The influence of race, gender, family, and employment status on probationer sanctioning for noncompliance

References

• Albonetti, C. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247–266. doi:10.2307/800532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allspach, A. (2010). Landscapes of (neo-) liberal control: The transcarceral spaces of federally sentenced women in Canada. Gender, Place and Culture, 17(6), 705–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumer, E. P. (2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 231–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickle, G. S., & Peterson, R. D. (1991). The impact of gender-based family roles on criminal sentencing. Social Problems, 38(3), 372–394. doi:10.1525/sp.1991.38.3.03a00050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, G. S., & Steen, S. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 554–570. doi:10.2307/2657267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buglar, S. (2016). The ‘focal concerns’ of parole board decision-making: A thematic analysis. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 27(3), 285–302. doi:10.1080/10345329.2016.12036047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, M. (2006). Judicial monitoring of compliance: Introducing ‘problem solving’ approaches to domestic violence courts in England and Wales. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 20(3), 366–378. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebl017
   Google Scholar
• Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (2003). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cano, M. V., & Spohn, C. (2012). Circumventing the penalty for offenders facing mandatory minimums: Revisiting the dynamics of “sympathetic” and “salvageable” offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(3), 308–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (1987a). Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law & Society Review, 21(2), 267–290. doi:10.2307/3053522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (1987b). Discrimination in the criminal courts: Family, gender, and the problem of equal treatment. Social Forces, 66(1), 152–175. doi:10.2307/2578905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, S. (2003). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, black, and white felony arrestees. Criminology, 41(3), 873–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, D. (2004). The impact of gender and race-ethnicity in the pretrial release process. Social Problems, 51(2), 222–242. doi:10.1525/sp.2004.51.2.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiburger, T. L. (2009). The effects of gender, family status, and race on sentencing decisions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(3), n/a–395. doi:10.1002/bsl.901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiburger, T. L. (2011). The impact of gender, offense type, and familial role on the decision to incarcerate. Social Justice Research, 24(2), 143–167. doi:10.1007/s11211-011-0133-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiburger, T. L., & Hilinski, C. M. (2010). The impact of race, gender, and age on the pretrial decision. Criminal Justice Review, 35(3), 318–334. doi:10.1177/0734016809360332
   Google Scholar
• Freiburger, T. L., & Sheeran, A. M. (2020). The joint effects of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on the incarceration and sentence length decisions. Race and Justice, 10(2), 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, L. A., Pate, M., & Sarver, M. (2011). Risk and revocation in community corrections: The role of gender. Probation Journal, 58(3), 250–264. doi:10.1177/0264550511409966
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P. A., Steadman, H. J., & Petrila, J. (2002). The use of criminal charges and sanctions in mental health courts. Psychiatric Services, 53(10), 1285–1289. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.53.10.1285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, T., & Wooldredge, J. (2006). Sex‐based disparities in felony dispositions before versus after sentencing reform in Ohio. Criminology, 44(4), 893–923. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, R. D., Maddan, S., & Spohn, C. C. (2007). Concerning conceptualization and operationalization: Sentencing data and the focal concerns perspective–a research note. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 4(1), 58–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. F. (1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 2(3), 207–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, K., Smith, C., & O’Sullivan, C. S. (1998). Batterer intervention: Program approaches and criminal justice strategies. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Holleran, D., & Spohn, C. (2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research. Criminology, 42(1), 211–240. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00518.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebner, B. M., & Bynum, T. S. (2006). An analysis of parole decision making using a sample of sex offenders: A focal concerns perspective. Criminology, 44(4), 961–991. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00069.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J. (2001). Interaction effects in logistic regression (Vol. 135) (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffries, S., & Bond, C. E. (2013). Does a therapeutic court context matter?: The likelihood of imprisonment for Indigenous and non-Indigenous offenders sentenced in problem-solving courts. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 41(1), 100–114. doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaeble, D. (2018). Probation and parole in the United States, 2016, NCJ 251148. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Kaeble, D., & Cowhig, M. (2018). Correctional populations in the United States, 2016, NCJ 251211. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsnorth, R. F., & MacIntosh, R. C. (2007). Intimate partner violence: The role of suspect gender in prosecutorial decision‐making. Justice Quarterly, 24(3), 460–495. doi:10.1080/07418820701485395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsnorth, R. F., Macintosh, R. C., Berdahl, T., Blades, C., & Rossi, S. (2001). Domestic violence: The role of interracial/ethnic dyads in criminal court processing. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17(2), 123–141. doi:10.1177/1043986201017002004
   Google Scholar
• Matejkowski, J., Festinger, D. S., Benishek, L. A., & Dugosh, K. L. (2011). Matching consequences to behavior: Implications of failing to distinguish between noncompliance and nonresponsivity. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34(4), 269–274. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, C. (2016). The role of courtroom workgroups in felony case dispositions: An analysis of workgroup familiarity and similarity. Law & Society Review, 50(3), 637–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardulli, P. F., Eisenstein, J., & Flemming, R. B. (1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Pinchevsky, G. M., & Steiner, B. (2016). Sex-based disparities in pretrial release decisions and outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 62(3), 308–340. doi:10.1177/0011128713482415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, B., & Dollar, C. B. (2013). Examining mental health court completion: A focal concerns perspective. The Sociological Quarterly, 54(4), 647–669. doi:10.1111/tsq.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, N., & Webb, V. J. (2007). Probation violations, revocations, and imprisonment: The decisions of probation officers, prosecutors, and judges pre- and post- mandatory drug treatment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18(1), 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Romain, D. M. (2017). Examining the processes of social construction on decision-making in domestic violence probation review hearings (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1957415691?pq-origsite=gscholar
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse surveys. New York: John Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Schulenberg, J. L. (2007). Predicting noncompliant behavior: Disparities in the social locations of male and female probationers. Justice Research and Policy, 9(1), 25–57.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (1999). Gender and sentencing of drug offenders: Is chivalry dead? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9(3–4), 365–399. doi:10.1177/088740349900900305
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38(1), 281–306. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00891.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race–ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(3), 241–261. doi:10.1007/s10940-006-9010-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31(3), 411–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Painter-Davis, N., & Ulmer, J. (2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Sociological Perspectives, 60(4), 810–833. doi:10.1177/0731121416679371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). Interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–797. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, K. F., & Henderson, H. (2015). On the precipice of intersectionality: The influence of race, gender, and offense severity interactions on probation outcomes. Criminal Justice Review, 40(3), 361–377. doi:10.1177/0734016815577194
   Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, K. F., & Henderson, H. (2016). Inequality on probation: An examination of differential probation outcomes. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 14(1), 1–20. doi:10.1080/15377938.2015.1030527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tapia, M., & Harris, P. M. (2006). Race and revocation: Is there a penalty for young, minority males? Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 4(3), 1–25. doi:10.1300/J222v04n03_01
   Google Scholar
• Tasca, M., Cho, A., Spohn, C., & Rodriguez, N. (2019). The role of parental status and involvement in sentence length decisions: A comparison of men and women sentenced to prison. Crime & Delinquency, 65(14), 1899–1924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29(1), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J., Painter-Davis, N., & Tinik, L. (2016). Disproportional imprisonment of black and Hispanic males: Sentencing discretion, processing outcomes, and policy structures. Justice Quarterly, 33(4), 642–681. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.958186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (n.d.). QuickFacts: April 10. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/
   Google Scholar
• Van Cleve, N. G. (2016). Crook County: Racism and injustice in America’s largest criminal court. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Mears, D. P. (2015). Sentencing and state‐level racial and ethnic contexts. Law & Society Review, 49(4), 883–915. doi:10.1111/lasr.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall, J. L. (2008). Prosecutors in problem solving courts. In J. Worrall & M. E. Nugent-Borakove (Eds.), The changing role of the American prosecutor (pp. 231–244). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar