Effectiveness of a Universal, Interdependent Group Contingency Program on Children's Academic Achievement: A Countywide Evaluation

REFERENCES

• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barrish, H.H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M.M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bear, G.G., & Richards, H.C. (1980). An interdependent group-oriented contingency system for improving academic performance. School Psychology Review, 9, 190–193.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, K.D., Bradshaw, C.P., Domitrovich, C., & Ialongo, N.S. (2013). Coaching teachers to improve implementation of the Good Behavior Game. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 40, 482–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglan, A., Flay, B.R., Embry, D.D., & Sandler, I.N. (2012). The critical role of nurturing environments for promoting human well-being. American Psychologist, 67, 257–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C.P., Zmuda, J.H., Kellam, S.G., & Ialongo, N.S. (2009). Longitudinal impact of two universal preventative interventions in first grade on educational outcomes in high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 926–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, C.L., Tamm, L., & Gaub, M. (1997). Gender differences in children with ADHD, ODD, and co-occurring ADHD/ODD identified in a school population. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1706–1714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2014). Database of randomized controlled trials. Retrieved from http://www.coalition4evidence.org
   Google Scholar
• Darveaux, D.X. (1984). The Good Behavior Game plus merit. School Psychology Review, 13, 510–518.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, L.J., Kellam, S.G., Brown, C.H., Werthamer-Larsson, L., Rebok, G.W., Mayer, L.S., … & Wheeler, L. (1993). The short-term impact of two classroom-based preventive interventions on aggressive and shy behaviors and poor achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 14, 317–345.
   Google Scholar
• Domitrovich, C.E., Bradshaw, C.P., Greenberg, M.T., Embry, D., Poduska, J.M., & Ialongo, N.S. (2010). Integrated models of school-based prevention. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 71–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embry, D.D. (2002). The Good Behavior Game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 273–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embry, D.D. (2010). PAX manual for behavioral supports for users of the PAX Good Behavior Game. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Prevention and Early Intervention.
   Google Scholar
• Embry, D.D. (2013). PAX Plus Good Behavior Game kit. Tucson, AZ: PAXIS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Embry, D.D. (2014). PAX Good Behavior Game: What is it? Washington, DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Embry, D.D., & Biglan, A. (2008). Evidence-based kernels: Fundamental units of behavioral influence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11, 75–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embry, D.D., Staatemeier, G., Richardson, C., Lauger, K., & Mitich, J. (2003). The PAX Good Behavior Game. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, J.D., Pannozzo, G.M., & Voelkl, K.E. (1995). Disruptive and inattentive-withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. Elementary School Journal, 95, 421–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaub, M., & Carlson, C.L. (1997). Gender differences in ADHD: A meta-analysis and critical review. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1036–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gettinger, M., & Walter, M.J. (2012). Classroom strategies to enhance academic engaged time. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 653–673). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, V.W., & Sherman, J.A. (1972). Use and analysis of the Good Behavior Game to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 405–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ialongo, N.S., Werthamer, L., Kellam, S.G., Brown, C.H., Wang, S., & Lin, Y. (1999). Proximal impact of two first-grade preventive interventions on the early risk behaviors for later substance abuse, depression, and antisocial behavior. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 599–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A.E. (2003). Research design in clinical psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kellam, S.G., Brown, C.H., Poduska, J.M., Ialongo, N.S., Wang, W., Toyinbo, P., … & Wilcox, H.C. (2008). Effects of a universal classroom behavior management program in first and second grades on young adult behavioral, psychiatric, and social outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, S5–S28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellam, S.G., Mackenzie, A.C., Brown, C.H., Poduska, J.M., Wang, W., Petras, H., & Wilcox, H.C. (2011). The Good Behavior Game and the future of prevention and treatment. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 6, 73–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kellam, S.G., Mayer, L.S., Rebok, G.W., & Hawkins, W.E. (1998). Effects of improving achievement on aggressive behavior and of improving aggressive behavior on achievement through two preventive interventions. In B.P. Dohrenwend (Ed.), Adversity, stress, and psychopathology (pp. 486–505). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H.H., & Thibaut, J.W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinman, K.E., & Saigh, P.A. (2011). The effects of the Good Behavior Game on the conduct of regular education New York City students. Behavior Modification, 35, 95–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leflot, G., van Lier, P.A., Onghena, P., & Colpin, H. (2010). The role of teacher behavior management in the development of disruptive behaviors: An intervention study with the Good Behavior Game. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 869–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Little, S.G., Akin-Little, A., & Newman-Eig, L.M. (2010). Effects on homework completion and accuracy of varied and constant reinforcement within an interdependent group contingency system. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 26, 115–131.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y.Y., & Cartledge, G. (2004). Total class peer tutoring and interdependent group oriented contingency: Improving the academic and task related behaviors of fourth-grade urban students. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 235–262.
   Google Scholar
• Maggin, D.M., Johnson, A.H., Chafouleas, S.M., Ruberto, L.M., & Berggren, M. (2012). A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 625–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, K.B., & Hopkins, B.L. (1973). The modification of sentence structure and its relationship to subjective judgments of creativity in writing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 425–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKissick, C., Hawkins, R.O. , Lentz, F. E., Hailly, J., & McGuire, S. (2010). Randomizing multiple contingency components to decrease disruptive behaviors and increase student engagement in an urban, second grade classroom. Psychology in Schools, 47, 944–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medland, M.B., & Stachnik, T.J. (1972). Good Behavior Game: A replication and systematic analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moilanen, K.L., Shaw, D.S., & Maxwell, K.L. (2010). Developmental cascades: Externalizing, internalizing, and academic competence from middle childhood to early adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 635–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices. (2014). PAX Good Behavior Game. Washington, DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Northwest Evaluation Association. (2003). Technical manual for the NWEA measures of academic progress and achievement level tests. Portland, OR: Northwest Evaluation Association.
   Google Scholar
• Northwest Evaluation Association. (2011). RIT scale norms study. Portland, OR: Northwest Evaluation Association.
   Google Scholar
• Northwest Evaluation Association. (2013a). Common Core MAP: Supporting your transition to the Common Core. Portland, OR: Northwest Evaluation Association.
   Google Scholar
• Northwest Evaluation Association. (2013b). Measures of academic progress manual. Portland, OR: Northwest Evaluation Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ohio Department of Education. (2014). Free and Reduced Price Meal Eligibility: 2013 data. Retrieved from fttp://ode.state.oh.us/MR81/MR81_October_2013/2013%20MR81%20traditional.txt
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, D.N., Skinner, C.H., & Skinner, A.L. (2010). Supplementing accelerated reading with classwide interdependent group‐oriented contingencies. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 887–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poduska, J.M., Kellam, S.G., Wang, W., Brown, C.H., Ialongo, N.S., & Toyinbo, P. (2008). Impact of the Good Behavior Game, a universal classroom-based behavior intervention, on young adult service use for problems with emotions, behavior, or drugs or alcohol. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, S29–S44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poncy, B.C., & Skinner, C.H. (2011). Combining class-wide cover, copy, and compare (CCC) with an interdependent group contingency to enhance addition-fact fluency in a first-grade classroom. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, J., & Skinner, C.H. (2003). Enhancing academic performance in a classroom serving students with serious emotional disturbance: Interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected components. School Psychology Review, 32, 282–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E.A., Levine, S.C., & Beilock, S.L. (2013). Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14, 187–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt, D., Theodore, L.A., Bray, M.A., & Kehle, T.J. (2009). Improving homework accuracy: Interdependent group contingencies and randomized components. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 471–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertshaw, C.S., & Hiebert, H.D. (1973). The astronaut game: A group contingency applied to a first grade classroom. School Applications of Learning Theory, 6, 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Saigh, P.A. (1987). The effects of an academic achievement game on the spelling performance of limited English proficiency students. Journal of Special Education, 11, 73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, S.R., & Skinner, C.H. (2004). Using interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected criteria and paired reading to enhance class-wide reading performance. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 20, 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, E. (2007). On the clock: Rethinking the way schools use time. Washington, DC: Education Sector.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C.H., Cashwell, T.H., & Skinner, A.L. (2000). Increasing tootling: The effects of a peer-monitored group contingency program on students’ reports of peers’ prosocial behaviors. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 263–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C.H., Williams, R.L., & Neddenriep, C.E. (2004). Using interdependent group-oriented reinforcement to enhance academic performance in general education classrooms. School Psychology Review, 33, 384–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). National Registry for Evidence-Based Programs and Practice. Retrieved at http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tingstrom, D.H., Sterling-Turner, H.E., & Wilczynski, S.M. (2006). The Good Behavior Game: 1969–2002. Behavior Modification, 30, 225–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). State and county quick facts. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html
   Google Scholar
• van Craeyevelt, S., Leflot, G., Onghena, P., & Coplin, H. (2012, June). Can the Good Behavior Game improve academic achievement? Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier,P. A., Huizink, A., & Crijnen, A. (2009). Impact of a preventive intervention targeting childhood disruptive behavior problems on tobacco and alcohol initiation from age 10 to 13 years. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 100, 228–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lier, P.A., Muthén, B.O., van der Sar, R.M., & Crijnen, A.A. (2004). Preventing disruptive behavior in elementary schoolchildren: Impact of a universal classroom-based intervention. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 72, 467–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lier, P.A., Vuijk, P., & Crijnen, A.A. (2005). Understanding mechanisms of change in the development of antisocial behavior: The impact of a universal intervention. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 521–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R.A., & McCurdy, B.L. (2012). Class-wide positive behavior support and group contingencies: Examining a positive variation of the Good Behavior Game. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar