1,603
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Poly-SUMO-2/3 chain modification of Nuf2 facilitates CENP-E kinetochore localization and chromosome congression during mitosis

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 855-873 | Received 14 Oct 2018, Accepted 17 Mar 2021, Published online: 28 Apr 2021

References

  • Abrieu A, Liakopoulos D. How does SUMO participate in spindle organization? Cells. 2019;8:801.
  • Dasso M. Emerging roles of the SUMO pathway in mitosis. Cell Div. 2008;3:5.
  • Wan J, Subramonian D, Zhang XD. SUMOylation in control of accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2012;13:467–481.
  • Wang Y, Dasso M. SUMOylation and deSUMOylation at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:4249–4252.
  • Bernier-Villamor V, Sampson DA, Matunis MJ, et al. Structural basis for E2-mediated SUMO conjugation revealed by a complex between ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 and RanGAP1. Cell. 2002;108:345–356.
  • Rodriguez MS, Dargemont C, Hay RT. SUMO-1 conjugation in vivo requires both a consensus modification motif and nuclear targeting. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(16):12654–12659.
  • Sampson DA, Wang M, Matunis MJ. The small ubiquitin-like modifier-1 (SUMO-1) consensus sequence mediates Ubc9 binding and is essential for SUMO-1 modification. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(24):21664–21669.
  • Pedrioli PG, Raught B, Zhang XD, et al. Automated identification of SUMOylation sites using mass spectrometry and SUMmOn pattern recognition software. Nat Methods. 2006;3:533–539.
  • Tatham MH, Jaffray E, Vaughan OA, et al. Polymeric chains of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 are conjugated to protein substrates by SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:35368–35374.
  • Vertegaal AC. Small ubiquitin-related modifiers in chains. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35:1422–1423.
  • Matic I, Van Hagen M, Schimmel J, et al. In vivo identification of human small ubiquitin-like modifier polymerization sites by high accuracy mass spectrometry and an in vitro to in vivo strategy. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7:132–144.
  • Zhang XD, Goeres J, Zhang H, et al. SUMO-2/3 modification and binding regulate the association of CENP-E with kinetochores and progression through mitosis. Mol Cell. 2008;29:729–741.
  • Cheeseman IM. The kinetochore. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6:a015826.
  • Maiato H, DeLuca J, Salmon ED, et al. The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:5461–5477.
  • Abrieu A, Kahana JA, Wood KW, et al. CENP-E as an essential component of the mitotic checkpoint in vitro. Cell. 2000;102(6):817–826.
  • Azuma Y, Arnaoutov A, Dasso M. SUMO-2/3 regulates topoisomerase II in mitosis. J Cell Biol. 2003;163:477–487.
  • Ban R, Nishida T, Urano T. Mitotic kinase Aurora-B is regulated by SUMO-2/3 conjugation/deconjugation during mitosis. Genes Cells. 2011;16:652–669.
  • Li T, Chen L, Cheng J, et al. SUMOylated NKAP is essential for chromosome alignment by anchoring CENP-E to kinetochores. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):12969.
  • Mukhopadhyay D, Arnaoutov A, Dasso M. The SUMO protease SENP6 is essential for inner kinetochore assembly. J Cell Biol. 2010;188(5):681–692.
  • Restuccia A, Yang F, Chen C, et al. Mps1 is SUMO-modified during the cell cycle. Oncotarget. 2016;7(3):3158–3170.
  • Yang F, Hu L, Chen C, et al. BubR1 is modified by sumoylation during mitotic progression. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:4875–4882.
  • Agostinho M, Santos V, Ferreira F, et al. Conjugation of human topoisomerase 2 alpha with small ubiquitin-like modifiers 2/3 in response to topoisomerase inhibitors: cell cycle stage and chromosome domain specificity. Cancer Res. 2008;68:2409–2418.
  • Joseph J, Liu ST, Jablonski SA, et al. The RanGAP1-RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubule-kinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr Biol. 2004;14:611–617.
  • Seufert W, Futcher B, Jentsch S. Role of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in degradation of S- and M-phase cyclins. Nature. 1995;373(6509):78–81.
  • Cubenas-Potts C, Goeres JD, Matunis MJ. SENP1 and SENP2 affect spatial and temporal control of sumoylation in mitosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24:3483–3495.
  • Chan GK, Schaar BT, Yen TJ. Characterization of the kinetochore binding domain of CENP-E reveals interactions with the kinetochore proteins CENP-F and hBUBR1. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:49–63.
  • Cooke CA, Schaar B, Yen TJ, et al. Localization of CENP-E in the fibrous corona and outer plate of mammalian kinetochores from prometaphase through anaphase. Chromosoma. 1997;106(7):446–455.
  • Yen TJ, Compton DA, Wise D, et al. CENP-E, a novel human centromere-associated protein required for progression from metaphase to anaphase. Embo J. 1991;10:1245–1254.
  • Kapoor TM, Lampson MA, Hergert P, et al. Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science. 2006;311(5759):388–391.
  • Putkey FR, Cramer T, Morphew MK, et al. Unstable kinetochore-microtubule capture and chromosomal instability following deletion of CENP-E. Dev Cell. 2002;3(3):351–365.
  • Schaar BT, Chan GK, Maddox P, et al. CENP-E function at kinetochores is essential for chromosome alignment. J Cell Biol. 1997;139(6):1373–1382.
  • Wood KW, Sakowicz R, Goldstein LS, et al. CENP-E is a plus end-directed kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell. 1997;91:357–366.
  • Liu D, Ding X, Du J, et al. Human NUF2 interacts with centromere-associated protein E and is essential for a stable spindle microtubule-kinetochore attachment. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:21415–21424.
  • DeLuca JG, Moree B, Hickey JM, et al. hNuf2 inhibition blocks stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment and induces mitotic cell death in HeLa cells. J Cell Biol. 2002;159:549–555.
  • Hori T, Haraguchi T, Hiraoka Y, et al. Dynamic behavior of Nuf2-Hec1 complex that localizes to the centrosome and centromere and is essential for mitotic progression in vertebrate cells. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:3347–3362.
  • McCleland ML, Gardner RD, Kallio MJ, et al. The highly conserved Ndc80 complex is required for kinetochore assembly, chromosome congression, and spindle checkpoint activity. Genes Dev. 2003;17:101–114.
  • Jakobs A, Koehnke J, Himstedt F, et al. Ubc9 fusion-directed SUMOylation (UFDS): a method to analyze function of protein SUMOylation. Nat Methods. 2007;4:245–250.
  • Banerjee A, Deshaies RJ, Chau V. Characterization of a dominant negative mutant of the cell cycle ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Cdc34. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:26209–26215.
  • Mahajan R, Gerace L, Melchior F. Molecular characterization of the SUMO-1 modification of RanGAP1 and its role in nuclear envelope association. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:259–270.
  • Matunis MJ, Wu J, Blobel G. SUMO-1 modification and its role in targeting the Ran GTPase-activating protein, RanGAP1, to the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 1998;140(3):499–509.
  • Zhao Q, Xie Y, Zheng Y, et al. GPS-SUMO: a tool for the prediction of sumoylation sites and SUMO-interaction motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:W325–330.
  • Cox E, Hwang W, Uzoma I, et al. Global analysis of SUMO-binding proteins identifies SUMOylation as a key regulator of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2017;16:812–823.
  • Legal T, Hayward D, Gluszek-Kustusz A, et al. The C-terminal helix of BubR1 is essential for CENP-E-dependent chromosome alignment. J Cell Sci. 2020;133:jcs246025.
  • Mao Y, Abrieu A, Cleveland DW. Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/inactivation of BubR1. Cell. 2003;114:87–98.
  • Sun H, Hunter T. Poly-small ubiquitin-like modifier (PolySUMO)-binding proteins identified through a string search. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:42071–42083.
  • Tatham MH, Geoffroy MC, Shen L, et al. RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:538–546.
  • Eifler K, Cuijpers SAG, Willemstein E, et al. SUMO targets the APC/C to regulate transition from metaphase to anaphase. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1119.
  • Lee CC, Li B, Yu H, et al. Sumoylation promotes optimal APC/C activation and timely anaphase. Elife. 2018;7. DOI:10.7554/eLife.29539
  • Liebelt F, Jansen NS, Kumar S, et al. The poly-SUMO2/3 protease SENP6 enables assembly of the constitutive centromere-associated network by group deSUMOylation. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3987.
  • Yang F, Chen Y, Dai W. Sumoylation of Kif18A plays a role in regulating mitotic progression. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:197.
  • Huang Y, Yao Y, Xu HZ, et al. Defects in chromosome congression and mitotic progression in KIF18A-deficient cells are partly mediated through impaired functions of CENP-E. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:2643–2649.
  • Psakhye I, Jentsch S. Protein group modification and synergy in the SUMO pathway as exemplified in DNA repair. Cell. 2012;151(4):807–820.
  • Azuma Y, Arnaoutov A, Anan T, et al. PIASy mediates SUMO-2 conjugation of Topoisomerase-II on mitotic chromosomes. Embo J. 2005;24:2172–2182.
  • Diaz-Martinez LA, Gimenez-Abian JF, Azuma Y, et al. PIASgamma is required for faithful chromosome segregation in human cells. PLoS One. 2006;1:e53.
  • Klein UR, Haindl M, Nigg EA, et al. RanBP2 and SENP3 function in a mitotic SUMO2/3 conjugation-deconjugation cycle on Borealin. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(1):410–418.
  • Flotho A, Melchior F. Sumoylation: a regulatory protein modification in health and disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2013;82(1):357–385.
  • Geoffroy MC, Hay RT. An additional role for SUMO in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:564–568.
  • Cuijpers SAG, Willemstein E, Vertegaal ACO. Converging small Ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) and Ubiquitin signaling: improved methodology identifies co-modified target proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2017;16:2281–2295.
  • Hendriks IA, Lyon D, Young C, et al. Site-specific mapping of the human SUMO proteome reveals co-modification with phosphorylation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017;24:325–336.
  • Erker Y, Neyret-Kahn H, Seeler JS, et al. Arkadia, a novel SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase involved in PML degradation. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:2163–2177.
  • Geoffroy MC, Jaffray EG, Walker KJ, et al. Arsenic-induced SUMO-dependent recruitment of RNF4 into PML nuclear bodies. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21:4227–4239.
  • Lallemand-Breitenbach V, Jeanne M, Benhenda S, et al. Arsenic degrades PML or PML-RARalpha through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:547–555.
  • Zhang XW, Yan XJ, Zhou ZR, et al. Arsenic trioxide controls the fate of the PML-RARalpha oncoprotein by directly binding PML. Science. 2010;328:240–243.
  • He X, Riceberg J, Pulukuri SM, et al. Characterization of the loss of SUMO pathway function on cancer cells and tumor proliferation. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123882.
  • Kessler JD, Kahle KT, Sun T, et al. A SUMOylation-dependent transcriptional subprogram is required for Myc-driven tumorigenesis. Science. 2012;335(6066):348–353.
  • Luo J, Emanuele MJ, Li D, et al. A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies multiple synthetic lethal interactions with the Ras oncogene. Cell. 2009;137:835–848.
  • Eifler K, Vertegaal ACO. SUMOylation-mediated regulation of cell cycle progression and cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015;40:779–793.
  • Seeler JS, Dejean A. SUMO and the robustness of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:184–197.
  • Subramonian D, Raghunayakula S, Olsen JV, et al. Analysis of changes in SUMO-2/3 modification during breast cancer progression and metastasis. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:3905–3918.
  • Fukuda I, Ito A, Hirai G, et al. Ginkgolic acid inhibits protein SUMOylation by blocking formation of the E1-SUMO intermediate. Chem Biol. 2009;16:133–140.
  • He X, Riceberg J, Soucy T, et al. Probing the roles of SUMOylation in cancer cell biology by using a selective SAE inhibitor. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:1164–1171.
  • Hirohama M, Kumar A, Fukuda I, et al. Spectomycin B1 as a novel SUMOylation inhibitor that directly binds to SUMO E2. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8:2635–2642.
  • Kim YS, Nagy K, Keyser S, et al. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay identifies a mechanistically unique inhibitor of protein sumoylation. Chem Biol. 2013;20(4):604–613.
  • Li YJ, Du L, Wang J, et al. Allosteric inhibition of Ubiquitin-like modifications by a class of inhibitor of SUMO-activating enzyme. Cell Chem Biol. 2019;26(278–288):e276.
  • Licciardello MP, Mullner MK, Durnberger G, et al. NOTCH1 activation in breast cancer confers sensitivity to inhibition of SUMOylation. Oncogene. 2015;34:3780–3790.
  • Lv Z, Yuan L, Atkison JH, et al. Molecular mechanism of a covalent allosteric inhibitor of SUMO E1 activating enzyme. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5145.
  • Agarwal R, Narayan J, Bhattacharyya A, et al. Gene expression profiling, pathway analysis and subtype classification reveal molecular heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinoma and suggest subtype specific therapeutic targets. Cancer Genet. 2017;216-217:37–51.
  • Hayama S, Daigo Y, Kato T, et al. Activation of CDCA1-KNTC2, members of centromere protein complex, involved in pulmonary carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2006;66(21):10339–10348.
  • Hu P, Chen X, Sun J, et al. siRNA-mediated knockdown against NUF2 suppresses pancreatic cancer proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Biosci Rep. 2015;35(35). DOI:10.1042/BSR20140124
  • Huang SK, Qian JX, Yuan BQ, et al. SiRNA-mediated knockdown against NUF2 suppresses tumor growth and induces cell apoptosis in human glioma cells. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2014;60:30–36.
  • Shiraishi T, Terada N, Zeng Y, et al. Cancer/Testis Antigens as potential predictors of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. J Transl Med. 2011;9:153.
  • Sun ZY, Wang W, Gao H, et al. Potential therapeutic targets of the nuclear division cycle 80 (NDC80) complexes genes in lung adenocarcinoma. J Cancer. 2020;11:2921–2934.
  • Xu W, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. Screening of differentially expressed genes and identification of NUF2 as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. Int J Mol Med. 2019;44:390–404.
  • Kaneko N, Miura K, Gu Z, et al. siRNA-mediated knockdown against CDCA1 and KNTC2, both frequently overexpressed in colorectal and gastric cancers, suppresses cell proliferation and induces apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;390:1235–1240.
  • Liu Q, Dai SJ, Li H, et al. Silencing of NUF2 inhibits tumor growth and induces apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:8623–8629.
  • Matunis MJ, Coutavas E, Blobel G. A novel ubiquitin-like modification modulates the partitioning of the Ran-GTPase-activating protein RanGAP1 between the cytosol and the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 1996;135:1457–1470.
  • Sekhri P, Tao T, Kaplan F, et al. Characterization of amino acid residues within the N-terminal region of Ubc9 that play a role in Ubc9 nuclear localization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;458:128–133.
  • Jordan M, Schallhorn A, Wurm FM. Transfecting mammalian cells: optimization of critical parameters affecting calcium-phosphate precipitate formation. Nucleic Acids Res 1996;24: 596–601

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.