Chinese investments as part of infrastructure-led development: multi-scalar contestations around Georgia’s flagship infrastructure projects

References

• Aidukaite, Jolanta, and Christian Fröhlich. 2015. “Struggle Over Public Space: Grassroots Movements in Moscow and Vilnius.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 35 (7/8): 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-01-2015-0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alden, Chris, and Oscar M. Otele. 2022. “Fitting China In: Local Elite Collusion and Contestation Along Kenya’s Standard Gauge Railway.” African Affairs 121 (484): 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adac026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaklia Development Consortium. 2020. “About | Anaklia.” http://anakliadevelopment.com/about/.
   Google Scholar
• Anand, Nikhil, Akhil Gupta, and Hannah Appel. 2018. The Promise of Infrastructure. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antadze, Nino, and Kety Gujaraidze. 2021. “The Role of Traditional Rituals in Resisting Energy Injustice: The Case of Hydropower Developments in Svaneti, Georgia.” Energy Research & Social Science 79 (September): 102152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102152.
   Google Scholar
• Antonelli, Francesco. 2017. Net-Activism:How Digital Technologies Have Been Changing Individual and Collective Actions. Rome: Roma Tre-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apostolopoulou, Elia. 2021. “Tracing the Links Between Infrastructure-Led Development, Urban Transformation, and Inequality in China’s Belt and Road Initiative.” Antipode 53 (3): 831–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, Hilary, and A. Orenstein Mitchel. 2016. “Why Did Neoliberalism Triumph and Endure in the Post-Communist World?” Comparative Politics 48 (3): 313–331. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041516818254419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayers, Alison J. 2013. “Beyond Myths, Lies and Stereotypes: The Political Economy of a ‘New Scramble for Africa’.” New Political Economy 18 (2): 227–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2012.678821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, Andrew. 2013. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline. 1. Publ. RGS-IBG Book Series. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026245946&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, Andrew, and Evelina Gambino. 2021. “Unsustainable Transition? Hydropower and the Post-Covid Recovery in Georgia.” openDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/unsustainable-transition-hydropower-and-post-covid-recovery-georgia/.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, Thorsten, Jan Weidenfeld, Mareike Ohlberg, Lucrezia Poggetti, and Kristin Shi-Kupfer. 2018. “Authoritarian Advance: Responding to China’s Growing Political Influence in Europe | Merics.” Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute (GPPi) and Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS). https://merics.org/en/report/authoritarian-advance-responding-chinas-growing-political-influence-europe.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, Dorothee, and Béla Greskovits. 2012. “Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Cornell Studies in Political Economy”. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, Dorothee, and Wade Jacoby. 2017. “Lean, Special, or Consensual? Vulnerability and External Buffering in the Small States of East-Central Europe.” Comparative Politics 49 (2): 191–212. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041517820201341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buier, Natalia. 2020. “The Second Coming of Rail: The Spanish High-Speed Rail-Finance Complex.” Antipode 52 (6): 1603–1623. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buier, Natalia. 2022. “The Anthropology of Infrastructure: The Boom and the Bubble?” Focaal 1 (aop): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2022.012401.
   Google Scholar
• Carmody, Pádraig, Ian Taylor, and Tim Zajontz. 2022. “China’s Spatial Fix and ‘Debt Diplomacy’ in Africa: Constraining Belt or Road to Economic Transformation?” Canadian Journal of African Studies/Revue Canadienne Des Études Africaines 56 (1): 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2020.1868014.
   Google Scholar
• Chipashvili, David. 2021. “How Much Water Should Stay in the River? (Რამდენიწყალიუნდადარჩესმდინარეში?).” Green Alternative September 20. https://greenalt.org/blogs/ramdeni-wyali-unda-darches-mdinareshi/.
   Google Scholar
• Civil Georgia. 2021. “Dissetisfaction About the Statement of the Turkish Ambassador About the Namakhvani HPP (Ნამახვანჰესის შესახებ თურქეთის ელჩის განცხადებას უკმაყოფილება მოჰყვა).” Civil Georgia (Blog). April 2. https://civil.ge/ka/archives/410282.
   Google Scholar
• Commersant. 2019. “Georgian Road Construction Companies No Longer Participate in Large Infrastructure Projects (Დიდ ინფრასტრუქტურულ პროექტებში გზის მშენებელი ქართული კომპანიები არ მონაწილეობენ).” Commersant. https://commersant.ge/ge/post/ucxoelebze-mindobili-saavtomobilo-tenderebi-da-tamashidan-gasuli-kompaniebi.
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, Deborah, and Neil Smith. 2009. “After Geopolitics? From the Geopolitical Social to Geoeconomics.” Antipode 41 (1): 22–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00654.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danyluk, Martin. 2021. “Supply-Chain Urbanism: Constructing and Contesting the Logistics City.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (7): 2149–2164. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1889352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, Jago. 2017. “The Global Infrastructure Turn and Urban Practice.” Urban Policy and Research 35 (1): 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2017.1284036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EIB and EBRD. 2021. Georgia Country Diagnostic. European Investment Bank. https://doi.org/10.2867/184411.
   Google Scholar
• Gabor, Daniela. 2021. “The Wall Street Consensus.” Development and Change 52 (3): 429–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabor, Daniela. 2023. “The (European) Derisking State.” Stato e Mercato (12023): 53–84. https://doi.org/10.1425/107674.
   Google Scholar
• Gabor, Daniela, and Ndongo Samba Sylla. 2023. “Derisking Developmentalism: A Tale of Green Hydrogen.” Development & Change 54 (5): 1169–1196. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabritchidze, Nini. 2022. “Georgia, Azerbaijan See Surge in Transit Demand amid Russia’s Isolation” | Eurasianet. June 2. https://eurasianet.org/georgia-azerbaijan-see-surge-in-transit-demand-amid-russias-isolation.
   Google Scholar
• Gambino, Evelina. 2019a. “Georgia, the South Caucasus and the BRI: A Situated View.” Caucasus Analytical Digest (111): 10–13. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000368298.
   Google Scholar
• Gambino, Evelina. 2019b. “The Georgian Logistics Revolution: Questioning Seamlessness Across the New Silk Road.” Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation 13 (1): 190–206. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.13.1.0190.
   Google Scholar
• Gambino, Evelina. 2021. “(Re)Producing the Logistical Future: Ethnography, Infrastructure and the Making of Georgia’s Global Connections.” Doctoral thesis., London: UCL (University College London).
   Google Scholar
• Gaprindashvili, Paata, and Mariam Tsitsikashvili. 2021. “Op-Ed: ‘Anaklia Deep-Sea Port – Too Important for Georgia and the West to Lose.’” Georgia’s Reforms Associates (Grass), https://grass.org.ge/en/skhva-publikatsiebi/op-ed/1307-op-ed-anaklia-deep-sea-port-too-important-for-georgia-and-the-west-to-lose.
   Google Scholar
• Garlick, Jeremy. 2019. “China’s Economic Diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe: A Case of Offensive Mercantilism?” Europe-Asia Studies 71 (8): 1390–1414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1648764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelantia, Telara. 2021. “The vision of Irakli Gharibashvili regarding energy politics „ჰესების მიმართ პოლიტიკა უნდა იყოს შემდეგი…“- ირაკლი ღარიბაშვილის ხედვა.” Business Media Georgia. November 24. https://bm.ge/ka/article/hesebis-mimart-politika-unda-iyos-shemdegi—irakli-garibashvilis-xedva-/96062.
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Today. 2022. “PM: Anaklia Port is to Be Built with Co-Participation of State, Whereby 51% Will Be Owned by State by Our Decision.” Georgia Today. December 13. https://georgiatoday.ge/pm-anaklia-port-is-to-be-built-with-co-participation-of-state-whereby-51-will-be-owned-by-state-by-our-decision/.
   Google Scholar
• Gogishvili, David, and Suzanne Harris-Brandts. 2020. “Coinciding Practices of Exception in Urban Development: Mega-Events and Special Economic Zones in Tbilisi, Georgia.” European Planning Studies 28 (10): 1999–2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1701995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Huiwen, and Robert Hassink. 2019. “Co-Evolution in Contemporary Economic Geography: Towards a Theoretical Framework.” Regional Studies 53 (9): 1344–1355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1494824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, Tom, and Zhengli Huang. 2021. “Contingent Infrastructure and the Dilution of ‘Chineseness’: Reframing Roads and Rail in Kampala and Addis Ababa.” Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space 53 (4): 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20967962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Góralska, Magdalena. 2020. “Anthropology from Home: Advice on Digital Ethnography for the Pandemic Times.” Anthropology in Action 27 (1): 46–52. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2020.270105.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Georgia. 2014. “Social-Economic Development Strategy of Georgia ‘GEORGIA 2020.” Tbilisi. file:///C:/Users/lelre/Desktop/DFG/Lit-Regional/cps-geo-2014-2018-sd-01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Georgia. 2022. “Invest in Georgia.” Invest in Georgia. https://www.investingeorgia.org.
   Google Scholar
• Group, Hualing. 2015. “Hualing Tbilisi Sea New City.” Hualing Group (Blog). November 30. http://hualing.ge/language/en/tbilisi-sea-new-city-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, Gillian. 2018. “Relational Comparison Revisited: Marxist Postcolonial Geographies in Practice*.” Progress in Human Geography 42 (3): 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516681388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, Penny, and Hannah Knox. 2012. “The Enchantments of Infrastructure.” Mobilities 7 (4): 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.718935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, David, and Paik Nak-Chung. 2017. “How Capital Operates and Where the World and China are Going: A Conversation Between David Harvey and Paik Nak-Chung.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 18 (2): 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2017.1309501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildyard, Nicholas. 2017. “Licensed Larceny: Infrastructure, Financial Extraction and the Global South.” https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781784994266.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• I fact, Investigative Journalists’ Team. 2023. “რიკოთის გზა - საუკუნის პროექტი თუ სახიფათო ავტობანი?” July 13. https://ifact.ge/rikotis-gza-saukunis-proeqti-tu-khifatit-savse-avtobani/.
   Google Scholar
• Imedi News. 2021. “Director of the Regional Office of EBRD: Adressing Georgia’s Increasing Energy Consumption Needs is Important.” May 14. https://imedinews.ge/ge/ekonomika/201486/ebrdis-regionuli-direqtori-mnishvnelovania-saqartvelos-mzardi-energetikuli-motkhovnilebebis-dakmakopileba.
   Google Scholar
• Investigative Reporter. 2023. The Pass of Concrete, Landslides on the Road/ბეტონის უღელტეხილი. მეწყერი დიდ გზაზე“. Tbilisi,Georgia: First Channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khyAJp3aGOI.
   Google Scholar
• Kanai, J Miguel, and Seth Schindler. 2022. “Infrastructure-Led Development and the Peri-Urban Question: Furthering Crossover Comparisons.” Urban Studies 59 (8): 1597–1617. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211064158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankia, Giorgi. 2020. Social Infrastructure of Mobility and Residential Spaces (მობილობის სოციალური ინფრასტრუქტურა და საცხოვრებელი სივრცეები). Tbilisi: Heinrich Böll stiftung South Caucasus.
   Google Scholar
• Karásková, Ivana, Alicja Bachulska, Ágnes Szunomár, and Stefan Vladisavljev. 2020. “Empty Shell No More: China’s Growing Footprint in Central and Eastern Europe.” In CHOICE China Observers in Central and Eastern Europe. Prague: CHOICEChina Observers in Central and Eastern Europe. https://chinaobservers.eu/new-publication-empty-shell-no-more-chinas-growing-footprint-in-central-and-eastern-europe/.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, Julie Michelle. 2020. “Environment, Development, and Security Politics in the Production of Belt and Road Spaces.” Territory, Politics, Governance 8 (5): 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1582358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, Julie Michelle, and Joshua S. S. Muldavin. 2019. “New Geographies of Development: Grounding China’s Global Integration.” Territory, Politics, Governance 7 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1559757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochladze, Manana. 2021. “The Never Ending Saga of the Nenskra HPP.” Bankwatch September 17. https://bankwatch.org/blog/the-never-ending-saga-of-the-nenskra-hpp.
   Google Scholar
• Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. 2016. “How Do Weaker States Hedge? Unpacking ASEAN States’ Alignment Behavior Towards China.” Journal of Contemporary China 25 (100): 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1132714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Rosa, and Alke Jenss. 2022. “Scalar Struggles: The Selectivity of Development Governance in Southern Mexico.” Latin American Research Review 57 (4): 848–866. https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2022.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Kean Fan. 2010. “On China’s Growing Geo-Economic Influence and the Evolution of Variegated Capitalism.” Geoforum 41 (5): 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Kean Fan, and Kristin Limbach. 2023. “From the City of Steel to Germany’s ‘China City’: Economic Restructuring, the EU–China Transcontinental Railway and Infrastructure-Led Development in Duisburg.” Regional Studies: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2149727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Yuan, and Markus Taube, eds. 2019. How China’s Silk Road Initiative is Changing the Global Economic Landscape. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429455193.
   Google Scholar
• Makocki, Michal. 2017. China’s Road: Into Eastern Europe. European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep06771.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, Philipp. 2000. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia, and Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia. 2022. Integrated Energy and Climate Plan of Georgia. Draft Plan Tbilisi,Georgia. https://nea.gov.ge/Ge/GZSH/1180?fbclid=IwAR1XWobFFoDzcyT-GUdUkv0R-783a5a3SllSNGOk2CUESou_FlKXVurxwDs.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. 2022. “Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili of Georgia Meets with Wang Yi.” Official Website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. September 22. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/202209/t20220923_10770195.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, Giles, and May Tan-Mullins. 2019. “The Geopolitics of South–South Infrastructure Development: Chinese-Financed Energy Projects in the Global South.” Urban Studies 56 (7): 1368–1385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018794351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikoladze, Tatia. 2023. “Road Through the Rikoti Pass in Georgia Closed Again What’s Wrong with the ‘Project of the Century’?” English Jamnews April 12. https://jam-news.net/the-road-through-the-rikoti-pass/.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Peter, Phil O’Neill, and Andy Pike. 2019. “Funding, Financing and Governing Urban Infrastructures.” Urban Studies 56 (7): 1291–1303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018824014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocaklı, Beril, and Benedikt Ibele. 2023. “Georgia’s Modern (Not so Environmental) Problems. The Nature of Road and Energy Infrastructures.” In Ecological Concerns in Transition: A Comparative Study on Responses to Waste and Environmental Destruction in the Region, by Ninna Mörner. 73–83. https://sh.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1746330&dswid=-2536.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlićević, Dragan. 2019. “A Power Shift Underway in Europe? China’s Relationship with Central and Eastern Europe Under the Belt and Road Initiative.” In Mapping China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ Initiative, edited by Li Xing, 249–278. International Political Economy Series Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92201-0_10.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, Andy, Peter O’Brien, Thomas L. Strickland, Thrower Graham, and Tomaney John. 2019. Financialising City Statecraft and Infrastructure. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781788118941.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Piletić, Aleksandra. 2023. “Renewable Energy and EU-Led Authoritarian Neoliberalization: Small Hydropower in Rakita, Serbia and the Upscaling of Environmental Struggles.” Globalizations 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2167985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politico. 2018. “Beware Chinese Trojan Horses in the Balkans, EU Warns.” POLITICO. July 27. https://www.politico.eu/article/johannes-hahn-beware-chinese-trojan-horses-in-the-balkans-eu-warns-enlargement-politico-podcast/.
   Google Scholar
• Qeburia, Tamuna, and Tatuli Chubabria. 2017. Contentious Politics: Experiences and Perspectives. Tbilisi: Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center, Heinrich Böll Stiftung. https://ge.boell.org/sites/default/files/publication.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rekhviashvili, Lela. 2016. “Counterbalancing Marketization Informally: Georgia’s New-Institutionalist Reform and Its Discontents.” Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 24 (3): 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965156X.2016.1260657.
   Google Scholar
• Rekhviashvili, Lela. 2021. “A Louder Periphery: Guardians of the Rioni Valley Against the ‘Namakhvani Hydroelectric Power Plant (HPP).” Lefteast. March 15. https://lefteast.org/a-louder-periphery-guardians-of-the-rioni-valley-against-the-namakhvani-hydroelectric-power-plant-hpp/.
   Google Scholar
• Rekhviashvili, Lela. 2022. Struggle for Rioni Valley in Between Civil and Political Society Terrains: Contested Infrastructures and Development Politics. Tbilisi, Georgia: Heinrich Boell Foundation South Caucasus Regional Office. https://ge.boell.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/rioni_valley_struggle.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rogelja, Igor. 2020. “Concrete and Coal: China’s Infrastructural Assemblages in the Balkans.” Political Geography 81:102220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowden, Rick. 2019. From the Washington Consensus to the Wall Street Consensus The Financialization Initiative of the World Bank and Multilateral Development Banks. Washington, DC: Heinrich Böll Stiftung North America. https://us.boell.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/Rowden%20From%20Washington%20To%20Wall%20Street.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, Seth. 2019. “Infrastructure-Led Development and the Territorialization of Development Machines.” Society for Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/infrastructure-led-development-and-the-territorialization-of-development-machines.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, Seth, Ilias Alami, Jessica DiCarlo, Nicholas Jepson, Steve Rolf, Mustafa Kemal Bayırbağ, Louis Cyuzuzo, et al. 2023. “The Second Cold War: US-China Competition for Centrality in Infrastructure, Digital, Production, and Finance Networks.” Geopolitics 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2023.2253432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, Seth, and Jessica DiCarlo. 2023. “Introduction: Geopolitics, Infrastructure, and the Emergent Geographies of US– China Competition.” In The Rise of the Infrastructure State, 1–10. Bristol: Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/the-rise-of-the-infrastructure-state.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, Seth, Jessica DiCarlo, and Dinesh Paudel. 2021. “The New Cold War and the Rise of the 21st-Century Infrastructure State.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 47 (2): 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, Seth, and J. Miguel Kanai. 2021. “Getting the Territory Right: Infrastructure-Led Development and the Re-Emergence of Spatial Planning Strategies.” Regional Studies 55 (1): 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1661984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schueth, Samuel. 2011. “Assembling International Competitiveness: The Republic of Georgia, USAID, and the Doing Business Project.” Economic Geography 87 (1): 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01103.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. 1989. “Everyday Forms of Resistance.” The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 4 (1): 33. https://doi.org/10.22439/cjas.v4i1.1765.
