Interaction of shock wave with closed cell foams: Effect of foam material, microstructure, and specimen configuration

References

• K. Senol, and A. Shukla, Dynamic response of closed cell PVC foams subjected to underwater shock loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 130, pp. 214–225, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.R. Feldgun, Y.S. Karinski, and D.Z. Yankelevsky, A two-phase model to simulate the 1-D shock wave propagation in porous metal foam, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 82, pp. 113–129, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhou, T. Wang, W. Zhu, X.-b. Bian, and G.-y. Huang, Evaluation of blast mitigation effects of hollow cylindrical barriers based on water and foam, Compos. Struct., vol. 282, pp. 115016, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Bouchahdane, N. Ouelaa, and A. Belaadi, Static and fatigue compression behaviour of conventional and auxetic open-cell foam, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 29, no. 27, pp. 6154–6167, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1972496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Song, W.W. Chen, and W.Y. Lu, Mechanical characterization at intermediate strain rates for rate effects on an epoxy syntactic foam, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 1336–1343, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Ling, J. Ivens, P. Cardiff, and M.D. Gilchrist, Deformation response of EPS foam under combined compression-shear loading. Part I: experimental design and quasi-static tests, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 144, pp. 480–489, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Ren, Q. Tao, L. Yin, Y. Ma, J. Wu, W. Zhao, Z. Mu, Z. Guo, and Z. Zhao, High-velocity impact response of metallic sandwich structures with PVC foam core, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 144, pp. 103657, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.M. Lee, D.H. Kim, D.-Y. Kim, M.S. Kim, J. Park, and G.H. Yoon, Enhancement of vibration attenuation and shock absorption in composite sandwich structures with porous foams and surface patterns, Compos. Struct., vol. 295, pp. 115755, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Liu, J. Yang, and H. Liu, Impact response of low-density foam impinging onto viscoelastic bar: a theoretical analysis, Compos. Struct., vol. 200, pp. 47–58, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.P. Daphalapurkar, J.C. Hanan, N.B. Phelps, H. Bale, and H. Lu, Tomography and simulation of microstructure evolution of a closed-cell polymer foam in compression, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 594–611, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/15376490802470523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.D. Henshall, The use of multiple diaphragms in shock tubes, J. Aeronautical Research Council. N. p. 1955. URL: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4314723
   Google Scholar
• R.A. Alpher, and D.R. White, Flow in shock tubes with area change at the diaphragm section, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 3, no. 05, pp. 457–470, 1958. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112058000124.
   Google Scholar
• X. Li, P. Zhang, L. Shiqiang, Z. Wang, and G. Wu, Dynamic response of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels under foam projectile impact, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 637–646, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2017.1308595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Cirne, R. Dormeval, et al., S. Ouellet, D. Frost, and A. Bouamoul, Using a shock tube to predict the response of polymeric foam to a blast loading., J. Phys. IV., vol. 134, pp. 783–787, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• M. Kazemi, Experimental investigation on the energy absorption characteristics of sandwich panels with layering of foam core under quasi-static punch loading, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 29, no. 21, pp. 3067–3075, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1885770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Zhao, and L. Jing, The response of clamped sandwich panels with layered-gradient aluminum foam cores to foam projectile impact, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 744–753, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2018.1495790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.A. Christou, L.R. Young, R. Goel, A.P. Vechart, and A. Jérusalem, Shock attenuation of PMMA sandwich panels filled with soda-lime glass beads: a fluid-structure interaction continuum model simulation, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 47, pp. 48–59, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Ye, W. Zhang, D. Li, W. Huang, W. Xie, X. Huang, and X. Jiang, Dynamic response and failure of sandwich plates with PVC foam core subjected to impulsive loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 109, pp. 121–130, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Xin, H. Yan, S. Cheng, and H. Li, Drop weight impact tests on composite sandwich panel of aluminum foam and epoxy resin, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 343–356, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2018.1564853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.W. Ma, and Z.Q. Ye, Analysis of foam claddings for blast alleviation, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 60–70, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Wang, S. Xu, and S. Hu, Experimental and numerical study of the effect of micro-structure on the rate-sensitivity of cellular foam, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 888–895, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2015.1047477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.W. Skews, M.D. Atkins, and M.W. Seitz, The impact of a shock wave on porous compressible foams, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 253, no. 1, pp. 245–265, 1993. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112093001788.
   Google Scholar
• M.D. Atkins, Shock wave interaction with porous compressible foams, D. University of the Witwatersrand. 1992. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10539/21333.
   Google Scholar
• R. Monti, Normal shock wave reflection on deformable solid walls, Meccanica, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 285–296, 1970. DOI: 10.1007/BF02145653.
   Google Scholar
• B.E. Gel’fand, S.A. Gubin, S.M. Kogarko, and O.E. Popov, Investigation of the special characteristics of the propagation and reflection of pressure waves in a porous medium, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 897–900, 1976. DOI: 10.1007/BF00852818.
   Google Scholar
• L. Gvozdeva, and Y.M. Faresov, Calculating the parameters of steady shock waves in porous compressible media, Zh. Tekh. Fiz., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 773–775, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• L.G. Gvozdeva, I.M. Faresov, J. Brossard, and N. Charpentier, Normal shock wave reflection on porous compressible material, Dynamics of Explosions; International Colloquium on Dynamics of Explosions and Reactive Systems, August 4–9, Berkeley, CA, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• L.G. Gvozdeva, V.N. Lyakhov, D.K. Raevskii, and Y.M. Faresov, Shock-wave propagation in a gas and a porous medium, Combust. Explos. Shock Waves, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 491–495, 1988. DOI: 10.1007/BF00749312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ouellet, D. Frost, and A. Bouamoul, Using a shock tube to predict the response of polymeric foam to a blast loading, J. Phys. IV France, vol. 134, pp. 783–787, 2006. DOI: 10.1051/jp4:2006134121.
   Google Scholar
• M.W. Seitz, and B.W. Skews, Effect of compressible foam properties on pressure amplification during shock wave impact, Shock Waves, vol. 15, no. 3–4, pp. 177–197, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-006-0033-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.S. Hattingh, and B.W. Skews, Experimental investigation of the interaction of shock waves with textiles, Shock Waves, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 115–123, 2001. DOI: 10.1007/PL00004064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Igra, and J.P. Jiang, Simulation of shock wave interaction with porous compressible foam, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G J. Aerosp. Eng., vol. 223, no. 3, pp. 297–306, 2009. DOI: 10.1243/09544100JAERO386.
   Google Scholar
• A. Britan, M. Liverts, H. Shapiro, and G. Ben-Dor, Blast wave mitigation by a particulate foam barrier, Transp. Porous Med., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 283–292, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11242-011-9865-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Del Prete, A. Chinnayya, L. Domergue, A. Hadjadj, and J.-F. Haas, Blast wave mitigation by dry aqueous foams, Shock Waves, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 39–53, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-012-0400-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Honghui, K. Kawai, M. Itoh, Y. Hongru, and J. Zonglin, The interaction between shock waves and foam in a shock tube, Acta Mech. Sin., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 288–301, 2002. DOI: 10.1007/BF02487956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.D. Goel, P. Altenhofer, V.A. Matsagar, A.K. Gupta, C. Mundt, and S. Marburg, Interaction of a shock wave with a closed cell aluminum metal foam, Combust. Explos. Shock Waves, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 373–380, 2015. DOI: 10.1134/S0010508215030144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R. Baer, A numerical study of shock wave reflections on low density foam, Shock Waves, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–124, 1992. DOI: 10.1007/BF01415901.
   Google Scholar
• H. Jeon, J.R. Gross, S. Estabrook, S. Koumlis, Q. Wan, G.R. Khanolkar, X. Tao, D.M. Mensching, E.J. Lesnick, and V. Eliasson, Shock wave attenuation using foam obstacles: does geometry matter, Aerospace, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 353–375, 2015. DOI: 10.3390/aerospace2020353.
   Google Scholar
• I.S. Sandhu, A. Sharma, Prince, M.K. Singh, R. Kumari, P.S. Alegaonkar, and D.R. Saroha, Study of blast wave pressure modification through rubber foam. Proc. Eng., vol. 173, pp. 570–576, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.099.
   Google Scholar
• O. Elfar, R. Rashad, and H. Megahed, Process parameters optimization for friction stir welding of pure aluminium to brass (CuZn30) using Taguchi technique, MATEC Web Conf., vol. 43, pp. 03005, 2016. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20164303005.
   Google Scholar
• J. Freudenberger, J. Göllner, M. Heilmaier, G. Mook, H. Saage, V. Srivastava, and U. Wendt, Materials Science and Engineering, in Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering, K.-H. Grote and E.K. Antonsson, Editors., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. pp. 73–222.
   Google Scholar
• H. Aretz, S. Keller, R. Vogt, and O. Engler, Modelling of ductile failure in aluminium sheet forming simulation, Int. J. Mater. Form., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 163–182, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s12289-010-1021-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.L. Zang, J. Liang, and C. Guo, A constitutive model for spring-back prediction in which the change of Young’s modulus with plastic deformation is considered, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1791–1797, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.E. Petel, F.X. Jetté, S. Goroshin, D.L. Frost, and S. Ouellet, Blast wave attenuation through a composite of varying layer distribution, Shock Waves, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 215–224, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-010-0295-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.W. Skews, The reflected pressure field in the interaction of weak shock waves with a compressible foam, Shock Waves, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 205–211, 1991. DOI: 10.1007/BF01413795.
   Google Scholar
• J.G. Nerenberg, Blast wave loading of polymeric foams, D. McGill University. 2000. URL: https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/8w32r770k.
   Google Scholar
• B. Koohbor, A. Kidane, and W. Y. Lu, Effect of specimen size, compressibility and inertia on the response of rigid polymer foams subjected to high velocity direct impact loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 98, pp. 62–74, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar