Using Growth Norms to Set Instructional Goals for Struggling Students

References

• Ardoin, S. P., Christ, T. J., Morena, L. S., Cormier, D. C., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2013). A systematic review and summarization of recommendations and research surrounding curriculum based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) decision rules. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettebenner, D. (2011). A technical overview of the student growth percentile methodology: Student growth percentiles and percentile growth projections/trajectories (Technical Report). Dover, NH: National Center on Improvement of Educational Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, D. M., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Patterson, M. J. (2010). Students, teachers, and schools as sources of variability, integrity and sustainability in implementing progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 39(4), 612–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capizzi, A. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Effects of curriculum-based measurement with and without diagnostic feedback on teacher planning. Remedial and Special Education, 26(3), 159–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, T. J. (2006), Short-term estimates of growth using curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: Estimating standard error of the slope to construct confidence intervals. School Psychology Review, 35(1), 128–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, T. J., & Aranas, Y. A. (2014). Best practices in problem analysis. In P. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative decision making. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shinn, M. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurements to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30(4), 507–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretsen, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Deno, S. L. (1985). Importance of goal ambitiousness and goal mastery to student achievement. Exceptional Children, 52(1), 63–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Allinder, R. M. (1991). Effects of expert system advice within curriculum-based measurement on teacher planning and student achievement in spelling. School Psychology Review, 20, 49–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59, 636–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hosp, M. K., & Hosp, J. L. (2003). Curriculum-based assessment in reading, spelling, and mat: How to do it and why. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 48(1), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J., & Terjesen, K. J. (2011). Monitoring reading growth: Goal setting, measurement frequency, and methods of evaluation. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26, 28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, M., Keesey, S., Ressa, V. A., Alexeeff, M., Chan, P. E., & Peters, M. J. (2014). Setting clear learning targets to guide instruction for all students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 76–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNamara, A., Holmes, P., & Collins, D. (2006). The pathway to excellence: the role of psychological characteristics in negotiating the challenges of musical development. British Journal of Music Education, 23(3), 285–30
   Google Scholar
• Renaissance Learning. (2013a). STAR Early Literacy: Technical manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author. Available from Renaissance Learning by request to [email protected]
   Google Scholar
• Renaissance Learning. (2013b). STAR Math: Technical manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author. Available from Renaissance Learning by request to [email protected]
   Google Scholar
• Renaissance Learning. (2013c). STAR Reading: Technical manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author. Available from Renaissance Learning by request to [email protected]
   Google Scholar
• Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. E. (2013). Assessment in special and inclusive education (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, S. G., Carlisle, J. F., Scott, S. E., & Zeng, J. (2007). Are fluency measures accurate predictors of oral reading achievement? Elementary School Journal, 107, 429–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., & Guard, K. B. (2014). Best practices in setting progress monitoring goals for academic skill improvement. In P. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.). Best practices in school psychology: Student level services. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education: National Center on Response to Intervention. (2011a). Review of screening tools [Review of STAR Early Literacy]. Washington, DC: Author. Available online from http://www.rti4success.org/resources/tools-charts/screening-tools-chart
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education: National Center on Response to Intervention. (2011b). Review of screening tools [Review of STAR Math]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/resources/tools-charts/screening-tools-chart
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education: National Center on Response to Intervention. (2011c). Review of screening tools [Review of STAR Reading]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/resources/tools-charts/screening-tools-chart
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education: National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2012a). Review of progress monitoring tools [Review of STAR Early Literacy]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.intensiveintervention.org/chart/progress-monitoring
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education: National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2012b). Review of progress monitoring tools [Review of STAR Math]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.intensiveintervention.org/chart/progress-monitoring
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education: National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2012c). Review of progress monitoring tools [Review of STAR Reading]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.intensiveintervention.org/chart/progress-monitoring
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, R., Yukelson, D., Burton, D., & Weigard, D. (1994, August). Goals and athletic performance: Interviews with collegiate athletes. Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Applied Sport Psychology annual meeting, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Yen, W. (2007). Vertical scaling and no child left behind. In N. J. Dorans, M. Pommerich, & P. J. Holland (Eds.), Linking and aligning scores and scales (pp. 273–283). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar