Improving porcine SCNT efficiency by selecting donor cells size

References

• Wang X, Qu J, Li J, et al. Epigenetic reprogramming during somatic cell nuclear transfer: recent progress and future directions. Front Genet. 2020;11:205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hryhorowicz M, Lipiński D, Hryhorowicz S, et al. Application of genetically engineered pigs in biomedical research. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(6):670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matoba S, Zhang Y. Somatic cell nuclear transfer reprogramming: mechanisms and applications. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(4):471–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmut I, Bai Y, Taylor J. Somatic cell nuclear transfer: origins, the present position and future opportunities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1680):20140366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth KM, Prather RS. Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: how can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming? Mol Reprod Dev. 2010;77(12):1001–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cibelli JB, Campbell KH, Seidel GE, et al. The health profile of cloned animals. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(1):13–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Liu X, Wang C, et al. Identification of key factors conquering developmental arrest of somatic cell cloned embryos by combining embryo biopsy and single-cell sequencing. Cell Discov. 2016;2:16010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matoba S, Liu Y, Lu F, et al. Embryonic development following somatic cell nuclear transfer impeded by persisting histone methylation. Cell. 2014;159(4):884–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hormanseder E, Simeone A, Allen GE, et al. H3K4 methylation-dependent memory of somatic cell identity inhibits reprogramming and development of nuclear transfer embryos. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21(1):135–143.e136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matoba S, Wang H, Jiang L, et al. Loss of H3K27me3 imprinting in somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos disrupts post-implantation development. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(3):343–354.e345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iager AE, Ragina NP, Ross PJ, et al. Trichostatin A improves histone acetylation in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer early embryos. Cloning Stem Cells. 2008;10(3):371–379.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou C, Wang Y, Zhang J, et al. H3K27me3 is an epigenetic barrier while KDM6A overexpression improves nuclear reprogramming efficiency. Faseb J. 2019;33(3):4638–4652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Shi J, Liu D, et al. Effects of donor fibroblast cell type and transferred cloned embryo number on the efficiency of pig cloning. Cell Reprogram. 2013;15(1):35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Lee Y, Lee GS, et al. Comparative study of the developmental competence of cloned pig embryos derived from spermatogonial stem cells and fetal fibroblasts. Reprod Domest Anim. 2019;54(9):1258–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Gao Y, Petkov S, et al. Passage number of porcine embryonic germ cells affects epigenetic status and blastocyst rate following somatic cell nuclear transfer. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014;147(1–2):39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells DN, Laible G, Tucker FC, et al. Coordination between donor cell type and cell cycle stage improves nuclear cloning efficiency in cattle. Theriogenology. 2003;59(1):45–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai Y, Li W, Zhang Z, et al. Epigenetic states of donor cells significantly affect the development of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos in pigs. Mol Reprod Dev. 2018;85(1):26–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Liu X, Wang F, et al. Different donor cell culture methods can influence the developmental ability of cloned sheep embryos. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehland R, Al-Rostum F, Becker F, et al. Donor cell lines considerably affect the outcome of somatic nuclear transfer in the case of bovines. J Reprod Dev. 2007;53(4):737–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh S, Shim H, Hwang WS, et al. In vitro development of green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic bovine embryos after nuclear transfer using different cell cycles and passages of fetal fibroblasts. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2000;12(1–2):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes FL, Collas P, Powell R, et al. Influence of recipient oocyte cell cycle stage on DNA synthesis, nuclear envelope breakdown, chromosome constitution, and development in nuclear transplant bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 1993;36(1):33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Peng H, Liu F, et al. The expression of β-galactosidase during long-term cultured goat skin fibroblasts and the effect of donor cell passage on in vitro development of nuclear transfer embryos. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2016;52(5):555–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho J, Bhuiyan MM, Shin S, et al. Development potential of transgenic somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos according to various factors of donor cell. J Vet Med Sci. 2004;66(12):1567–1573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Ao H, Pan Q, et al. Effects of different states of sheep fetal fibroblasts as donor cells on the early development in vitro of reconstructed sheep embryos. Sci China C Life Sci. 2007;50(2):178–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei H, Qing Y, Pan W, et al. Comparison of the efficiency of Banna miniature inbred pig somatic cell nuclear transfer among different donor cells. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang ES, Yoon G, Kang HT. A comparative analysis of the cell biology of senescence and aging. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66(15):2503–2524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matjusaitis M, Chin G, Sarnoski EA, et al. Biomarkers to identify and isolate senescent cells. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;29:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin SJ, Henry CM. Distinguishing between apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis and other cell death modalities. Methods. 2013;61(2):87–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Koo OJ, Park HJ, et al. Oct4 overexpression facilitates proliferation of porcine fibroblasts and development of cloned embryos. Zygote. 2015;23(5):704–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun H, Lee SE, Son YJ, et al. Cell synchronization by rapamycin improves the developmental competence of porcine SCNT embryos. Cell Reprogram. 2016;18(3):195–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim E, Hyun SH. Comparative analysis of various donor cell types for somatic cell nuclear transfer and its association with apoptosis and senescence. Mol Med Rep. 2014;9(1):63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neurohr GE, Terry RL, Lengefeld J, et al. Excessive cell growth causes cytoplasm dilution and contributes to senescence. Cell. 2019;176(5):1083–1097.e1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorl C, Sedivy JM. Analysis of cell cycle phases and progression in cultured mammalian cells. Methods. 2007;41(2):143–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai L, Tao T, Macháty Z, et al. Feasibility of producing porcine nuclear transfer embryos by using G2/M-stage fetal fibroblasts as donors. Biol Reprod. 2001;65(5):1558–1564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang E, Gundersen D. Increased organization of cytoskeleton accompanying the aging of human fibroblasts in vitro. Exp Cell Res. 1984;154(1):191–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Li H, Wang Y, et al. Screening somatic cell nuclear transfer parameters for generation of transgenic cloned cattle with intragenomic integration of additional gene copies that encode bovine adipocyte-type fatty acid-binding protein (A-FABP). Mol Biol Rep. 2017;44(1):159–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zhai Y, Ma X, et al. Down-regulation of H3K4me3 by MM-102 facilitates epigenetic reprogramming of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;45(4):1529–1540.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell KH, Loi P, Otaegui PJ, et al. Cell cycle co-ordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Rev Reprod. 1996;1(1):40–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, et al. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature. 2000;407(6800):86–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, et al. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Cloning Stem Cells. 2007;9(1):3–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boquest AC, Day BN, Prather RS. Flow cytometric cell cycle analysis of cultured porcine fetal fibroblast cells. Biol Reprod. 1999;60(4):1013–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda Mdos S, Bressan FF, Zecchin KG, et al. Serum-starved apoptotic fibroblasts reduce blastocyst production but enable development to term after SCNT in cattle. Cloning Stem Cells. 2009;11(4):565–573.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park ES, Hwang WS, Jang G, et al. Incidence of apoptosis in clone embryos and improved development by the treatment of donor somatic cells with putative apoptosis inhibitors. Mol Reprod Dev. 2004;68(1):65–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhang Y, Han Z, et al. Transcriptome analyses reveal effects of Vitamin C-treated donor cells on cloned bovine embryo development. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(11):2628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi D, Zeng Y, Xu M, et al. LC3-dependent autophagy in pig 2-cell cloned embryos could influence the degradation of maternal mRNA and the regulation of epigenetic modification. Cell Reprogram. 2017;19(6):354–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca-Agujetas V, de Dios C, Lestón L, et al. Recent insights into the mitochondrial role in autophagy and its regulation by oxidative stress. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:3809308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda K. Mitochondrial DNA transmission and confounding mitochondrial influences in cloned cattle and pigs. Reprod Med Biol. 2013;12(2):47–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar