Multi-objective parametric optimization of driver-based electromagnetic sheet metal forming of SS304 using AA6061-T6 driver

References

• M. Kleiner, C. Beerwald, and W. Homberg, Analysis of process parameters and forming mechanisms within the electromagnetic forming process, CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 225–228, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60089-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Psyk, D. Risch, B.L. Kinsey, A.E. Tekkaya, and M. Kleiner, Electromagnetic forming – a review, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 211, no. 5, pp. 787–829, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.T. Nasri, F. Abbassi, F. Ahmad, W. Makhloufi, M. Ayadi, H. Mehboob, and H.S. Choi, Experimental and numerical investigation of sheet metal failure based on Johnson-Cook model and Erichsen test over a wide range of temperatures, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 2087–2100, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2022.2049934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Selvam and S.S. Karibeeran, Optimisation of process parameters for electromagnetic forming of AA6101 tubes, ASME 2020 15th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, MSEC 2020, vol. 2. September 3, 2020. DOI: 10.1115/MSEC2020-8354.
   Google Scholar
• L. Qiu, Y. Yu, Q. Xiong, C. Deng, Q. Cao, X. Han, and L. Li, Analysis of electromagnetic force and deformation behavior in electromagnetic tube expansion with concave coil based on finite element method, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1–5, Art no. 0600705. 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2017.2789287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Zhang, Q. Cao, X. Han, Q, Chen, Z. Lai, Q. Xiong, F. Deng, and L. Li, Application of triple-coil system for improving deformation depth of tube in electromagnetic forming, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1–4, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2016.2542482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.G. Mamalis, D.E. Manolakos, A.G. Kladas, and A.K. Koumoutsos, Electromagnetic forming tools and processing conditions: numerical simulation, Mater. Manuf. Process., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 411–423, 2006. DOI: 10.1080/10426910500411785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Soni, M. Ahmed, S.K. Panthi, and S. Kumar, Effect of coil design parameters on performance of electromagnetic forming process, Mater. Manuf. Process., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 64–80, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2021.1945091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.L. Kuo, J.S. You, and S.F. Hwang, Initial experiment for embossing a 3-D microstructure on the inside wall of a wound tube by an electromagnetic compression process, J. Chinese Inst. Eng. Trans. Chinese Inst. Eng. A, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1025–1033, 2011. DOI: 10.1080/02533839.2011.618243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.R. Alves Z and F. Bay, Magnetic pulse forming: simulation and experiments for high-speed forming processes, Adv. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 1, no. 3–4, pp. 560–576, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/2374068X.2015.1132723.
   Google Scholar
• A. Shrivastava, A. Telang, A.K. Jha, and M. Ahmed, Experimental and numerical study on the influence of process parameters in electromagnetic compression of AA6061 tube, Mater. Manuf. Process., vol. 34, no. 13, pp. 1537–1548, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1655156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Lai, Q. Cao, B. Zhang, X. Han, Z. Zhou, Q. Xiong, X. Zhang, Q. Chen, and L. Li, Radial Lorentz force augmented deep drawing for large drawing ratio using a novel dual-coil electromagnetic forming system, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 222, pp. 13–20, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.02.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Xiong, H. Tang, C. Deng, L. Li, and L. Qiu, Electromagnetic attraction-based bulge forming in small tubes: fundamentals and simulations, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1–5, Art no. 0600505, 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2017.2785778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Seth, V.J. Vohnout, and G.S. Daehn, Formability of steel sheet in high velocity impact, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 390–400, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.08.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Park, D. Kim, J. Lee, J.H. Kim, M.-G. Lee, Y. Lee, and J.H. Song, Experimental study on electromagnetic forming of high strength steel sheets with different dimensions of aluminum driver plate, 6th International Conference on High Speed Forming (ICHSF), no. 10040078, pp. 237–242, 2014. DOI: 10.17877/DE290R-15600.
   Google Scholar
• F. Li, J. Mo, J. Li, H. Zhou, and L. Huang, Study on the driver plate for electromagnetic forming of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 69, no. 1–4, pp. 127–137, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-013-5002-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Li, J. Mo, H. Zhou, and Y. Fang, 3D numerical simulation method of electromagnetic forming for low conductive metals with a driver, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 64, no. 9–12, pp. 1575–1585, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4124-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Deng, S. Qin, and J. Huang, Multiobjective optimization of axially varying thickness lateral corrugated tubes for energy absorption, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 29, no. 25, pp. 4259–4272, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1924901.
   Google Scholar
• H. Savadkoohian, A. Fallahi Arezoodar, and B. Arezoo, Analytical and experimental study of wrinkling in electromagnetic tube compression, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 93, no. 1–4, pp. 901–914, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0571-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Khan, M. Khan, S.H. Imran Jaffery, M. Younas, K.S. Afaq, and M.A. Khan, Numerical and experimental investigation of the effect of process parameters on sheet deformation during the electromagnetic forming of AA6061-T6 alloy, Mech. Sci., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 329–347, 2020. DOI: 10.5194/ms-11-329-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kumar, S.D. Kore, and A. Nandy, Experimental investigation of Cu-SS electromagnetically assisted adhesive tube-to-tube joining: its advantages over electromagnetic crimping, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., vol. 109, pp. 102908, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ayaz, M. Khandaei, and Y. Vahidshad, Optimizing the mechanical properties of Al-SS joint using the numerical and experimental investigation of electromagnetic welding, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., vol. 35, no. 20, pp. 2202–2229, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2021.1882765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ayaz, M. Khandaei, and Y. Vahidshad, Evaluating the electromagnetic welding parameters for improving the mechanical properties of Al–Cu joint, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 9619–9637, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s13369-020-04868-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Senthilnathan, G. Venkatachalam, and N.N. Satonkar, A two stage finite element analysis of electromagnetic forming of perforated aluminium sheet metals, Procedia Eng., vol. 97, pp. 1135–1144, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.392.
   Google Scholar
• M. Shabanpour and A. Fallahi Arezoodar, Multi-objective optimization of the depth of bead and tearing in electromagnetic tube compression forming, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 87, no. 1–4, pp. 867–875, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-8519-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P.M. Correia and S. Ahzi, Electromagnetic sheet bulging: analysis of process parameters by FE simulations, Key Eng. Mater., vol. 554–557, pp. 741–748, 2013. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.741.
   Google Scholar
• L. Huang, W. Feng, J. Zeng, and Z. Ding, Research on the drive electromagnetic forming of aluminum alloy and parameter optimization, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 120, no. 11–12, pp. 7101–7113, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-09214-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Paese, M. Geier, R.P. Homrich, R. Rossi, and P.A.R.C. Rosa, Assessment of process parameters in the optimization of the metal sheet electromagnetic forming process, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1–6, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2022.3165482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Krishnaiah and P. Shahabudeen, Applied Design of Experiments and Taguchi Methods. PHI Learning Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• F. Shah, M. Younas, M. Khan, A. Khan, Z. Khan, and N. Khan, Mechanical properties and weld characteristics of friction stir welding of thermoplastics using heat-assisted tool, Weld. World, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 309–323, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s40194-022-01385-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H.I Jaffery, M. Younas, M. Khan and L. Ali, Energy consumption analysis in turning Ti-6Al-4V alloy, 2020 IEEE 11th International Conference on Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies (ICMIMT), 20-22 Jan. 2020, pp. 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Khan, M. Khan, S.-J. Yook, A. Khan, M. Younas, M.Z. Zahir, and M. Asad, Dynamic analysis of closed die electromagnetic sheet metal forming to predict deformation and failure of AA6061-T6 alloy using a fully coupled finite element model, Materials, vol. 15, no. 22, pp. 7997, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/ma15227997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Khan, M. Khan, S.H.I. Jaffery, M. Younas, and A. Khan, Numerical and experimental investigation of fully-coupled and uncoupled finite element model for electromagnetic forming of Aluminium Alloy Al 3014, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 999, no. 1, pp. 012008, 2020. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/999/1/012008.
   Google Scholar
• X. Cui, J. Mo, and J. Li, Research on homogeneous deformation of electromagnetic incremental tube bulging, 6th Int. Conf. High Speed Form., pp. 293–301, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• E. Cadoni, L. Fenu, and D. Forni, Strain rate behaviour in tension of austenitic stainless steel used for reinforcing bars, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 35, pp. 399–407, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Cui, J. Li, J. Mo, J. Fang, B. Zhou, and X. Xiao, Effect of the sheet thickness and current damping exponent on the optimum current frequency in electromagnetic forming, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 85, no. 1–4, pp. 843–851, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7983-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Younas, S.H.I. Jaffery, M. Khan, M.A. Khan, R. Ahmad, A. Mubashar, and L. Ali, Multi-objective optimization for sustainable turning Ti6Al4V alloy using grey relational analysis (GRA) based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 105, no. 1–4, pp. 1175–1188, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-04299-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Bigdeli, and M. Damghani Nouri, Experimental and numerical analysis and multi-objective optimization of quasi-static compressive test on thin-walled cylindrical with internal networking, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 26, no. 19, pp. 1644–1660, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2018.1444231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gao, Y. Feng, and L. Wang, An improved grey relation analysis method and its application in dynamic description for a polymer injection, Pet. Sci. Technol., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 2014. DOI: 10.1080/10916466.2010.490806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.O. Samuel, M. Sumaila, and B. Dan-Asabe, Multi-objective optimization and modeling of a natural fiber hybrid reinforced composite (PxGyEz) for wind turbine blade development using grey relational analysis and regression analysis, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., pp. 1–19, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2022.2118404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar