Testing in child custody evaluations: An overview of issues and uses

References

• Abidin, R. R. (2012). Parenting stress index (4th ed.). Lutz, FL: PAR.
   Google Scholar
• Abidin, R. R., & Abidin, R. R. (1990). Parenting Stress Index (PSI). Charlottesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abidin, R. R., Austin, W. G., & Flens, J. R. (2013). The forensic uses and limitations of the Parenting Stress Index. In R. P. Archer & E. M. Wheeler (Eds.), Forensic uses of clinical assessment instruments (pp. 346–379). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: Dept. of Psychiatry. University of Vermont.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, M. J. (1992). Ackerman-Schoendorf Scales for Parent Evaluation of Custody (ASPECT). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, M. J., & Ackerman, M. C. (1996). Child custody evaluation practices: A 1996 survey of psychologists. Family Law Quarterly, 30(3), 565–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, M. J., & Ackerman, M. C. (1997). Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(2), 137–145. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.28.2.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, M. J., & Pritzl, T. B. (2011). Child custody evaluation practices: A 20-year follow-up. Family Court Review, 49(3), 618–628. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01397.x
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association (APA). (2009). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/child-custody.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ames, L. B., Learned, J., Métraux, R. W., & Walker, R. N. (1952). Child Rorschach responses: Developmental trends from two to ten years. New York, NY: Paul B. Hoeber.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, E. J., & Bene, E. (1957). A technique for the objective assessment of the child’s family relations. Journal of Mental Science, 103, 541–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, E. M., Hagan, L. D., Mason, J., Handel, R., & Archer, R. P. (2012). MMPI-2-RF characteristics of custody evaluation litigants. Assessment, 19(1), 14–20. doi:10.1177/107319111039746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, R. P., Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2016). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent-Restructured Form (MMPI-A-RF): Administration, scoring, interpretation, and technical manual. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC). (2006). Model standards of practice for child custody evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.afccnet.org/Portals/0/ModelStdsChildCustodyEvalSept2006.pdf?ver=2013-08-21-071826-000
   Google Scholar
• Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC). (2016). Guidelines for examining intimate partner violence: A supplement to the AFCC model standards of practice for child custody evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.afccnet.org/Portals/0/Center%20for%20Excellance/Guidelines%20for%20Examining%20Intimate%20Partner%20Violence.pdf?ver=2016-05-16–183725-603
   Google Scholar
• Bagby, R. M., Nicholson, R. A., Buis, T., Radovanovic, H., & Fidler, B. J. (1999). Defensive responding on the MMPI-2in family custody and access evaluations. Psychological Assessment, 11(1), 24–28. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.11.1.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathurst, K., Gottfried, A. W., & Gottfried, A. E. (1997). Normative data for the MMPI-2in child custody litigation. Psychological Assessment, 9(3), 205–211. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.9.3.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battered Women’s Justice Project. (2015). Practice guides for family court decision-making in domestic abuse-related child custody matters. Retrieved from http://www.bwjp.org/assets/documents/pdfs/practice-guides-for-family-court-decision-making-ind.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beck, C. A., & Raghavan, C. (2010). Intimate partner abuse screening in custody mediation: The importance of assessing coercive control. Family Court Review, 48(3), 555–565. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01329.x
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form) manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bow, J. N., & Quinnell, F. A. (2002). A critical review of child custody evaluation reports. Family Court Review, 40(2), 164–176.
