A mathematical model for predicting the spatiotemporal response of breast cancer cells treated with doxorubicin

References

• Holohan C, Van Schaeybroeck S, Longley D, Johnston P. Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(10):714–16. doi:10.1038/nrc3599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng HC. The molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance in cancers. Oncotarget. 2017;8(35):59950–59964. PMID: 28938696; PMCID: PMC5601792. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.19048.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dagogo-Jack I, Shaw A. Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(2):81–94. London. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easwaran H, Tsai H, Baylin S. Cancer epigenetics: Tumor heterogeneity, plasticity of stem-like states, and drug resistance. Mol Cell. 2014;54(5):716–727. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong H, Wang W, Mo S, Chen R, Zou K, Han J, Zhang F, Hu J. RETRACTED ARTICLE: SP1-induced lncRNA AGAP2-AS1 expression promotes chemoresistance of breast cancer by epigenetic regulation of MyD88. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):202–215. doi:10.1186/s13046-018-0875-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji X, Lu Y, Tian H, Meng X, Wei M, Cho W. Chemoresistance mechanisms of breast cancer and their countermeasures. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019. 114:108800. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyak K. Heterogeneity in breast cancer. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(10):3786–3788. doi:10.1172/JCI60534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alizadeh A, Aranda V, Bardelli A, Blanpain C, Bock C, Borowski C, Caldas C, Califano A, Doherty M, Elsner M, et al. Toward understanding and exploiting tumor heterogeneity. Nat Med. 2015;21(8):846–853. doi:10.1038/nm.3915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun XX, Yu Q. Intra-tumor heterogeneity of cancer cells and its implications for cancer treatment. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2015;36(10):1219–1227. doi:10.1038/aps.2015.92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatenby RA, Grove O, Gillies RJ. Quantitative imaging in cancer evolution and ecology. Radiology. 2013;269(1):8–14. doi:10.1148/radiol.13122697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed A, Whisenant J, Barnes S, Sorace A, Yankeelov T. Multiparametric analysis of longitudinal quantitative mri data to identify distinct tumor habitats in preclinical models of breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(6):1–20. doi:10.3390/cancers12061682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazerouni A, Hormuth D 2nd, Davis T, Bloom M, Mounho S, Rahman G, Virostko J, Yankeelov T, Sorace A Quantifying tumor heterogeneity via MRI habitats to characterize microenvironmental alterations in HER2+ breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14, 1837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022;12(1):31–46. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett A, Faghihi D, Hormuth D 2nd, Lima E, Virostko J, Biros G, Patt D, Yankeelov T. Optimal control theory for personalized therapeutic regimens in oncology: background, history, challenges, and opportunities. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1314. PMID: 32370195; PMCID: PMC7290915. doi:10.3390/jcm9051314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yankeelov T, Atuegwu N, Hormuth D 2nd, Weis J, Barnes S, Miga M, Rericha E, Quaranta V. Clinically relevant modeling of tumor growth and treatment response. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(187):187ps9. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson A, Quaranta V. Integrative mathematical oncology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(3):227–234. doi:10.1038/nrc2329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffari Laleh N, Loeffler C, Grajek J, Stankova K, Pearson A, Muti H, Trautwein C, Enderling H, Poleszczuk J, Kather J, et al. Classical mathematical models for prediction of response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022;18(2):e1009822. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang E, Howard G, Brock A, Yankeelov T, Lorenzo G. Mathematical characterization of population dynamics in breast cancer cells treated with doxorubicin. Front Mol Biosci. 2022. 9:972146. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.972146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Hormuth D 2nd, Davis T, Yang J, McKenna M, Jarrett A, Enderling H, Brock A, Yankeelov T. A time-resolved experimental–mathematical model for predicting the response of glioma cells to single-dose radiation therapy. Integr Biol. 2021;202113(7):167–183. (Camb) PMID: 34060613; PMCID: PMC8271006. doi:10.1093/intbio/zyab010.
