The Effects of Fidget Spinners on Oral Reading Fluency

References

• Al-Eisa, E., Buragadda, S., & Melam, G. R. (2013). Effect of therapy ball seating on learning and sitting discomforts among Saudi female students. BioMed Research International, 2013, 153165. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/153165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. A., & Fuller, G. B. (2010). Effect of music on reading comprehension of junior high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(3), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspiranti, K. B., & Hulac, D. M. (2021). Using fidget spinners to improve on-task classroom behavior for students with ADHD. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(2), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00588-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagatell, N., Mirigliani, G., Patterson, C., Reyes, Y., & Test, L. (2010). Effectiveness of therapy ball chairs on classroom participation in children with autism spectrum disorders. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 64(6), 895–903. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2010.09149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, R. J., Clarke, A. R., McCarthy, R., Selikowitz, M., & Rushby, J. A. (2005). Arousal and activation in a continuous performance task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.19.2.91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, J. (2021, October 28). Best fidget toys for anxiety. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from https://www.chicagotribune.com/consumer-reviews/sns-bestreviews-games-best-fidget-toys-for-anxiety-20211027-yezu5zcbtbgjheiiedqxeelgmm-story.html.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. F., & Young, S. L. (2011). Are choice-making opportunities needed in the classroom? Using self-determination theory to consider student motivation and learner empowerment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T., Andrade, H. L., & Chen, F. (2015). Accuracy in student self-assessment: Directions and cautions for research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(4), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P., Saleh, W., & Pai, C. (2017). Texting and walking: A controlled field study of crossing behaviours and inattentional blindness in Taiwan. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(4), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1240234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. J., Bravi, R., & Minciacchi, D. (2018). The effect of fidget spinners on fine motor control. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 3144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21529-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Copeland, L., & Gedeon, T. (2015, December). Visual distractions effects on reading in digital environments: A comparison of first and second English language readers. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (pp. 506–516.).
   Google Scholar
• Croley, K. E., Drevon, D. D., Decker, D. M., Hixson, M. D., & Radley, K. C. (2023). The effect of the fidget cube on classroom behavior among students with perceived attention difficulties. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 16(2), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00734-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, T. L., Eggleston, B. N., Hamsho, N. F., & Williams, N. L. (2021). Assessing children’s perceptions of intervention acceptability ratings. Psychology in the Schools, 58(10), 1962–1979. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, T. L., Hier, B. O., Hamsho, N. F., & Malandrino, R. D. (2017). Assessing children’s perceptions of academic interventions: The kids intervention profile. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 32(2), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedewa, A. L., & Erwin, H. E. (2011). Stability balls and students with attention and hyperactivity concerns: Implications for on-task and in-seat behavior. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 65(4), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.000554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziano, P. A., Garcia, A. M., & Landis, T. D. (2020). To fidget or not to fidget, that is the question: A systematic classroom evaluation of fidget spinners among young children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 24(1), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054718770009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, C. M., Murphy, G., & Januszewski, J. (2017). Under perceptual load, observers look But do not see. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodner, K. (2015). To fidget or not to fidget: The effect of movement on cognition (Publication No. 1599141) [Master’s Thesis, Nova Southeastern University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hulac, D. M., Aspiranti, K., Kriescher, S., Briesch, A. M., & Athanasiou, M. (2021). A multisite study of the effect of fidget spinners on academic performance. Contemporary School Psychology, 25(4), 582–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00292-y
   Google Scholar
• Hulac, D. M., Mickelson, L. R., Briesch, A. M., Maroeca, H., Hartjes, C., Anderson, K., & Ederveen, K. (2020). Stability balls and student on-task behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 31(3), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09412-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco, R. (2012). In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2236–2243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco, R. (2015). Student class standing, Facebook use, and academic performance. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1981). Acceptability of child treatment techniques: The influence of treatment efficacy and adverse side effects. Behavior Therapy, 12(4), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(81)80087-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalaf, R. T., Gurevich, Y., Marwan, A. I., Miller, A. L., Kramer, R. E., & Sahn, B. (2018). Button battery powered fidget spinners: A potentially deadly new ingestion hazard for children. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 66(4), 595–597. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koiler, R., Schimmel, A., Bakhshipour, E., Shewokis, P. A., & Getchell, N. (2022). The impact of fidget spinners on fine motor skills in individuals with and without ADHD: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 12(03), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbbs.2022.123005