   Google Scholar
• Bow, J. N., & Boxer, P. (2003). Assessing allegations of domestic violence in child custody evaluations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(12), 1394–1410. doi:10.1177/0886260503258031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bow, J. N., Flens, J. R., Gould, J. W., & Greenhut, D. (2006). An analysis of administration, scoring, and interpretation of the MMPI-2 and MCMI-II/III in child custody evaluations. Journal of Child Custody: Research, Issues, and Practices, 2(4), 1–22. doi:10.1300/J190v02n04_01
   Google Scholar
• Bow, J. N., Gould, J. W., Flens, J. R., & Greenhut, D. (2006). Testing in child custody evaluations-selection, usage, and Daubert admissibility: A survey of psychologists. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 6(2), 17–38. doi:10.1300/J158v06n02_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricklin, B. (1990a). Bricklin Perceptual Scales manual. Furlong, PA: Village Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bricklin, B. (1990b). Parent awareness of skills survey manual. Furlong, PA: Village Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bricklin, B. (1993). Tests manuals supplement #9. Furlong, PA: Village Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (1991). Parent perception of child profile. Furlong, PA: Village Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. B., Lent, B., Brett, P. J., Sas, G., & Pederson, L. L. (1996). Development of the woman abuse screening tool for use in family practice. Family Medicine, 28, 422–428.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (rev. ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., Williams, C. L., Graham, J. R., Archer, R. P., Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y., & Kaemmer, B. (1992). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory—Adolescent (MMPI-A): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. G., O’Connor, T. G., Marvin, R. S., & Whelan, W. F. (2005). Practitioner review: The contribution of attachment theory to child custody assessments. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(2), 115–127. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00396.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., & Smith, P. H. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 260–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, A. L., Pope, B. O., Smith, P. H., & Hussey, J. R. (2001). Assessment of clinical partner violence screening tools. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association. Winter, 56(1), 19–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conners, C. K. (2001). Conners’ rating scales revised. Multi-Health Systems. North Tonawanda, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Daubert, V. (1993). Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, R. D., & Beck, C. J. A. (2016). Using couple-level patterns of intimate partner violence and abuse to predict divorce outcomes. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 23(1), 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, F. J. (1997). Application of the Millon inventories in forensic psychology. In T. Millon & T. Millon (Eds.), The Millon inventories: Clinical and personality assessment (pp. 124–139). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Cruise, K. R., & Buffington-Vollum, J. K. (2001). Forensic and correctional applications of the personality assessment inventory. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19(4), 519–543. doi:10.1002/bsl.457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrensaft, M. K., & Vivian, D. (1999). Is partner aggression related to appraisals of coercive control by a partner? Journal of Family Violence, 14(3), 251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery, R. E., Otto, R. K., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2005). A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: Limited science and a flawed system. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(1), 1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00020.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erard, R. E., & Viglione, D. J. (2014). The Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) in child custody evaluations. Journal of Child Custody: Research, Issues, and Practices, 11(3), 159–180. doi:10.1080/15379418.2014.943449
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, N. S. (2005). Use of the MMPI-2 in child custody evaluations involving battered women: What does psychological research tell us? Family Law Quarterly, 39(1), 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, S. K., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Vitacco, M. J. (2007). A critical examination of the suitability and limitations of psychological tests in family court. Family Court Review, 45(2), 157–174. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00136.x
   Google Scholar
• Exner, J. E. (1995). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Exner, J. E., & Weiner, I. B. (1995). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive system: Vol. 3. Assessment of children and adolescents (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gerard, A. B. (1994). Parent–child relationship inventory. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, M. L. (2016). Interviewing children and adolescents in child custody cases. In M. L. Goldstein & M. L. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of child custody (pp. 41–48). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13942-5_5
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. (2005). Use of psychological tests in child custody assessment. Journal of Child Custody: Research, Issues, and Practices, 2(1–2), 49–69. doi:10.1300/J190v02n01_04
   Google Scholar
• Halon, R. L. (2001). The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III: The normal quartet in child custody cases. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19(1), 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hamby, S. (2017). A scientific answer to a scientific question: The gender debate on intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 145–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamby, S. (2014). Intimate partner and sexual violence research: Scientific progress, scientific challenges and gender. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 149–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardesty, J. L., Hans, J. D., Haselschwerdt, M. L., Khaw, L., & Crossman, K. A. (2015). The influence of divorcing mothers’ demeanor on custody evaluators’ assessment of their domestic violence allegations. Journal of Child Custody, 12(1), 47–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze, M. C., & Grisso, T. (1996). Review of instruments assessing parenting competencies used in child custody evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 14(3), 293–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, N. Z., & Harris, G. T. (2008). How nonrecidivism affects predictive accuracy: Evidence from a cross-validation of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(2), 326–337. doi:10.1177/0886260508316478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Beck, C. J. A., & Applegate, A. G. (2010). The Mediator’s Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns (MASIC): A screening interview for intimate partner violence and abuse available in the public domain. Family Court Review, 48, 646–662. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.001339.x
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, W. W. (1991). Partner Abuse Scale: Physical. Tempe, AZ: Walmyr.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. R., Roseby, V., & Kuehnle, K. (2009). In the name of the child: A developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hynan, D. J. (2013). Use of the Personality Assessment Inventory in child custody evaluation. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 5, 120–133.
