Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components

References

• ASPECSS FP7 project website 2014. Available at: http://www.aspecss-project.eu. Accessed May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow A, Reeves C, Carroll J, et al. Analysis of pedestrian accident leg contacts and distribution of contact points across the vehicle front. Paper presented at: 6th International Expert Symposium on Accident Research (ESAR); June 20–21, 2014; Hannover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Trade and Industry, UK. The Handbook of Adult Anthropometric and Strength Measurements—Data for Design Safety. Nottingham, UK: Institute for Occupational Ergonomics, University of Nottingham; 1996. Available at: http://www.openerg.com. Accessed July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards M, Nathanson A, Wisch M. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to cars. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15:173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEVC WG17. Improved test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection afforded by passenger cars. 2002. Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2006/wp29grsp/ps-187r1e.pdf. Accessed October 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Euro NCAP. 2020 ROADMAP, Euro NCAP. 2014. Available at: http://www.euroncap.com/files/Euro-NCAP-2020-Roadmap—June-2014-2—0-e11c0984-af94-420e-9d63-63edc8538745.pdf. Accessed July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson R, Rosen E. Integrated pedestrian countermeasures—potential of head injury reduction combining passive and active countermeasures. Saf Sci. 2012;50:400–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson R, Rosén E. Head injury reduction potential of integrated pedestrian protection systems based on accident and experimental data—benefit of combining passive and active systems. Paper presented at: IRCOBI 2014 Conference; September 2014. Available at: http://www.ircobi.org/downloads/irc14/default.htm. Accessed October 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson R, Zhang L, Boström O, Yang K. Influence of impact speed on head and brain injury outcome in vulnerable road user impacts to the car hood. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007;51:155–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamacher M, Eckstein L, Kuhn M, Hummel T. Assessment of active and passive technical measures for pedestrian protection at the vehicle front. Paper presented at: 22nd ESV Conference; 2011; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson T, Anderson R, Searson D. Pedestrian headform testing: inferring performance at impact speeds and for headform masses not tested, and estimating average performance in a range of real-world conditions. Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13:402–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiuchi T, Lubbe N, Otte D, Chen Q. Comparative study of VRU head impact locations. Paper presented at: 6th International Expert Symposium on Accident Research (ESAR); June 20–21, 2014; Hannover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence GJL, Hardy BJ, Carroll JA, Donaldson WMS, Visvikis C, Peel DA. A Study on the Feasibility of Measures Relating to the Protection of Pedestrians and Other Vulnerable Road Users —Final 2006. TRL Limited Unpublished Project Report UPR/VE/045/06 under Contract No. ENTR/05/17.01 to the European Commission. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/automotive/files/projects/report_pedestrian_trl_2006_en.pdf. Acce-ssed: July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lubbe N, Edwards M, Wisch M. Towards an integrated pedestrian safety assessment method. Paper presented at: IRCOBI 2012 Conference; 2012. Available at: http://www.ircobi.org/downloads/irc12/default.htm. Accessed July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Malm S, Krafft M, Kullgren A, Ydenius A, Tingvall C. Risk of permanent medical impairment (RPMI) in road traffic accidents. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008;52:293–100.
   Google Scholar
• Matsui Y. New injury reference values determined for TRL legform impactor from accident reconstruction test. Int J Crashworthiness. 2003;8(2):179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui Y. Proposal of injury risk curves for evaluating pedestrian head injury risk using headform impactor based on accident reconstruction [in Japanese with English abstract]. JSAE Trans. 2004;35(4):221–228.
   Google Scholar
• Matsui Y, Ishikawa H, Sasaki A. Validation of pedestrian upper legform impact tests—reconstruction of pedestrian accidents. Paper presented at: 16th Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Mottola E, Rodarius C, Schaub S. Pedestrian kinematics and specifications of new impact conditions for head- and leg-form impactors. 2013. Available at: http://www.aspecss-project.eu/downloads./ Accessed July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Final Economic Assessment, FMVSS No. 201, Upper Interior Head Protection. Docket No. NHTSA-1996-1762. 1995. Available at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=NHTSA-1996-1762-0003. Accessed July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad P, Mertz HJ. The Position of the US Delegation to the ISO Working Group 6 on the Use of HIC in the Automotive Environment. Warrington, PA: SAE; 1985. SAE Paper No. 851246.
   Google Scholar
• Rodmell C, Lawrence GJL. Comparison Between Dose–Response and Cumulative Methods of Injury Risk Analysis and Implications on the JARI Injury Risk Analysis. Workingham, UK: TRL Limited; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Rosén E, Kallhammer J, Eriksson D, Nentwich M, Fedriksson R, Smith K. Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:1949–1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt KU, Niederer P, Walz F. Trauma Biomechanics Introduction to Accidental Injury. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Searson, D, Anderson, R, Hutchinson T. Integrated assessment of pedestrian head impact protection in testing secondary safety and autonomous emergency braking. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;63:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searson D, Anderson R, Ponte G, van den Berg A. Headform impact test performance of vehicles under the GTR on pedestrian safety. 2009. Available at: http://casr.adelaide.edu.au/publications/researchreports/casr072.pdf. Accessed July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Seiniger P, Bartels O, Kunert M, Schaller T. Preventive Pedestrian Protection Test Procedures and Results. 2014. Available at: http://www.aspecss-project.eu/downloads/. Accessed July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Strandroth J, Rizzi M, Sternlund S, Lie A, Tingvall C. The correlation between pedestrian injury severity in real-life crashes and Euro NCAP pedestrian test results. Traffic Inj Prev. 2011;12:604–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y, Matsuoka F, Okuyama H, Imaizumi I. Development of injury probability functions for the flexible pedestrian legform impactor. SAE Int J Passenger Cars Mech Syst. 2012;5(1).
   Google Scholar
• Tingvall C, Ifver J, Krafft M, et al. The consequences of adopting a MAIS 3 injury target for road safety in the EU: a comparison with targets based on fatalities and long-term consequences. Paper presented at: IRCOBI 2013 Conference; 2013. Available at: http://www.ircobi.org/downloads/irc13/default.htm. Accessed December 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wisch M, Seiniger P, Pastor C, Edwards M, Visvikis C, Reeves C. Scenarios and weighting factors for pre-crash assessment of integrated pedestrian safety systems. 2013. Available at: http://www.aspecss-project.eu/downloads./ Accessed July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zaloshnja E, Miller T, Romano E, Spicer R. Crash costs by body part injured, fracture involvement, and threat to life severity, United States, 2000. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36:415–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zander O. Derivation of draft FlePLI prototype impactor limits. 6th Meeting of Informal Group GTR9 Phase 2, Document GTR9-06-08r1, March 2012. Retrieved from: https://www2.unece.org/wiki/download/attachments/5801858/GTR9-6-08-Rev1e.pdf?api=v2. Accessed July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zander O, Gehring D, Leßmann P. Improved assessment methods of lower extremity injuries in vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents using impactor tests and full scale dummy tests. Paper presented at: 22nd ESV Conference; 2011; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar