Tensile behavior of functionally graded sandwich PLA-ABS produced via fused filament fabrication process

References

• X. Yu, J. Zhou, H. Liang, Z. Jiang, and L. Wu, Mechanical metamaterials associated with stiffness, rigidity and compressibility: A brief review, Prog. Mater. Sci., vol. 94, pp. 114–173, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Schaedler, A. Jacobsen, A. Torrents, A. Sorensen, J. Lian, J. Greer, L. Valdevit and W.B. Carter, Ultralight metallic microlattices, Science, vol. 334, no. 6058, pp. 962–965, 2011. DOI: 10.1126/science.1211649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Zheng, H. Lee, T.H. Weisgraber, M. Shusteff, J. DeOtte, E.B. Duoss, J.D. Kuntz, W.M. Biener, Q. Ge, J.A. Jackson, S.Q. Kucheyev, N.X. Fang and C.M. Spadaccini, Ultralight, ultrastiffmechanical metamaterials, Science, vol. 344, no. 6190, pp. 1373–1377, 2014. DOI: 10.1126/science.1252291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.R. Meza, S. Das, and J.R. Greer, Strong, lightweight, and recoverable three-dimensional ceramic nanolattices, Science, vol. 345, no. 6202, pp. 1322–1326, 2014. DOI: 10.1126/science.1255908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Bauer, A. Schroer, R. Schwaiger, and O. Kraft, Approaching theoretical strength in glassy carbon nanolattices, Nat. Mater., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 438–443, 2016. DOI: 10.1038/nmat4561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.N. Grima, R. Gatt, and P.S. Farrugia, On the properties of auxetic meta-tetrachiral structures, Phys. Stat. Sol. (B), vol. 245, no. 3, pp. 511–520, 2008. DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200777704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Silverberg, A.A. Evans, L. McLeod, R.C. Hayward, T. Hull, C.D. Santangelo and I. Cohen, Using origami design principles to fold reprogrammable mechanical metamaterials, Science, vol. 345, no. 6197, pp. 647–650, 2014. DOI: 10.1126/science.1252876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Xu, J. Shen, S. Zhou, X. Huang, and Y. Xie, Design of lattice structures with controlled anisotropy, Mater. Des., vol. 93, pp. 443–447, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Frenzel, M. Kadic, and M. Wegener, Three-dimensional mechanical metamaterials with a twist, Science, vol. 358, no. 6366, pp. 1072–1074, 2017. DOI: 10.1126/science.aao4640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Mahamood, E.T. Akinlabi, M. Shukla and S. Pityana, Functionally Graded Material: An overview, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, vol. III, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• S. Nohut and M. Schwentenwein, Vat photopolymerization additive manufacturing of functionally graded materials: A review, JMMP, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 17, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/jmmp6010017.
   Google Scholar
• T.D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K.T.Q. Nguyen, and D. Hui, Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges, Compos. B: Eng., vol. 143, pp. 172–196, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Van der Elst and A. Williams, Industry 4.0: The new production paradigm and its implications for EU policy, The Global Foresight Group: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• A. Sartal, R. Bellas, A.M. Mejías and A. García-Collado, The sustainable manufacturing concept, evolution and opportunities within Industry 4.0: A literature review, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 12, no. 5, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• B. Saleh, J. Jiang, R. Fathi, T. Al-hababi, Q. Xu, L. Wang, D. Song and A. Ma, 30 Years of functionally graded materials: An overview of manufacturing methods, applications, and future challenges, Compos. B Eng., vol. 201, pp. 108376, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Al Rashid, W. Ahmed, M.Y. Khalid, and M. Koç, Vat photopolymerization of polymers and polymer composites: Processes and applications, Addit. Manuf., vol. 47, pp. 102279, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Anand Kumar and Y. Shivraj Narayan, Tensile Testing and Evaluation of 3D-Printed PLA Specimens as per ASTM D638 Type IV Standard, Innovative Design, Analysis and Development Practices in Aerospace and Automotive Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 79–95, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• T. Salem, P. Jiao, I. Zaabar, X. Li, R. Zhu, and N. Lajnef, Functionally graded materials beams subjected to bilateral constraints: Structural instability and material topology, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 194, pp. 106218, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Durga Prasada Rao, P. Rajiv, and V.N. Geethikak, Effect of fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameters on tensile strength of carbon fibre PLA, Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 18, pp. 2012–2018, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• D. Yadav, D. Chhabra, R.K. Gupta, A. Phogat, and A. Ahlawat, Modeling and analysis of significant process parameters of FDM 3D printer using ANFIS, Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1592–1604, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.227.
   Google Scholar
• H. Vardhan, R. Kumar, and J.S. Chohan, Investigation of tensile properties of sprayed aluminium based PLA composites fabricated by FDM technology, Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 33, pp. 1599–1604, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.335.
   Google Scholar
• C. Vălean, L. Marșavina, M. Mărghitaș, E. Linul, J. Razavi, and F. Berto, Effect of manufacturing parameters on tensile properties of FDM printed specimens, Proc. Struct. Integr., vol. 26, pp. 313–320, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2020.06.040.
   Google Scholar
• A. Pandžić, D. Hodžić, and E. Kadrić, Experimental investigation on influence of infill density on tensile mechanical properties of different FDM 3D printed materials, TEM J., vol. 10, pp. 1195–1201, 2021. DOI: 10.18421/TEM103-25.
   Google Scholar
• R. Miralbes, S. Higuera, D. Ranz, and J.A. Gomez, Comparative analysis of mechanical properties and energy absorption capabilities of functionally graded and non-graded thermoplastic sheet gyroid structures, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 29, no. 26, pp. 5142–5155, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1949509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Dialami, I. Rivet, M. Cervera, and M. Chiumenti, Computational characterization of polymeric materials 3D-printed via fused filament fabrication, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1357–1367, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2022.2032496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Selvaraj, E. Sudhagar, S. Kannan, G. Manickam, and A. Ankush, Mechanical characterization and dynamic behavior of 3D printed composite sandwich panel featuring hybrid semi-active core through experimental and numerical approach, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 29, no. 27, pp. 5689–5703, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1962456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Miralbes, J. Cuartero, D. Ranz, and N. Correia, Numerical simulations of gyroid structures under compressive loads, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., pp. 1–10, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2023.2192712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riiz Machinery Ltd. Co, FILAMEON. Available from www.filameon.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ultimaker CURA. Available from https://ultimaker.com/software/ultimaker-cura.
   Google Scholar
• H.K. Dave, N.H. Patadiya, A.R. Prajapati, and S.R. Rajpurohit, Effect of infill pattern and infill density at varying part orientation on tensile properties of fused deposition modeling-printed poly-lactic acid part, Proc. IMechE Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 235, no. 10, pp. 1811–1827, 2021. DOI: 10.1177/0954406219856383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaqus/Standart (Version 6.14), User’s manual, finite element software. Available from http://www.simulia. com.
   Google Scholar
• A. Rodríguez-Panes, J. Claver, and A.M. Camacho, The influence of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical behaviour of PLA and ABS pieces manufactured by FDM: A comparative analysis, Materials, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1333, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/ma11081333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar