Age and Gender Differences in Time to Collision at Braking From the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study

References

• Aoki H, Aga M, Miichi Y, Matsuo Y, Tanaka S. Safety impact methodology (SIM) for effectiveness estimation of a pre-collision system (PCS) by utilizing driving simulator test and EDR data analysis. Paper presented at: SAE World Congress & Exhibition; 2010; Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki H, Ozaki O. Development of a car-following tendency prediction method and its application to a forward collision warning system. Paper presented at: 20th ITS World Congress; 2013; Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki H, van Quy Hung N, Yasuda H. Perceptual risk estimate (PRE): an index of the longitudinal risk estimate. Paper presented at: 22nd International Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference; 2011; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Aparicio A, Baurès S, Bargalló J, et al. Pre-crash performance of collision mitigation and avoidance systems–results from the ASSESS project. Paper presented at: FISITA 2012 World Automotive Congress; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss JP, Acton SA. Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. Appl Ergon. 2003;34:499–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton JL, Oxley J, Fildes B, et al. Characteristics of older drivers who adopt self-regulatory driving behaviours. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2006;9:363–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingus TA, Klauer SG, Neale VL, et al. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, Phase II—Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock P, Manster M. Time-to-contact: more than tau alone. Ecol Psychol. 1997;9:265–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris C, Jenkins M, Glaser D. Gender differences in risk assessment: why do women take fewer risks than men. Judgm Decis Mak. 2006;1:48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonah BA. Accident risk and risk-taking behaviour among young drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1986;18:255–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusano KD, Gabler HC. Model of collision avoidance with lane departure warning in real-world departure collisions with fixed roadside objects. Paper presented at: 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems; 2012a.
   Google Scholar
• Kusano KD, Gabler HC. Safety benefits of forward collision warning, brake assist, and autonomous braking systems in rear-end collisions. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2012b;13:1546–1555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusano KD, Gabler HC. Pre-crash scenarios for determining target populations of active safety systems. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2013a.
   Google Scholar
• Kusano KD, Gabler HC. Real-world driver crash avoidance maneuvers in rear-end collisions using event data recorders. Paper presented at: 4th Int. Conf. on Road Safety and Simulation; 2013b; Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Kusano KD, Gabler HC. Fleetwide safety benefits of production forward collision and lane departure warning systems. SAE Int J Passenger Cars. 2014;7:514–527.
   Google Scholar
• Kusano KD, Montgomery J, Gabler HC. Methodology for identifying car following events from naturalistic data. Paper presented at: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lee DN. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception. 1976;5:437–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung S, Starmer G. Gap acceptance and risk-taking by young and mature drivers, both sober and alcohol-intoxicated, in a simulated driving task. Accid Anal Prev. 2005;37:1056–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massie DL, Green PE, Campbell KL. Crash involvement rates by driver gender and the role of average annual mileage. Accid Anal Prev. 1997;29:675–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Forward Collision Warning System Confirmation Test. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nishio T. Vehicle Crash Predictive and Evasive Operation System by Neural Networks. 1996. United States Patent 5541590.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson LS. Safety belt use in automobiles with starter-interlock and buzzer-light reminder systems. Am J Public Health. 1975;65:1319–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff W, Oldak R. Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990;16:303–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thor CP, Gabler HC. Assessing the residual teen crash risk factors after graduated drivers license implementation. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:295–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Horst R. Time-to-collision as a cue for decision-making in braking. In: Gale AG, ed. Vision in Vehicles. Vol 15. 1991:19–26.
   Google Scholar