   Google Scholar
• Yang J, Virostko J, Hormuth D 2nd, Liu J, Brock A, Kowalski J, Yankeelov T, Carlier A. An experimental-mathematical approach to predict tumor cell growth as a function of glucose availability in breast cancer cell lines. PloS One. 2021;16(7):e0240765. PMID: 34255770; PMCID: PMC8277046. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzi G, Grammatica B, Chaabane L, Catucci M, Mondino A, Zunino P, Ciarletta P. T cell therapy against cancer: a predictive diffuse-interface mathematical model informed by pre-clinical studies. J Theor Biol. 2022;547:111172. ISSN 0022-5193. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo M, Nikolopoulou E, Gevertz J. 2022. From fitting the average to fitting the individual: a cautionary tale for mathematical modelers. Front Oncol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.793908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hormuth D 2nd, Weis J, Barnes S, Miga M, Rericha E, Quaranta V, Yankeelov T. A mechanically coupled reaction–diffusion model that incorporates intra-tumoural heterogeneity to predict in vivo glioma growth. J R Soc Interface. 2017;14(128):142016101020161010. doi:10.1098/rsif.2016.1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Jarrett A, Zhou Z, Elshafeey N, Adrada B, Candelaria R, Mohamed R, Boge M, Huo L, White J, et al. MRI-Based digital models forecast patient-specific treatment responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2022; 82(18):3394–3404. PMID: 35914239; PMCID: PMC9481712. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hormuth D 2nd, Al Feghali K, Elliott A, Yankeelov T, Chung C. Image-based personalization of computational models for predicting response of high-grade glioma to chemoradiation. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8520. PMID: 33875739; PMCID: PMC8055874. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87887-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockne R, Trister A, Jacobs J, Hawkins-Daarud A, Neal M, Hendrickson K, Mrugala M, Rockhill J, Kinahan P, Krohn K, et al. A patient-specific computational model of hypoxia-modulated radiation resistance in glioblastoma using (18)F-FMISO-PET. J R Soc Interface. 2015;12(103):20141174. doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogea C, Davatzikos C, Biros G. An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction-diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects. J Math Biol. 2008;56(6):793–825. doi:10.1007/s00285-007-0139-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clatz O, Sermesant M, Bondiau P-Y, Delingette H, Warfield S, Malandain G, Ayache N. Realistic simulation of the 3-D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005;1(10):1334–1346. doi:10.1109/TMI.2005.857217.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor J, Rose C, Waterton J, Carano R, Parker G, Jackson A. Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: Role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:249–257. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Hawkins-Daarud A, Wang L, Li J, Swanson K. Imaging of intratumoral heterogeneity in high-grade glioma. Cancer Lett.2020;477:97–106. PMID: 32112907; PMCID: PMC7108976. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2020.02.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavkova K, Patel S, Cacini Z, Kazerouni A, Gardner A, Yankeelov T, Hormuth DA. Hormuth 2nd D. Mathematical modelling of the dynamics of image-informed tumor habitats in a murine model of glioma. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):2916. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-30010-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang J, Cunningham J, Brown J, Gatenby R Integrating evolutionary dynamics into treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Nat Commun. 2017; 8, 1816. 10.1038/s41467-017-01968-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady-Nicholls R, Enderling H. Range-bounded adaptive therapy in metastatic prostate cancer. Cancers. 2022;14(21):5319. doi:10.3390/cancers14215319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady-Nicholls R, Zhang J, Zhang T, Wanh A, Butler R, Gatenby R, Enderling H. Predicting patient-specific response to adaptive therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen dynamics. Neoplasia. 2021;23(9):851–858. doi:10.1016/j.neo.2021.06.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazerouni A, Gadde M, Gardner A, Hormuth D 2nd, Jarrett A, Johnsn K, Lina E, Lorenzo G, Philips C, Brock A, et al. Integrating quantitative assays with biologically based mathematical modeling for predictive oncology. iScience. 2020;23(12):101807. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna M, Weis J, Quaranta V, Yankeelov T. Variable cell line pharmacokinetics contribute to non-linear treatment response in heterogeneous cell populations. Ann Biomed Eng. 2018;46(6):899–911. doi:10.1007/s10439-018-2001-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson D, Garbett S, Frick P, Quaranta V. Fractional proliferation: a method to deconvolve cell population dynamics from single-cell data. Nat Methods. 2012;9(9):923. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima E, Ghousifam N, Ozkan A, Oden J, Shahmoradi A, Rylander M, Wohlmuth B, Yankeelov T. Calibration of multi-parameter models of avascular tumor growth using time resolved microscopy data. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14558. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32347-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howard G, Jost T, Yankeelov T, Brock A, Finley S. Quantification of long-term doxorubicin response dynamics in breast cancer cell lines to direct treatment schedules. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022;18(3):e1009104. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Hormuth D 2nd, Yang J, Yankeelov T. A data assimilation framework to predict the response of glioma cells to radiation. Math Biosci Eng. 2023;20(1):318–336. doi:10.3934/mbe.2023015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Hormuth D 2nd, Lorenzo G, Jarrett A, Pineda F, Howard F, Karczmar G, Yankeelov T. Towards patient-specific optimization of neoadjuvant treatment protocols for breast cancer based on image-guided fluid dynamics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022;69(11):3334–3344. doi:10.1109/TBME.2022.3168402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett A, Hormuth D 2nd, Wu C, Kazerouni A, Ekrut D, Virostko J, Sorace A, DiCarlo J, Kowalski J, Patt D, et al. Evaluating patient-specific neoadjuvant regimens for breast cancer via a mathematical model constrained by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging data. Neoplasia. 2020;12(12):820–830. doi:10.1016/j.neo.2020.10.011.
   Google Scholar
• Lima E, Wyde R, Sorace A, Yankeelov T. Optimizing combination therapy in a murine model of HER2+ breast cancer. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2022. 402:115484. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowarz E, Löscher D, Marschalek R. Optimized sleeping beauty transposons rapidly generate stable transgenic cell lines. Biotechnol J. 2015;10(4):647–653. doi:10.1002/biot.201400821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mátés L, Chuah M, Belay E, Jerchow B, Manoj N, Acosta-Sanchez A, Grzela D, Schmitt A, Becker K, Matrai J, et al. Molecular evolution of a novel hyperactive sleeping beauty transposase enables robust stable gene transfer in vertebrates. Nat Genet. 2009;41(6):753–761. doi:10.1038/ng.343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett A, Lima E, Hormuth D 2nd, McKenna M, Feng X, Ekrut D, Resende A, Brock A, Yankeelov T. Mathematical models of tumor cell proliferation: a review of the literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(12):1271–1286. doi:10.1080/14737140.2018.1527689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gewirtz D. A critical evaluation of the mechanisms of action proposed for the antitumor effects of the anthracycline antibiotics adriamycin and daunorubicin. Biochem Pharmacol. 1999;57(7):727–741. doi:10.1016/s0006-2952(98)00307-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho C, Santos R, Cardoso S, Correia S, Oliveira P, Santos M, Moreira PD. Doxorubicin: the good, the bad and the ugly effect. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(25):3267–3285. doi:10.2174/092986709788803312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna M, Weis J, Barnes S, Tyson D, Miga M, Quaranta V, Yankeelov T. A predictive mathematical modeling approach for the study of doxorubicin treatment in triple negative breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5725. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05902-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin L. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45(1):255–268. JSTOR. doi:10.2307/2532051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostelich E, Kuang Y, McDaniel J, Moore N, Martirosyan N, Preul M. Accurate state estimation from uncertain data and models: an application of data assimilation to mathematical models of human brain tumors. Biol Direct. 2011;6(1):64. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-6-64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson K, Howard G, Morgan D, Brenner E, Gardner A, Durrett R, Mo W, Al-Khafaji A, Sontag E, Jarret A, et al. Integrating transcriptomics and bulk time course data into a mathematical framework to describe and predict therapeutic resistance in cancer. Phys Biol. 2020;18(1):016001. doi:10.1088/1478-3975/abb09c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hormuth D 2nd, Philips C, Wu C, Lima E, Lorenzo G, Jha P, Jarrett A, Oden J, Yankeelov T. Biologically-based mathematical modeling of tumor vasculature and angiogenesis via time-resolved imaging data. Cancers. 2021;13(12, Art. no. 12):3008. doi:10.3390/cancers13123008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon I. Data assimilation for numerical weather prediction: a review. In: Park SK Xu L, editors. Data assimilation for atmospheric, oceanic and hydrologic applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. pp. 21–65. 10.1007/978-3-540-71056-1_2
   Google Scholar
• Zahid M, Mohsin N, Mohamed A, Caudell J, Harrison L, Fuller C, Moros E, Enderling H. Forecasting individual patient response to radiation therapy in head and neck cancer with a dynamic carrying capacity model. Int J Radiat Oncol Bio Phys. 2021;111(3):693–704. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahid M, Mohamed A, Caudell J, Harrison L, Fuller C, Moros E, Enderling H. Dynamics-Adapted Radiotherapy Dose (DARD) for head and neck cancer radiotherapy dose personalization. J Pers Med. 2021;11(11):1124. doi:10.3390/jpm11111124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu C, He S, Lee Y, HE Y, Kong E, Li H, Anastasio M, Popesco G. Live-dead assay on unlabeled cells using phase imaging with computational specificity. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):713. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28214-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez C, Al’khafaji A, Brenner E, Johnson K, Gohil S, Lin Z, Knisbacher B, Durrett R, Li S, Parvin S, et al. Multifunctional barcoding with ClonMapper enables high-resolution study of clonal dynamics during tumor evolution and treatment. Nat Cancer. 2021;2(7):758–772. doi:10.1038/s43018-021-00222-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hormuth D 2nd, Farhat M, Bronk J, Langshaw H, Yankeelov T. Effect of chemoradiation on high-grade gliomas can be forecasted by mid-treatment images via image-driven mathematical modeling. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2023;31:0136.
   Google Scholar
• Moffat B, Chenevert T, Meyer C, Mckeever P, Hall D, Hoff B, Johnson T, Rehemtulla A, Ross B. The functional diffusion map: an imaging biomarker for the early prediction of cancer treatment outcome. Neoplasia. 2006;8(4):259–267. doi:10.1593/neo.05844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar