Teachers’ Attitudes About Using Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading (CBM-R) for Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring

REFERENCES

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ardoin, S.P., Christ, T.J., Morena, L.S., Cormier, D.C., & Klingbeil, D.A. (2013). A systematic review and summarization of the recommendations and research surrounding curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) decision rules. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, A.E., Stuebing, K.K., Anthony, J.L., Denton, C.A., Mathes, P.G., Fletcher, J.M., & Francis, D.J. (2008). Agreement among response to intervention criteria for identifying responder status. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 296–307. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J.C., & Martens, B.K. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ training in empirically- validated behavioral instruction practices. School Psychology Quarterly, 21, 262–285. doi:10.1521/scpq.2006.21.3.262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliem, C., & Davinroy, K. (1997). Teachers’ beliefs about assessment and instruction in literacy (CSE Technical Report 421). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research in Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, S., Gillis, M., Smith, T., Lavalette, M., Liss-Bronstein, L., Lowe, E., …, & Wilder, T. (2009). First grade teachers’ knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 425–455. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9166-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. (2010). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice ( 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., & Eckert, T.L. (2003). A comparison of school psychologists’ acceptability, training, and use of norm-referenced, curriculum-based, and brief experimental analysis methods to assess reading. School Psychology Review, 32, 272–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, T.J., & Ardoin, S.P. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Passage equivalence and probe-set development. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 55–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, T.J., Zopluoglu, C., Monaghen, B.D., & Van Norman, E.R. (2013). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Multi-study evaluation of schedule, duration, and dataset quality on progress monitoring outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 19–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S.K., Jones, C.D., Reutzel, R., & Andreasen, L. (2013). An examination of the influences of a teacher preparation program on beginning teachers’ reading instruction. Literacy Research and Instruction, 52, 87–105. doi:10.1080/19388071.2012.754520
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences ( rev. ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W., & Clark, V.L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deeney, T.A. (2010). One-minute fluency measures: Mixed messages in assessment and instruction. The Reading Teacher, 63, 440–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S.L. (2003). Deveopments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, T.L., Hintze, J.M., & Shapiro, E.S. (1999). Development and refinement of a measure for assessing the acceptability of assessment methods: The Assessment Rating Profile-Revised. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 15, 21–42. doi:10.1177/082957359901500103
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, T.L., Shapiro, E.S., & Lutz, J.G. (1995). Teachers’ ratings of the acceptability of curriculum-based assessment methods. School Psychology Review, 24, 497–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C.K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foegen, A., Espin, C., Allinder, R., & Markell, M. (2001). Translating research into practice: Preservice teachers’ beliefs about curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 226–236. doi:10.1177/002246690103400405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, F.J. (2009). Survey research methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M.K., & Jenkins, J.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Gischlar, K., Hilt-Panahon, A., Clemens, N., & Shapiro, E. (2011). The process of implementation and design for sustainability. In E. Shapiro, N. Zigmond, T. Wallace, & D. Marston (Eds.), Models for implementing response to intervention (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G.V., Peckham, P.D., & Sanders, J.R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42, 237–288. doi:10.3102/00346543042003237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, R., Kaminski, R., Dewey, E., Wallin, J., Powell-Smith, K., & Latimer, R. (2011). DIBELS Next Technical Manual DRAFT. Retrieved from http://oreg-onrti.org/files/u11/DIBELSNext_TechnicalManual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Green, S.B., & Salkind, N.J. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., & Graham, W.F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255–274. doi:10.3102/01623737011003255
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F.M., Gansle, K.A., Noell, G.H., Cohen, S., & Rosenblum, S. (1993). Treatment integrity of school-based behavioral intervention studies: 1980–90. School Psychology Review, 22, 254–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harry, B., Sturges, K.M., & Klingner, J.K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X034002003
   Google Scholar
• Henninger, K.L. (2010). Exploring the relationship between factors of implementation, treatment integrity and reading fluency (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3409588)
   Google Scholar
• Hosp, M.H., & Fuchs, L.S. (2005). Using CBM as an indicator of decoding, word reading, and comprehension: Do the relations change with grade? School Psychology Review, 34, 9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosp, M.K., Hosp, J.L., & Howell, K.W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, K.W., Hosp, J.L., & Kurns, S. (2008). Best practices in curriculum-based evaluation. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 349–362). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, M.J., Neessen, E., & Witt, J.C. (2008). Best practices in universal screening. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 103–114). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J.R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A.E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259–273. doi:10.1901/jaba.1980.13-259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller-Margulis, M.A. (2012). Fidelity of implementation framework: A critical need for response to intervention models. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 342–352. doi:10.1002/pits.21602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranzler, J.H., Miller, M.D., & Jordan, L. (1999). An examination of racial/ethnic and gender bias on curriculum- based measurement of reading. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 327–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mautone, J.A., DuPaul, G.J., Jitendra, A.K., Tresco, K.E., Vile Junod, R., & Volpe, R.J. (2009). The relationship between treatment integrity and acceptability of reading interventions for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 919–931. doi:10.1002/pits.20434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D., Green, L., Abbott, R.D., & Sanders, E. (2009). Further evidence for teacher knowledge: Supporting struggling readers in grades three through five. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 401–423. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9163-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of School Psychologists. (2008). NASP position statement: Prevention and intervention research in the schools. Bethesda, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Bethesda, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, I., & McNeil, K. (1998). Conducting survey research in the social sciences. New York, NY: University Press of America, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, A., Busch, T., Betts, J., Deno, S., & Long, J. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 427–469. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J., & Bolt, S. (2013). Assessment in special and inclusive education ( 12th ed.). New York, NY: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. (2007). The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency? Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 563–566. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P.J., Hamilton, A.M., Kuhn, M.R., Wisenbaker, J.M., & Stahl, S.A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 119–129. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E.S., & Eckert, T.L. (1994). Acceptability of curriculum-based assessment by school psychologists. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 167–183. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(94)90009-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, M.R. (2007). Identifying students at risk, monitoring performance and determining eligibility within response to intervention: Research on educational need and benefit from academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, M.R. (Ed.). (2008). Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem-solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Spear-Swerling, L., & Cheesman, E. (2011). Teachers’ knowledge base for implementing response-to-intervention models in reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1691–1723. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9338-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J.P., Reiser, B.J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387–431. doi:10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, P.M., Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–819. doi:10.1002/pits.20113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, J.C., & Elliott, S.N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. Advances in School Psychology, 4, 251–288.
   Google Scholar
• Yell, M., Deno, S., & Marston, D. (1992). Barriers to implementing curriculum-based measurement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 18, 99–112. doi:10.1177/153450849201800109
   Google Scholar