The Image is the Message: Instagram Marketing and the 2016 Presidential Primary Season

REFERENCES

• Bakhshi, S., D. Shamma, and E. Gilbert. 2014. “Faces Engage us: Photos with Faces Attract More Likes and Comments on Instagram.” CHI’14 Proceedings of the SIGHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, April 26–May 01, 2014, 965–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhshi, S., D. Shamma, L. Kennedy, and E. Gilbert. 2015. “Why We Filter Our Photos and How It Impacts Engagement.” International AAAI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 12–22. Oxford, UK. http://comp.social.gatech.edu/papers/icwsm15.why.bakhshi.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, A. 1991. Media Analysis Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., and R. Davis. 2003. Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L., and K. Dalrymple. 2016. “Politics in 140 Characters or Less: Campaign Communication, Network Interaction, and Political Participation in Twitter.” Journal of Political Marketing 15 (4):311–32. doi:10.1080/15377857.2014.959686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, P. 2009. “Comparing Visual Framing in Newspapers: Hurricane Katrina versus Tsunami.” Newspaper Research Journal 30 (1):50–57. doi:10.1177/073953290903000106
   Google Scholar
• Brader, T. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2):388–405. doi:10.2307/3647684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, H., and P. Schumacher. 2006. “The Relevance of Attention for Selecting News Content. An Eye-tracking Study on Attention Patterns in the Reception of Print and Online Media.” Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research 31:347–68. doi:10.1515/commun.2006.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canva. 2016. “Study: The Most Popular Instagram Filters From Around the World.” (Blog), Accessed February 10, 2016. https://designschool.canva.com/blog/popular-instagram-filters/.
   Google Scholar
• Childers, T., and M. Houston. 1984. “Conditions for a Picture-Superiority Effect on Consumer Memory.” Journal of Consumer Research 11:643–53. doi:10.1086/209001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. 2006. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Cmeciu, C. 2014. “Beyond the Online Faces of Romanian Candidates for the 2014 European Parliament Elections - A Visual Framing Analysis of Facebook Photographic Images.” In Ten Years of Facebook: Proceedings from the Third International Conference on Argumentation and Rhetoric, edited by G. Horvath, R. K. Bako, and E. Biro-Kaszas, 405–34. Nagyvarard, Romania: Partium Press. https://argumentor.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/argumentor-2014_horvath_bako_biro-kaszas_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R. 1999. The Web of Politics: The Internet’s Impact on the American Political System. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. 2005. Presidential Campaigns Fine-time Online Strategies. Journalism Studies 6 (2):241–244. doi:10.1080/14616700500057452
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M. 2015. “The Demographics of Social Media Users.” Pew Research. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/the-demographics-of-social-media-users/.
   Google Scholar
• Eldin, A. 2016. “Instagram Role in Influencing Youth Opinion in 2015 Election Campaign in Bahrain.” European Scientific Journal 12 (2):245–57. doi:10.19044/esj.2016.v12n2p245
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, N. 2015a. “How Does Your Brand Stack Up on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram?” (blog), Forrester. http://blogs.forrester.com/nate_elliott/15-09-15-how_does_your_brand_stack_up_on_facebook_twitter_and_instagram.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4):51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahmy, S. 2005. “Photojournalists’ and Photo-editors’ Attitudes and Perceptions: The Visual Coverage of 9/11 and the Afghan War.” Visual Communication Quarterly 12 (3–4):146–63. doi:10.1207/s15551407vcq1203&4_4
   Google Scholar
• Filimonov, K., U. Russman, and J. Svennsoon. 2016. “Picturing the Party: Instagram and Party Campaigning in the 2014 Swedish Elections.” Social Media and Society 2:1–11. doi:10.1177/2056305116662179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard, University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnow, T. 2013. “Facing Off: A Comparative Analysis of Obama and Romney Facebook Timeline Photographs.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (11):1584–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, M., and E. Bucy. 2009. Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, D. 1996. “Say It with Pictures.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546:85–96. doi:10.1177/0002716296546001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. 2013. “The Shift from Words to Pictures and Implications for Digital Marketers.” Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/onmarketing/2013/07/02/the-shift-from-words-to-pictures-and-implications-for-digital-marketers/#586b936c2549.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, M., S. Lynn, K. Walsdorf, and B. Hardin. 2002. “The Framing of Sexual Difference in SI for Kids Editorial Photos.” Mass Communication & Society 5 (3):341–59. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0503_6
   Google Scholar
• Highfield, T., and T. Leaver. 2015. “A Methodology for Mapping Instagram Hashtags.” First Monday 20 (1). doi:10.5210/fm.v20i1.5563.
   Google Scholar
• Holiday, S., M. Lewis, and J. LaBaugh. 2015. “Are You Talking to Me? The Socio-Political Visual Rhetoric of the Syrian Presidency’s Instagram Account.” Southwestern Mass Communication Journal 30 (2):1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., L. Manikonda, and S. Kambhampati. 2014. “What We Instagram: A First Analysis of Instagram Photo Content and User Types.” In Proceedings of International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 595–98. Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Instagram. 2016. “Press News.” www.instagram.com/press/?hl=en.
   Google Scholar
• Jaakonmaki, R., O. Muller, and J. vom Brocke. 2017. “The Impact of Content, Context, and Creator on User Engagement in Social Media Marketing.” Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 1152–60. Waikoloa, HI. http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/41289/1/paper0140.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kazin, M. 2016. “How Can Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders Both Be ‘Populist’?” The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/magazine/how-can-donald-trump-and-bernie-sanders-both-be-populist.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 2016. “President’s Visual Presentation in Their Official Photos: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the US and South Korea.” Cogent Arts & Humanities 3 (1):1–14. doi:10.1080/23311983.2016.1201967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D., M. Beckel, and C. Levine. 2016. “$1 Billion Spent in 2016 Presidential Race - and Other Numbers to Know.” The Center for Public Integrity. www.publicintegrity.org/2016/04/21/19580/1-billion-spent-2016-presidential-race-and-other-numbers-know.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. 2010. Open Leadership: How Social Technology Can Transform the Way You Lead. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., T. Feltwell, O. Ajuruchi, and S. Lawson. 2016. “Constructing the Visual Online Political Self: An Analysis of Instagram Use by the Scottish Electorate.” CHI’16 Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference, San Jose, CA, 3339–51, May 7–12, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Manikonda, L., V. Meduri, and S. Kambhampati. 2016. “Tweeting the Mind and Instagramming the Heart: Exploring Differentiated Content Sharing on Social Media.” In International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 639–42. Cologne, Germany. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.02718.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., T. B. Rogers, and P. Smythe. 1968. Why Are Pictures Easier to Recall Than Words? Psychonomic Science 11 (4):137–38. doi:10.3758/bf03331011
   Google Scholar
• Pieters, R., and M. Wedel. 2004. Attention Capture and Transfer in Adverting: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-size Effects. Journal of Marketing 68 (2):36–50. doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.2.36.27794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postelnicu, M., J. D. Martin, and K. D. Landreville. 2006. “The Role of Campaign Web Sites in Promoting Candidates and Attracting Campaign Resources.” The Internet Election, edited by A. P. Williams and J. C. Tedesco. 99–109. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, S. 2014. “What Fuels a Tweet’s Engagement.” Twitter Blog. https://blog.twitter.com/2014/what-fuels-a-tweets-engagement.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S., L. Bohan, P. McCafferty, and K. Harris. 1986. “The Image and the Vote: The Effect of Candidate Presentation on Voter Preference.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (2):108–27. doi:10.2307/2111296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russmann, U., and J. Svensson. 2017. “Interaction on Instagram? Glimpses from the 2014 Swedish Elections.” International Journal of E-Politics 8 (1):50–65. doi:10.4018/ijep.2017010104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schill, D. 2012. The Visual Image and the Political Image: A Review of Visual Communication Research in the Field of Political Communication. Review of Communication 12 (2):118–42. doi:10.1080/15358593.2011.653504
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. 1995. “Entertainers, Experts, or Public Servants? Politicians’ Self-Presentation on Television Talk Shows.” Political Communication 12 (2):211–21. doi:10.1080/10584609.1995.9963066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J. 2008. “Elected Representatives, Online Self-presentation and the Personal Vote: Party, Personality and Webstyles in the United States and United Kingdom.” Information, Communication and Society 11 (3):414–32. doi:10.1080/13691180802025681
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg, G. 2006. “Conceptual and Perceptual Factors in the Picture Superiority Effect.” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18 (6):813–47. doi:10.1080/09541440500412361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takumi. 2015. “The Half-life of Instagram Posts.” (blog) August 30, 2015. https://blog.takumi.com/the-half-life-of-instagram-posts-3db61fb1db75#.u4m1byjpw.
   Google Scholar
• Towner, T. 2013. “All Political Participation Is Socially Networked? New Media and the 2012 Election.” Social Science Computer Review 31 (5):527–41. doi:10.1177/0894439313489656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towner, T., and C. Muñoz. 2016. “Baby Boom or Bust? The New Media Effect on Political Participation.” Journal of Political Marketing 1–30. doi:10.1080/15377857.2016.1153561
   Google Scholar
• Twitter. 2016. “Company”. https://about.twitter.com/company.
   Google Scholar
• Wicklund, R., and P. Gollwitzer. 1982. Symbolic Self-completion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zarella, D. 2013. “Use Quotes and #Hashtags to Get More Retweets.” Dan Zarrella. http://danzarrella.com/new-data-use-quotes-and-hastags-to-get-more-retweets.
   Google Scholar
• Zarella, D. 2014. “The Science of Instagram.” Dan Zarrella. http://danzarrella.com/infographic-the-science-of-instagram/.
   Google Scholar