The American securitization of China and Russia: U.S. geopolitical culture and declining unipolarity

References

• Albright, M. 1998. “Interview on NBC-TV ‘the Today Show’ with Matt Lauer.” February 19. https://1997-2001.state.gov/statements/1998/980219a.html
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosio, T. 2005. Challenging America’s Global Preeminence: Russia’s Quest for Multipolarity. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosio, T. 2009. Authoritarian Backlash: Russian Resistance to Democratization in the Former Soviet Union. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosio, T. 2017. “Russia’s Ukraine Intervention and Changes to American Perceptions of the Russian Threat: Executive Branch Testimony to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, 2008–2016.” Journal of Global Security Studies 2 (2): 104–122. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogx004.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosio, T., Heopfner P, Thompson KE, Watson K. 2018. “The Geopolitical Discourse of Barack Obama’s State of the Union Addresses: Pursuing a Geopolitical Reorientation from the Middle East.” Geopolitics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1414047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armed Services Committee. 2015. “Hearing to Consider the Nomination of General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., USMC, to Be Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.” https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/15-62%20-%207-9-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Averre, D. 2016. “The Ukraine Conflict: Russia’s Challenge to European Security Governance.” Europe-Asia Studies 68 (4): 699–725. doi:10.1080/09668136.2016.1176993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. 2011. Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beinart, P. 2019. “The Threat of Threat Assessments.” The Atlantic, January 31. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/01/worldwide-threat-assessment-evades-big-questions/581704/
   Google Scholar
• Broomfield, E. 2003. “Perceptions of Danger: The China Threat Theory.” Journal of Contemporary China 12 (35): 265–284. doi:10.1080/1067056022000054605.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., O. Wæver, and J. De Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, A. 2016. “Opening Statement – Senate Appropriations Committee-Defense (FY 2017 Budget Request).” April 27. https://dod.defense.gov/News/Speeches/Speech-View/Article/744092/opening-statement-senate-appropriations-committee-defense-fy-2017-budget-request/
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D. 2014. “Who Threatens Whom? the ‘Chinese Threat’ and the Bush Doctrine.” Journal of East Asia & International Law 7 (1): 31–49. doi:10.14330/jeail.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., and A. Ricketts. 2017. “US Grand Strategy and National Security: The Dilemmas of Primacy, Decline and Denial.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 71 (5): 479–498. doi:10.1080/10357718.2017.1342760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats, D. 2019. “Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community.” https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/2019-ATA-SFR—SSCI.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. 1979. Threat Perception in International Crisis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• “Defense Planning Guidance FY 1994-1999.” 1992. https://www.archives.gov/files/declassification/iscap/pdf/2008-003-docs1-12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense. 2018. “Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America.” https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, K. 1994. “Geopolitics and Foreign Policy: Recent Developments in Anglo-American Political Geography and International Relations.” Progress in Human Geography 18 (2): 186–208. doi:10.1177/030913259401800204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnham, B. 2003. “The Theory of Democratic Peace and Threat Perception.” International Studies Quarterly 47 (3): 395–415. doi:10.1111/isqu.2003.47.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. 2016. “Extraordinary or Ordinary Emergency Measures: What, and Who, Defines the ‘success’ of Securitization?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (2): 677–694. doi:10.1080/09557571.2015.1077651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, L. 2015. Watchdogs on the Hill: The Decline of Congressional Oversight of U.S. Foreign Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P. 2018. “Why Trump Won’t Retrench: The Militarist Redoubt in American Foreign Policy.” Political Science Quarterly 33 (4): 611–640.