   Google Scholar
• Kriescher, S. A., Hulac, D. M., King, B., & Ryan, A. (2023). Evaluating the evidence for fidget toys in the classroom. Intervention in School and Clinic, 59(1), 66–69. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512221130070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, K. T., Barnes, M. A., Miciak, J., Roberts, G., Halverson, K. K., Vaughn, S., & Cirino, P. T. (2021). Sustained attention and behavioral ratings of attention in struggling readers. Scientific Studies of Reading: The Official Journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 25(5), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1826950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, K. E., & Elder, A. D. (2018). Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0096-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mautone, J. A., DuPaul, G. J., Jitendra, A. K., Tresco, K. E., Junod, R. V., & Volpe, R. J. (2009). The relationship between treatment integrity and acceptability of reading interventions for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulé, C. M., Daniels, B., Volpe, R. J., Briesch, A. M., Joseph, L. M., Harris, K., … Leslie, L. K. (2018). A comparative effectiveness study of two high-frequency word interventions: Traditional drill and wordsheets. Journal of Behavioral Education, 27(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-017-9287-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson. (2021). Aimsweb plus reading curriculum-based measurement administration and scoring guide. Retrieved from https://www.pearsonassessments.com/content/dam/school/global/clinical/us/assets/aimsweb/aimswebplus-reading-administration-and-scoring-guide-grades-2-8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson. (2017). Aimsweb plus technical manual. Retrieved from https://www.marshfieldschools.org/cms/lib/WI01919828/Centricity/Domain/82/Plus%20Technical%20Manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Axtell, P. K. (2005). An investigation of the reliability and standard error of measurement of words read correctly per minute using curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290502300403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapport, M. D., Bolden, J., Kofler, M. J., Sarver, D. E., Raiker, J. S., & Alderson, R. M. (2009). Hyperactivity in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A ubiquitous core symptom or manifestation of working memory deficits? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(4), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9287-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning (PREL).
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11(10) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7275/9wph-vv65
   Google Scholar
• Sammer, M. B., Kan, J. H., Sammer, M. D., & Donnelly, L. F. (2018). Radiographic appearance and clinical significance of fidget spinner ingestions. Pediatric Radiology, 48(11), 1584–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4179-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schecter, R. A., Shah, J., Fruitman, K., & Milanaik, R. L. (2017). Fidget spinners: Purported benefits, adverse effects and accepted alternatives. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 29(5), 616–618. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoolcraft, N. (2018). Student and teacher perceptions of stability balls as alternative seating in a first grade classroom. The Journal of Teacher Action, 4(3), 90–111.
   Google Scholar
• Stalvey, S., & Brasell, H. M. (2006). Using stress balls to focus the attention of sixth-grade Learners. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 12(2), 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling-Turner, H. E., & Watson, T. S. (2002). An analog investigation of the relationship between treatment acceptability and treatment integrity. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014333305011
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Schuur, W. A., Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilev, M. R., Kirkby, J. A., & Angele, B. (2018). Auditory distraction during reading: A Bayesian meta-analysis of a continuing controversy. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 13(5), 567–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617747398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Mizener, B. H., & Williams, R. L. (2008). The effects of student choices on academic performance. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11(2), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708323372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterschoot, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2019). The effects of experimentally induced choice on elementary school children’s intrinsic motivation: The moderating role of indecisiveness and teacher–student relatedness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 188, 104692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., Pasquale, D. D., & Nosko, A. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz, M., & Çetinkaya, E. (2017). The relationship between good reader’s attention, reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050309
   Google Scholar