   Google Scholar
• Hynan, D. J. (2014). Child custody evaluation: New theoretical applications and research. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Keilin, W. G., & Bloom, L. J. (1986). Child custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17(4), 338–346. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.17.4.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropp, P. R. (2009). Intimate partner violence risk assessment. In J. L. Ireland, C. Ireland & P. Birch (Eds.), Violent and sexual offenders: Assessment, treatment and management (pp. 43–67). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Marschak, M. (1960). A method for evaluating child–parent interaction under controlled conditions. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 97(1), 973–922. doi:10.1080/00221325.1960.10534309
   Google Scholar
• McCann, J. T., Flens, J. R., Campagna, V., Collman, P., Lazzaro, T., & Connor, E. (2001). The MCMI-III in child custody evaluations: A normative study. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1(2), 27–44. doi:10.1300/J158v01n02_02
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. J., Viglione, D. J., Mihura, J. L., Erard, R. E., & Erdberg, P. (2011). Rorschach performance assessment system: Administrative, coding, interpretation and technical manual. Toledo, OH: Rorschach Performance Assessment System.
   Google Scholar
• Millon, T., Millon, C., & Davis, R. (1994). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, J. S. (1986). The child abuse potential inventory: Manual (2nd ed.). Webster, NC: Psytec.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual (2nd ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Morrill, A. C., Dai, J., Dunn, S., Sung, I., & Smith, K. (2005). Child custody and visitation decisions when the father has perpetrated violence against the mother. Violence Against Women, 11(8), 1076–1107. doi:10.1177/1077801205278046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, H. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, T. S., & Grisso, T. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry: An international snapshot. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(12), 1406–1421. doi:10.1177/0093854814548449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyskiw, J. E. (2003). Domestic violence and children’s adjustment: A review of research. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 3(1–2), 11–45.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., & Barcus, E. H. (2000). The use of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 38(3), 312–340. doi:10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00578.x
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, A. (2001). The Bene-Anthony Family Relations Test revisited: Directions in the assessment of children’s perceptions of family relations. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 74(3), 323–349. doi:10.1348/000711201161019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennuto, T. O., & Archer, R. P. (2008). MMPI-A forensic case studies: Uses in documented court decisions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(3), 215–226. doi:10.1080/00223890701884897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrotti, M. J. (2016). A methodology primer for conducting bonding studies in child custody evaluations: Integration with neuroscience. In M. L. Goldstein (Ed.), Handbook of child custody (pp. 255–272). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Quinnell, F. A., & Bow, J. N. (2001). Psychological tests used in child custody evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19(4), 491–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). BASC-2: Behavior assessment system for children (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
   Google Scholar
• Saini, M., & Polak, S. (2014). The ecological validity of parent-child observations: A review of empirical evidence related to custody evaluations. Journal of Child Custody: Research, Issues, and Practices, 11(3), 181–201. doi:10.1080/15379418.2014.953661
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. G. (2015). Research based recommendations for child custody evaluation practices and policies in cases of intimate partner violence. Journal of Child Custody: Research, Issues, and Practices, 12(1), 71–92. doi:10.1080/15379418.2015.1037052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. G., Faller, K. C., & Tolman, R. M. (2011). Child custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic abuse allegations: Their relationship to evaluator demographics, background, domestic violence knowledge, and custody visitation recommendations. Final technical report to the National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/238891.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, K. M., Sinacore, J. M., Li, X. Q., Zitter, R. E., & Shakil, A. (1998). HITS: A short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. Family Medicine, 30, 508–512.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegel, J. C., Bow, J. N., & Gottlieb, M. C. (2012). The MMPI-2in high conflict child custody cases. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 30(3), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. H., Earp, J. A., & DeVellis, R. (1995). Measuring battering: Development of the Women’s Experience with Battering (WEB) scale. Women’s health (Hillsdale, NJ), 1(4), 273–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stahl, P. M. (2011). Conducting child custody evaluations: From basic to complex issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, A. M., Lund, M. E., & Garcia, J. A. (2010). Assessing children’s perceptions of family relationships: An interactive instrument for use in custody disputes. J. Child Custody, 7, 192–216. doi:10.1080/15379418.2010.512236
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, J. R. (2014). A child normative and developmental validation study with the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest.
   Google Scholar
• Tanha, M., Beck, C. J. A., Raghavan, C., & Figueredo, A. J. (2010). Coercive control as a motivational factor for intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(10), 1836–1854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen, D. (1991). Clinical assessment of object relations using the TAT. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 56–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstok, Z. (2015). Critical review of Hamby’s (2014) article titled “Intimate partner and sexual violence research, scientific progress, scientific challenges, and gender”. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 134–144, Published online before print July 28, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yañez, Y. T., & Fremouw, W. (2004). The application of the Daubert standard to parental capacity measures. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 22(3), 5–28.
   Google Scholar