   Google Scholar
• Hrg, S..102–765. 1992. “Threat Assessment, Military Strategy, and Defense Planning.” Senate Committee on Armed Services. http://www.loc.gov/law/find/nominations/gates/00059133123_excerpt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hrg, S..108–161. 2003. “Current and Projected National Security Threats to The United States.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee. https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/108161.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hrg, S..108–863. 2004. “Current and Future Worldwide Threats to The National Security Of The United States.” Senate Armed Services Committee. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-108shrg24122/pdf/CHRG-108shrg24122.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hrg, S..109–61. 2005. “Current and Projected National Security Threats to The United States.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-109shrg22379/pdf/CHRG-109shrg22379.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hrg, S..109–783. 2006. “Current and Future Worldwide Threats to The National Security Of The United States.” Senate Armed Services Committee. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-109shrg32745/pdf/CHRG-109shrg32745.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hrg, S..110–835. 2007. “Current and Projected National Security Threats to The United States.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-110shrg48098/pdf/CHRG-110shrg48098.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hrg, S..113–374. 2013. “Current and Future Worldwide Threats to The National Security Of The United States.” Senate Armed Services Committee. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-113shrg89575/pdf/CHRG-113shrg89575.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hrg, S..115–205. 2017. “Open Hearing on Worldwide Threats.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-115shrg25888/pdf/CHRG-115shrg25888.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. 2016. The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. 2019. “The Strongmen Strike Back.” Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/FP_20190318_strongmen_kagan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Katagiri, N. 2018. “Between Structural Realism and Liberalism: Japan’s Threat Perception and Response.” International Studies Perspectives 19 (4): 325–343. doi:10.1093/isp/eky005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, C. 2012. “This Time It’s Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 203–213. doi:10.1111/isqu.2012.56.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeGreco, M., and S. Tracy. 2009. “Discourse Tracing as Qualitative Practice.” Qualitative Inquiry 15 (9): 1516–1543. doi:10.1177/1077800409343064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legro, J. 2005. Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malmvig, H. 2014. “Power, Identity and Securitization in Middle East: Regional Order after the Arab Uprisings.” Mediterranean Politics 19 (1): 145–148. doi:10.1080/13629395.2013.856181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattis, J. 2018. “Secretary James N. Mattis Addresses the Center for the National Interest.” July 26. https://nationalinterest.org/print/feature/secretary-james-n-mattis-addresses-center-national-interest-26851
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. 2019. “Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order.” International Security 43 (4): 7–50. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, K. 2009. “Who Really Dictates What an Existential Threat Is? the Israeli Experience.” Journal of Strategic Studies 32 (5): 687–713. doi:10.1080/01402390903189360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2010. “Doing Discourse Analysis in Critical Geopolitics.” L’Espace Politique. https://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/1743
   Google Scholar
• Neuhauser, A. 2018. “Russia, China and the New Red Scare.” U.S. News. https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2018-06-19/russia-china-and-the-new-red-scare
   Google Scholar
• Ó Tuathail, G., and J. Agnew. 1992. “Geopolitics and Discourse Practical Geopolitical Reasoning in American Foreign Policy.” Political Geography 11 (2): 190–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellete, M., and T. Weiss. 2015. “’this Marvelous Symbol of Our Identity’: The Czech Republic in American Practical Geopolitics.” Geopolitics 20 (2): 267–286. doi:10.1080/14650045.2014.964862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, C. 2012. Knowledge, Desire, and Power in Global Politics: Western Representations of China’s Rise. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Peoples, C., and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2015. Critical Security Studies: An Introduction. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. 2006. Identifying Threats and Threatening Identities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renz, B. 2016. “Russia and 'Hybrid Warfare'.”Contemporary Politics 22 (3): 283–300. doi:10.1080/13569775.2016.1201316
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.103-630. 1994. “Current and Projected National Security Threats to the United States and Its Interests Abroad.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77044-2.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.104-15. 1995. “Worldwide Intelligence Review.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.104-510. 1996. “Current and Projected National Security Threats to the United States and Its Interests Abroad.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.105-201. 1997. “Current and Projected National Security Threats to the United States.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.105-587. 1998. “Current and Projected National Security Threats to the United States.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.106-580. 2000. “Current and Projected National Security Threats to the United States.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.107-2. 2001. “Current and Projected National Security Threats to the United States.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.107-597. 2002. “Current and Projected National Security Threats to the United States.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.110-284. 2007. “Current and Future Worldwide Threats to The National Security Of The United States.” Senate Armed Services Committee. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-110shrg40703/pdf/CHRG-110shrg40703.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.110-634. 2008. “Current and Future Worldwide Threats to the National Security of the United States.” Senate Armed Services Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.111-254. 2009. “Current and Future Worldwide Threats to the National Security of the United States.” Senate Armed Services Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.111-557. 2010. “Current and Projected National Security Threats to the United States.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.112-159. 2011. “Current and Future Worldwide Threats to the National Security of the United States.” Senate Armed Services Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.112-481. 2012. “Current and Future Worldwide Threats to The National Security Of The United States.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112shrg74790/pdf/CHRG-112shrg74790.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.113-571. 2014. “Current and Future Worldwide Threats to The National Security Of The United States.” Senate Armed Services Committee. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-113shrg93412/pdf/CHRG-113shrg93412.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.114-300. 2015. “Worldwide Threats.” Senate Armed Services Committee. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-114shrg20720/pdf/CHRG-114shrg20720.pdf.See response to Q3.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.114-626. 2016. “Emerging United States Defense Challenges and Worldwide Threats.” Senate Armed Services Committee.
   Google Scholar
• S.Hrg.115-278. 2018. “Open Hearing on Worldwide Threats.” Senate Select Intelligence Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, R. 2011. “The Future Is Uncertain and the End Is Always Near.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 24 (2): 175–184. doi:10.1080/09557571.2010.496848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweller, R., and X. Pu. 2011. “After Unipolarity: China’s Visions of International Order in an Era of U.S. Decline.” International Security 36 (1): 41–72. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senate Armed Services Committee. 1999. “Testimony on the Current and Future Worldwide Threats to the National Security of the United States.” https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=6819.
   Google Scholar
• Scobell, A. 2018. “The South China Sea and U.S.-China Rivalry.” Political Science Quarterly 133 (2): 199–224. doi:10.1002/polq.v133.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, R. 2007. “The Discursive Origins of a Doctrine: Norms, Identity, and Securitization under Harry S. Truman and George W. Bush.” Foreign Policy Analysis 3 (3): 233–254. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00049.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, J. 2013. “Threat Perception in International Relations.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by L. Huddy, D. Sears, and J. Levy. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.364–394
   Google Scholar
• Stengel, F. 2019. “Securitization as Discursive (Re)articulation: Explaining the Relative Effectiveness of Threat Construction.” New Political Science 44 (2): 294–312. doi:10.1080/07393148.2019.1596682.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. 2018. “Trump, American Hegemony and the Future of the Liberal International Order.” International Affairs 9 (1): 133–150. doi:10.1093/ia/iix238.
   Google Scholar
• Swazo, N. 2004. “Primacy or World Order? the New Pax Americana.” International Journal on World Peace 21 (1): 15–37.
   Google Scholar
• Tsygankov, A. 2017. “The Dark Double: The American Media Perception of Russia as a Neo-Soviet Autocracy, 2008–2014.” Politics 37 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1177/0263395715626945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsygankov, A., and D. Parker. 2015. “The Securitization of Democracy: Freedom House Ratings of Russia.” European Security 24 (1): 77–100. doi:10.1080/09662839.2014.968775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, O. 2013. “‘Threatening’ China and US Security: The International Politics of Identity.” Review of International Studies 39 (4): 903–924. doi:10.1017/S0260210512000599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. 1990. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Xinsheng, L. et al. 2015. “Scientists’ Views and Positions on Global Warming and Climate Change: a Content Analysis Of Congressional Testimonies.” Climatic Change 131 (4): 487-503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., and X. Liu. 2012. “The ‘China Threat’ through the Lens of US Print Media: 1992-2006.” Journal of Contemporary China 21 (76): 695–711. doi:10.1080/10670564.2012.666838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar