above-Knee Prostheses. Biomechanics Laboratory, University of California, 1955, 2(1), pp.35–60, PMID: 14351063.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Cagle, P.G. Reinhall, K.J. Allyn, J. McLean, P. Hinrichs, B.J. Hafner and J. E. Sanders, A finite element model to assess transtibial prosthetic sockets with elastomeric liners, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1227–1240, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1758-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Lacroix, and J. F. R. Patiño, Finite element analysis of donning procedure of a prosthetic transfemoral socket, Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2972–2983, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0389-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Meng, D. W. C. Wong, M. Zhang, and A. K. L. Leung, Analysis of compression/release stabilized transfemoral prosthetic socket by finite element modeling method, Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 83, pp. 123–129, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.05.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. P. Chillale, N. H. Kim, and L. N. Smith, Mechanical and finite element analysis of an innovative orthopedic implant designed to increase the weight carrying ability of the femur and reduce frictional forces on an amputee’s stump, Mil. Med., vol. 184, no. Suppl 1, pp. 627–636, 2019. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usy382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ismail Boudjemaa, A. Sahli, A. Benkhettou, and S. Benbarek, Preliminary results on the effects of orthopedic implant stiffness fixed to the cut end of the femur on the stress at the stump-prosthetic interface, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale., vol. 15, no. 57, pp. 160–168, 2021. DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.57.13.
   Google Scholar
• L. Lostado, Comparative analysis of healthy and Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) human hip joints using the finite element method, Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 11101, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/app112311101.
   Google Scholar
• F. Somovilla-Gómez, M. Corral-Bobadilla and R. Escribano-García, Improvement in determining the risk of damage to the human lumbar functional spinal unit considering age, height, weight and sex using a combination of FEM and RSM, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 351–387, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-019-01215-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. McCartney, B. MacDonald, C.A. Ober, R. Lostado-Lorza and F.S. Gómez, Pelvic modelling and the comparison between plate position for double pelvic osteotomy using artificial cancellous bone and finite element analysis, BMC Vet Res., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1416-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S. Íñiguez-Macedo, F. Somovilla-Gómez, R. Lostado-Lorza, M. Corral-Bobadilla, M.Á. Martínez-Calvo and F. Sanz-Adán, The design of a knee prosthesis by finite element analysis, in Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing. Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 447–455. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_45.
   Google Scholar
• R.L. Lorza, F.S. Gomez, R.F. Martinez, R.E. Garcia and M.C. Bobadilla, Improvement in the process of designing a new artificial human intervertebral lumbar disc combining soft computing techniques and the finite element method, in International Joint Conference SOCO’16-CISIS’16-ICEUTE’16. Cham: Springer, 2016, pp. 223–232. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47364-2_22.
   Google Scholar
• F. Somovilla Gomez, R. Lostado Lorza, R. Fernandez Martinez, M. Corral Bobadilla, and R. Escribano Garcia. A proposed methodology for setting the finite element models based on healthy human intervertebral lumbar discs, in International Conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems. Cham: Springer, 2016, pp. 621–633. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32034-2_52.
   Google Scholar
• F. Somovilla-Gómez, S. Iñiguez-Macedo, E. Jiménez-Ruiz, L. Muro-Fraguas, G. Gañán-Catalina, Á. Leciñana-Soldevilla, M. Corral-Bobadilla, C. Díaz-Bertrana-Sánchez and R. Lostado-Lorza, 3D-printed canine tibia model from clinical computed tomography data, in International Conference on the Digital Transformation in the Graphic Engineering. Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 254–262. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-41200-5_28.
   Google Scholar
• I. Hoogendoorn, J. Reenalda, B. F. Koopman, and J. S. Rietman, The effect of pressure and shear on tissue viability of human skin in relation to the development of pressure ulcers: a systematic review, J Tissue Viability., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 157–171, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2017.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. W. Steer, P. R. Worsley, M. Browne, and A. S. Dickinson, Predictive prosthetic socket design: Part 1—Population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1331–1346, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-019-01195-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. M. Mbithi, A. J. Chipperfield, J. W. Steer, and A. S. Dickinson, Predictive control for an active prosthetic socket informed by FEA-based tissue damage risk estimation, Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., vol. 2019, pp. 2073–2076, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R. S. Kistenberg, S. A. Kondor, S. Tawfik, and M. Terk, Medical Imaging Generated Dynamic Prosthetic Sockets. Georgia Institute of Technology, 2011, smartech.gatech.edu
   Google Scholar
• W. C. Lee, M. Zhang, X. Jia, and J. T. Cheung, Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket, Med. Eng. Phys.., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 655–662, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.04.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Jia, M. Zhang, and W. C. Lee, Load transfer mechanics between trans-tibial prosthetic socket and residual limb—Dynamic effects, J. Biomech., vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1371–1377, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Portnoy, Z. Yizhar, N. Shabshin, Y. Itzchak, A. Kristal, Y. Dotan-Marom, I. Siev-Ner and A. Gefen, Internal mechanical conditions in the soft tissues of a residual limb of a trans-tibial amputee, J. Biomech., vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1897–1909, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. L. Wu, C.-H. Chang, A.-T. Hsu, C.-C. Lin, S.-I. Chen and G.-L. Chang, A proposal for the pre‐evaluation protocol of below‐knee socket design-integration pain tolerance with finite element analysis, J. Chin. Instit. Eng., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 853–860, 2003. DOI: 10.1080/02533839.2003.9670840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. L. Ju, H. Jmal, R. Dupuis, and E. Aubry, A comparison among polynomial model, reduced polynomial model and Ogden model for polyurethane foam. AMR., vol. 856, pp. 169–173, 2013. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.856.169.
   Google Scholar
• A. F. A. Karim, H. Ismail, and Z. M. Ariff, Effects of Kenaf loading and alkaline treatment on properties of Kenaf filled natural rubber latex foam, JSM., vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2163–2169, 2018. DOI: 10.17576/jsm-2018-4709-26.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ballit, I. Mougharbel, H. Ghaziri, and T. T. Dao, Fast soft tissue deformation and stump-socket interaction toward a computer-aided design system for lower limb prostheses, Irbm., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 276–285, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2020.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. S. Dickinson, J. W. Steer, and P. R. Worsley, Finite element analysis of the amputated lower limb: A systematic review and recommendations, Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 43, pp. 1–18, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.02.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. R. M. Aliha, H. Ghazi, and F. Ataei, Experimental fracture resistance study for cracked bovine femur bone samples, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale., vol. 13, no. 50, pp. 602–612, 2019. DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.51.
   Google Scholar
• C. C. Lin, C. H. Chang, C. L. Wu, K. C. Chung, and I. C. Liao, Effects of liner stiffness for trans-tibial prosthesis: A finite element contact model, Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00127-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. M. El Sallah, B. Smail, S. Abderahmane, B. B. Bouiadjra and S. Boualem, Numerical simulation of the femur fracture under static loading, Struct. Eng. Mech., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 405–412, 2016. DOI: 10.12989/sem.2016.60.3.405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Gasmi, S. Abderrahmene, B. Smail, and A. Benaoumeur, Initiation and propagation of a crack in the orthopedic cement of a THR using XFEM, Adv. Comput. Des., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 295–305, 2019. DOI: 10.12989/acd.2019.4.3.295.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ramos, and J. A. Simoes, Tetrahedral versus hexahedra finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur, Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 916–924, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar