On the (geo)political salience of geographical imaginations: a central European perspective

References

• Ágh, Attila. 2010. “Post-Accession Crisis in the New Member States: Progressing or Backsliding in the EU?” Studies of Transition States and Societies 2 (1): 74–95.
   Google Scholar
• Akcalı, Emel, and Korkut, Umut. 2012. “Geographical Metanarratives in East-Central Europe: Neo-Turanism in Hungary.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 53 (5): 596–614. doi:10.2747/1539-7216.53.5.596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anghel, Veronika. 2020. “Together or Apart? The European Union’s East–West Divide.” Survival 62 (3): 179–202. doi:10.1080/00396338.2020.1763621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, Hilary, and Mitchell A. Orenstein. 2016. “Why Did Neoliberalism Triumph and Endure in the Post-Communist World?” Comparative Politics 48 (3): 313–331. doi:10.5129/001041516818254419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogh, Péter. 2022. “Clashing Geopolitical Self-Images? The Strange Co-Existence of Christian Bulwark and Eurasianism.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 63: (6): 726–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1779772
   Google Scholar
• Bârgăoanu, Alina, Raluca Buturoiu, and Flavia Durach. 2019. “The East-West Divide in the European Union: A Development Divide Reframed as a Political One.” In Development in Turbulent Times, edited by Paul Dobrescu, 105–118. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chernobrov, Dimitri. 2016. “Ontological Security and Public (Mis)recognition of International Crises: Uncertainty, Political Imagining, and the Self.” Political Psychology 37 (5): 581–596. doi:10.1111/pops.12334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cichocki, Marek A. 2017. “The West’s Polymorphic Crises and Their Impact on the Visegrad Group.” In Illiberal Democracies in the EU: The Visegrad Group and the Risk of Disintegration, edited by Pol Morillas, 9–19. Barcelona: CIDOB Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Drulák, Petr. 2006. “Between Geopolitics and Anti-Geopolitics: Czech Political Thought.” Geopolitics 11 (3): 420–438. doi:10.1080/14650040600767883.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2016). “Big, Bad Visegrad. The Migration Crisis has Given an Unsettling New Direction to an Old Alliance.” Accessed 20 June 2022. https://www.economist.com/europe/2016/01/28/big-bad-visegrad
   Google Scholar
• Ejdus, Filip. 2020. Crisis and Ontological Insecurity. Serbia’s Anxiety Over Kosovo’s Secession. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gál, Zoltán, and Andrea Schmidt. 2017. “Geoeconomics in Central and Eastern Europe: Implications of FDI.” In Advances in Geoeconomics, edited by J. Mark Munoz, 76–93. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Göncz, Borbála, and György Lengyel. 2021. “Europhile Public Vs Eurosceptic Governing Elite in Hungary?” Intereconomics 56 (2): 86–90. doi:10.1007/s10272-021-0959-8.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, Derek. 1994. Geographical Imaginations. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Howie, Bill, and Nick Lewis. 2014. “Geographical Imaginaries: Articulating the Values of Geography.” New Zealand Geographer 70 (2): 131–139. doi:10.1111/nzg.12051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ištok, Robert, Irinia Kozárová, and Anna Polačková. 2018. “The Intermarium as a Polish Geopolitical Concept in History and in the Present.” Geopolitics 26 (1): 314–342. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1551206.
   Google Scholar
• James W. Scott and Hajdú, Zoltán 2022. “The Carpathian Basin as a ‘Hungarian Neighbourhood’: Imaginative Geographies of Regional Cooperation and National Q9 Exceptionalism.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 63: (6): 753–778.
   Google Scholar
• Kazharski, Aliaksei. 2018. “The End of ‘Central Europe’? The Rise of the Radical Right and the Contestation of Identities in Slovakia and the Visegrad Four.” Geopolitics 23 (4): 754–780. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1389720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kováts, Eszter, and Katarina Smejkalova. 2019. “The EU’s Ongoing East-West Divide: How the West’s Economic Exploitation and Moral Arrogance Fuel Right-Wing Populism in East-Central Europe.” International Politics and Society, 03.07.2019, accessed 22 January 2020. https://www.ips-journal.eu/regions/europe/article/show/the-eus-ongoing-east-west-divide-3575/
   Google Scholar
• Krasteva, Anna. 2017. “If Borders Did Not Exist, Euroscepticism Would Have Invented Them Or, on Post-Communist Re/De/Re/Bordering in Bulgaria.” Geopolitics 25 (3): 678–705. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1398142.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, Ivan, and Stephen Holmes. 2019. The Light That Failed. A Reckoning. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, Merje. 2007. Geopolitics Reframed. Security and Identity in Europe’s Eastern Enlargement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, David. 1961. “Geography. Experience and Imagination. Towards a Geographical Epistemology.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 51 (3): 241–260. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1961.tb00377.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. 2010. The Politics of Becoming European: A Study of Polish and Baltic Post-Cold War Security Imaginaries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Martin. 2020. “In Search of the Global East: Thinking Between North and South.” Geopolitics 25 (3): 734–755. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1477757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paül, Valerià, and Juan-M. Trillo-Santamaría. 2021. “The Emerging Mountain Imaginary of the Galician Highlands: A New National Landscape in an Era of Globalization?” Geographical Review 112 (3): 466–492. doi:10.1080/00167428.2021.1897812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluciński, Przemysław. 2020. “Debt and Crisis: Socio-Economic Critique of Neoliberal Transformation in Poland.” The Economic and Labour Relations Review 31 (2): 211–229. doi:10.1177/1035304620911120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, Hugh C. 1962. “The Geographical Imagination.” Landscape 11: 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Research Center, Pew. 2019. ““European Public Opinion Three Decades After the Fall of Communism.”
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Paul B. 2018. “Geopolitical Cultures, Pragmatic Patriotism, and Russia’s Disputed Islands.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 59 (1): 7–27. doi:10.1080/15387216.2017.1421474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, Paul B. 2022. “Insecurity, Incoherence, and Imagined Geographies.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 63: (6): 779–786. doi:10.1080/15387216.2022.2138485.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, Andrés. 2018. “The Revenge of the Places That Don’t Matter (And What to Do About It).” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1): 189–209. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsx024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, Edward. 1979. Imaginative Geography and Its Representations: Orientalizing the Oriental. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Andrea. 2018. “Challenges of the Illiberal Democracy in Hungary. Some Aspects to the 2018 Elections.” Polish Political Science Review 6 (2): 70–90. doi:10.2478/ppsr-2018-0014.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James W. 2020. “Hungarian Border Politics as an Anti-Politics of the European Union.” Geopolitics 25 (3): 658–677. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1548438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, James W. 2022. “Visegrád Four Political Regionalism as a Critical Reflection of Europeanization: Deciphering the ‘Illiberal Turn’.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 63: (6) 704–725. doi:10.1080/15387216.2021.1972023.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adrian. 2002. “Imagining Geographies of the “New Europe” Geo-Economic Power and the New European Architecture of Integration.” Political Geography 21 (5): 5647–5670. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00011-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Adrian, and Adam Swain. 2010. “The Global Economic Crisis, Eastern Europe, and the Former Soviet Union: Models of Development and the Contradictions of Internationalization.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 51 (1): 1–34. doi:10.2747/1539-7216.51.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepić, Milomir, and Ivan Zarić. 2016. “Serbia and Geopolitical (Non)complementarity of the Danube Strategy and the New Silk Road.” In Danube and the New Silk Road, edited by Duško Dimitrijević, 447–466. Belgrade: Institute of International Politics and Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Toal, Gerald. 2017. Near Abroad: Putin, the West and the Contest Over Ukraine and the Caucasus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trencsényi, B. 2017. “Central Europe.” In European Regions and Boundaries: A Conceptual History, edited by D. Mishkova and B. Trencsényi, 166–187. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Zarycki, Tomasz. 2014. Ideologies of Eastness in Central and Eastern Europe BASEES/Routledge Series on Russian and East European. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zielonka, Jan. 2019. “The Mythology of the East-West Divide”. Eurozine Accessed 5 March 2019, https://www.eurozine.com/mythology-east-west-divide/
   Google Scholar