98
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Interrogative Prerogatives: A Content Analysis of Police Policies on School-Based Interviews and Interrogations

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 376-386 | Received 15 Sep 2023, Accepted 21 Dec 2023, Published online: 29 Dec 2023

References

  • Bettens, T., & Normile, C. J. (2023). Concerns and recommendations regarding the training of school administrators in interrogating students. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2023.2196424
  • Bracy, N. L. (2010). Circumventing the law: Students’ rights in schools with police. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(3), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986210368645
  • Burla, L., Knierim, B., Barth, J., Liewald, K., Duetz, M., & Abel, T. (2008). From text to codings: Intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nursing Research, 57(2), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNR.0000313482.33917.7d
  • Cho, J., & Lee, E.-H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1028
  • Cleary, H. M. D. (2017). Applying the lessons of developmental psychology to the study of juvenile interrogations: New directions for research, policy, and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 23(1), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000120
  • Cleary, H. M. D., & Vidal, S. (2016). Miranda in actual juvenile interrogations: Delivery, waiver, and readability. Criminal Justice Review, 41(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016814538650
  • Cleary, H. M. D., & Warner, T. C. (2017). Parents’ knowledge and attitudes about youths’ interrogation rights. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(8), 777–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1324030
  • Colwell, L. H., Cruise, K. R., Guy, L. S., McCoy, W. K., Fernandez, K., & Ross, H. H. (2005). The influence of psychosocial maturity on male juvenile offenders’ comprehension and understanding of the Miranda warning. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33(4), 444–454.
  • Crane, M. (2020). Principal interrogator: A call for youth-informed analysis of schoolhouse interrogations. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 23(1), 77–138.
  • Davis, E. J. (2022). Law enforcement agencies that employ school resource officers, 2019 ( NCJ 305181). https://bjs.ojp.gov/media/leaesro19.pdf
  • Drury, J. (2003). Adolescent communication with adults in authority. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X02250057
  • D.Z. v. State, No. 18S-JV-295. (2018).
  • Farber, H. B. (2004). The role of the parent/guardian in juvenile custodial interrogations: Friend or foe? American Criminal Law Review, 41(3), 1277–1312.
  • Feld, B. C. (2013). Real interrogation: What actually happens when cops question kids. Law & Society Review, 47(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12000
  • Gardner, M. R. (2020). Removing Miranda from school interrogations. Nebraska Law Review, 16(1), 16–57.
  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
  • Gleit, R. D. (2022). Cops on campus: The racial patterning of police in schools. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 8, 237802312211080. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221108037
  • Grisso, T., Steinberg, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., Scott, E., Graham, S., Lexcen, F., Reppucci, N. D., & Schwartz, R. (2003). Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 27(4), 333–363. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024065015717
  • Hathorn, B. C. (2008). Constitutional law- searches, seizures, & confessions- constitutional protections for students in public schools. Tennessee Law Review, 76(1), 211–234.
  • Hess, J. E. (2010). Interviewing & interrogation for law enforcement (2nd ed.). LexisNexis/Anderson Pub.
  • Jacobi, T., & Clafton, R. (2023). The law of disposable children: Interrogations in schools. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4394194
  • J.D.B. v. North Carolina. (2011). 564 U.S. 261. https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep564261/
  • Jeffs, M., & Brian, S. (2022). Parental presence or totality of circumstances? An assessment of Utah’s juvenile Miranda law & 50 state survey. NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 24(3), 565–610. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4047054
  • Klemfuss, J. Z., & Olaguez, A. P. (2020). Individual differences in children’s suggestibility: An updated review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 29(2), 158–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1508108
  • McLachlan, K., Roesch, R., & Douglas, K. S. (2011). Examining the role of interrogative suggestibility in Miranda rights comprehension in adolescents. Law and Human Behavior, 35(3), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9198-4
  • Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
  • Miranda v Arizona, 384 U.S. 436. (1966). https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep384436/
  • Nance, J. P. (2016). Students, police, and the school-to-prison pipeline. Washington University Law Review, 93(4), 919–988.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Multi-year table 1. Number of school resource officers, number of public schools, and the number of public schools with school resource officers, by full- and part-time school resource officer status: 2003–04 Through 2015–16. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ssocs/tables/tab_my01_2016_all.asp
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Table 233.70. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_233.70.asp
  • N.C. v. Commonwealth, 396 S.W.3d. (2013).
  • Nelson, L., Leung, V., & Cobb, J. (2016). The right to remain a student: How California school policies fail to protect and serve. https://www.aclunc.org/sites/default/files/20161019-the_right_to_remain_a_student-aclu_california_0.pdf
  • Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Merckelbach, H., & Muris, P. (2018). Who is the better eyewitness? Sometimes adults but at other times children. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(5), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418770998
  • Penrose, M. (2006). Miranda, please report to the principal’s office. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 33(3), 775–790.
  • People v. Dilworth, 661 N.E.2d 310. (1996).
  • People v. Kay, No. A145381, 636215. (2018).
  • Redlich, A. D., & Goodman, G. S. (2003). Taking responsibility for an act not committed: The influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022543012851
  • Snow, M. D., Malloy, L. C., & Goldstein, N. E. S. (2021). Information gathering in school contexts: A national survey of school resource officers. Law and Human Behavior, 45(4), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000451
  • Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1764–1778. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012955
  • Sutherland, R., & Hayne, H. (2001). Age-related changes in the misinformation effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79(4), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2000.2610
  • Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503. (1969). https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep393503/
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Table 1.3. types of state and district requirements for kindergarten entrance and attendance, by state: 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/tab1_3-2020.asp
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2023). Referrals to Law Enforcement and School-Related Arrests in U.S. Public Schools. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/referrals-and-arrests-part-5.pdf
  • U.S. Department of Justice. (n.d.). Supporting Safe Schools. https://cops.usdoj.gov/supportingsafeschools
  • Viljoen, J. L., Klaver, J., & Roesch, R. (2005). Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: Predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals. Law and Human Behavior, 29(3), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-3613-2
  • Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 8–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00723.x
  • Vrij, A., Hartwig, M., & Granhag, P. A. (2019). Reading lies: Nonverbal communication and deception. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103135
  • Zelle, H., Romaine, C. L. R., & Goldstein, N. E. S. (2015). Juveniles’ Miranda comprehension: Understanding, appreciation, and totality of circumstances factors. Law and Human Behavior, 39(3), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000116

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.