Johnson's Differentiation Theory: Is It Really Empirically Supported?

REFERENCES

• Anderson, K. L. (2009). Gendering coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15, 1444–1457. doi: 10.1177/1077801209346837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bancroft, L., Silverman, J. G. & Ritchie, D. (2012). The batterer as parent (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. C., Webster, D. W. & Glass, N. (2009). The danger assessment: Validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 653–674. doi: 10.1177/0886260508317180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.A. v. J.B. (2011). Ind. App. Unpub. LEXIS 957 (Ind. App.).
   Google Scholar
• Dobash, E. & Dobash, E. (1979). Violence against wives. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dragiewicz, M. (2008). Patriarchy reasserted: Fathers’ rights and anti-VAWA activism. Feminist Criminology, 3(2), 121–144. doi: 10.1177/1557085108316731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, D. G. (2007). Rethinking domestic violence. Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• E.J. v. D.J. (2011a). Brief of appellant. Retrieved from http://www.dvleap.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=AiV3EqX0T8Q%3d&tabid=179
   Google Scholar
• E.J. v. D.J. 14 A.3d 1136 (D.C. App. 2011b).
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D. (1999). Effective intervention in domestic violence cases: Rethinking the roles of prosecutors, judges, and the court system. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 11, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, L. (2008). Questions about family court domestic violence screening and assessment. Family Court Review, 46, 523–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00217.x
   Google Scholar
• Frieze, I. H. & McHugh, M. C. (1992). Power and influence strategies in violent and nonviolent marriages. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16(4), 449–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye, V., Manganello, J., Campbell, J. C., Walton-Moss, B. & Wilt, S. (2006). The distribution of and factors associated with intimate terrorism and situational couple violence among a population-based sample of urban women in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(10), 1286–1313. doi: 10.1177/0886260506291658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, M. & Goldstein, B. (Eds.). (2009). Domestic violence, abuse and child custody: Legal strategies and policy issues. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Holzworth-Munroe, A. & Meehan, J. (2004). Typologies of men who are maritally violent: Scientific and clinical implications. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1365–1389. doi: 10.1177/0886260504269693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://nursing.jhu.edu/faculty_research/faculty/faculty-directory/community-publichealt h/jacquelyn-campbell last visited January 3, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• In re Morrison & Zacharia. WL 1163832 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, P. G., Crooks, C. V. & Poisson, S. E. (2003). Common misconceptions in addressing domestic violence in child custody disputes. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 54, 57–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6988.2003.tb00086.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, P. G., Johnston, J. R., Crooks, C. V. & Bala, N. (2008). Custody disputes involving allegations of domestic violence: Toward a differentiated approach to parenting plans. Family Court Review, 46, 500–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00216.x
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, P. G., Lemon, N. K. D. & Poisson, S. (2002). Child custody and domestic violence: A call for safety and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• JML v CAL. (2003). A-00660–02T3 brief of appellant. Retrieved from http://www.dvleap.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Oyo7BMkR5LI%3d&tabid=179
   Google Scholar
• JML v CAL. (2012, July 30). Opinion, superior court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. (On file with author).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (n.d.). www.personal.psu.edu/mpg/MPG/Welcome.html
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294. doi: 10.2307/353683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. P. & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00948.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. P. & Leone, J. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26(3), 322–349. doi: 10.1177/0192513X04270345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. B. & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46, 476–479. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x
   Google Scholar
• Leone, J. M., Johnson, M. P., Cohan, C. L. & Lloyd, S. E. (2004). Consequences of male partner violence for low-income minority women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 472–790. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2455.2004.00014.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. R. (1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 1. doi: 10.2307/1289533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malenko v. Handrahan. (2009). 979 A.2d 1269 (ME.).
   Google Scholar
• Meier, J. (2003). Domestic violence, child custody and child protection: Understanding judicial resistance and imagining the solutions. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy, and the Law, 11, 657–724.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, J. (2009). A historical perspective on parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation. Journal of Child Custody, 6, 232–257. doi: 10.1080/15379410903084681
   Google Scholar
• Meier, J. (2015). Differentiating domestic violence types: Profound paradigm shift, or old wine in new bottles. In B. Goldstein & M. Hannah (Eds.), Domestic violence, abuse and child custody: Legal strategies and policy issues (Vol. 2). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Neustein, A. & Lesher, M. (2005). From madness to mutiny: Why mothers are running from the family court and what to do about it. Lebanon, NH.
   Google Scholar
• Pence, E. (n.d.). Duluth abuse intervention project. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9dZOgr78eE (last visited January 3, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Pence, E. & Das DasGupta, S. (2006). Re-examining ‘battering': Are all acts of violence against intimate partners the same? Praxis International, Inc., Retrieved from http://www.praxisinternational.org/files/praxis/files/ReexaminingBattering.pdf (last visited January 3, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, L. N., Dragiewicz, M. & Gibbs, J. C. (2009). Fathers’ rights groups: Demographic correlates and impact on custody policy. Violence Against Women, 15, 513–537. doi: 10.1177/1077801209331409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem, P., Kulak, D. & Deutsch, R. M. (2007). Triaging family court services: The Connecticut judicial branch's family civil intake screen. Pace Law Review, 27, 741.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. G., Faller, K. C. & Tolman, R. M. (2011). Child custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic abuse allegations: Their relationship to evaluator demographics, background, domestic violence knowledge and custody-visitation recommendations. Final Technical Report Submitted to the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Oct. 31, 2011. http://ssw.umich.edu/about/profiles/saunddan/Custody-Evaluators-Beliefs-About-Domestic-Abuse-Allegations-Final-Tech-Report-to-NIJ-10-31-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sillito, C. (2012). Gendered physical and emotional health consequences of situational couple violence for heterosexual married and cohabiting couples. Feminist Criminology, 7(4), 255–281. doi: 10.1177/1557085111431695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, E. (2006). Commentary on Johnson's “conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence”. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1019–1025. doi: 10.1177/1077801206293329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, E. (2009). Rethinking custody evaluation in cases involving domestic violence. Journal of Child Custody, 6(3–4), 287–321. doi: 10.1080/15379410903084707
   Google Scholar
• Stephanie F. v George C., 270 P. 3d 737 (Ala. 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Straus, M. (n.d.). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. MenWeb Online Journal, ISSN: 1095–5240, http://www.batteredmen.com/straus21.htm, last visited 7/3/12
   Google Scholar
• Straus, M. A. (2009). Why the overwhelming evidence on partner physical violence has not been perceived and is often denied. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18, 552–571. doi: 10.1080/10926770903103081
   Google Scholar
• Swan, S. C. & Snow, D. L. (2002). A typology of women's use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(3), 286–319. doi: 10.1177/107780120200800302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuerkheimer, D. (2004). Recognizing and remedying the harm of battering: A call to criminalize domestic violence. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 94, 959–1032. doi: 10.2307/3491414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ver Steegh, N. (2005). Differentiating types of domestic violence: Implications for child custody. Louisiana Law Review, 65, 1379.
   Google Scholar
• Ver Steegh, N. & Dalton, C. (2008). Report from the wingspread conference on domestic violence and family courts. Family Court Review, 46, 454–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00214.x
   Google Scholar
• Waits, K. (1998). Battered women and their children: Lessons from one woman's story. Houston Law Review, 35, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman, S. (2000). Not to people like US: Hidden abuse in upscale marriages. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zibell, R. A. (2005). Common couple aggression: Frequency and implications for child custody and access evaluations. Family Court Review, 43(3), 454–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00046.x
   Google Scholar
• Zorza, J. (2011). The new domestic violence typologies: An accurate reconceptualization or another trivialization? Family & Intimate Violence Quarterly, 3, 225–136.
   Google Scholar