   Google Scholar
• Simonia, Dato. 2023. “Security Sacrificed to Corruption/კორუფციას შეწირული უსაფრთხოება.” April 14. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10219957266756946&set=a.3439774248029.
   Google Scholar
• Smolnik, Franziska. 2018. “Georgia Positions Itself on China’s New Silk Road.” In Vol. 13. SWP Comment. Berlin, German Institute for International and Security Affairs. https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/georgia-positions-itself-on-chinas-new-silk-road.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, Tim. 2016. “China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: Sub-National Regions and Networks of Global Political Economy.” Third World Quarterly 37 (9): 1628–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, Tim. 2020. “Structural Power and the Financing of the Belt and Road Initiative.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 61 (2): 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1715234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik. 2004. “Scaled Geographies: Nature, Place, and the Politics of Scale.” In Scale and Geographic Inquiry, 129–153. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999141.ch7.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó, Linda, and Csaba Jelinek. 2023. “State, Capitalism and Infrastructure-Led Development: A Multi-Scalar Analysis of the Belgrade-Budapest Railway Construction.” Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space 55 (5): 1281–1304. April, 0308518X231156171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X231156171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. 2013. “Contentious Politics.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm051.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, Charles, and Sidney G. Tarrow. 2007. Contentious Politics. Boulder, Colo: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Torsello, Davide. 2010. “Civil Society and Environmental Activism in One EU-Funded Transport Development Project in Slovakia.” Eastern European Countryside 16 (2010): 25–43. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10130-010-0002-8.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, Elena F., Evgeny Shvarts, Eugene Simonov, and Mikhail Babenko. 2017. “China’s New Eurasian Ambitions: The Environmental Risks of the Silk Road Economic Belt.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 58 (1): 56–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2017.1295876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuvikene, Tauri, Wladimir Sgibnev, and Carola S Neugebauer. 2019. Post-Socialist Urban Infrastructures. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Post-Socialist-Urban-Infrastructures-OPEN-ACCESS/Tuvikene-Sgibnev-Neugebauer/p/book/9780815392651.
   Google Scholar
• Vangeli, Anastas, and Dragan Pavlićević. 2019. “Introduction: New Perspectives on China – Central and Eastern Europe Relations.” Asia Europe Journal 17 (4): 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00560-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Veelen, Bregje, Ludovico Rella, Gerald Taylor Aiken, Emily Judson, Evelina Gambino, Alke Jenss, Ankur Parashar, and Annabel Pinker. 2021. “Interventions on Democratizing Infrastructure.” Political Geography 87 (May): 102378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102378.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Yuan. 2022. “Presidential Extraversion: Understanding the Politics of Sino-African Mega-Infrastructure Projects.” World Development 158:105976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje. 2017. “A Theory of Contestation—A Concise Summary of Its Argument and Concepts.” Polity 49 (1): 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1086/690100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Joe, Caitlin Robinson, and Stefan Bouzarovski. 2020. “China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the Emerging Geographies of Global Urbanisation.” The Geographical Journal 186 (1): 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2019. “Press Release: World Bank Group Debars China Railway Construction Corporation Ltd. and Two Subsidiaries.” The World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2019/06/05/world-bank-group-debars-china-railway-construction-corporation-ltd-and-two-subsidiaries.
   Google Scholar
• Zalinger, Benjamin. 2021. Red Dragon on the Black Sea. Washington, DC: The Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA). https://cepa.org/article/red-dragon-on-the-black-sea/.
   Google Scholar